I have a theory that I believe applies to all individual sports. Individual sports require stronger mental skills than team sports and are much more subject to the pariicipant choking or having having diminished skills in competition versus practice.
The theory is simply this - if you can play in competition at the same skill level at which you play in practice, you have skills that most competitors do not. In other words, those who can play under stress at the same skill level at which you practice, with no stress, have mental attribute that many competitors don't have.
Archery In competition, I shoot at around 85% of my practice level.
Bowling In competition, I bowl at around 80% of my practice level.
Pool In compeition, I play at around only 60%-65% of practice level.
I can live with 80%-85% but I am astounded at how unspectacular my "practice to play" ratio is in pool.
(I am 95% sure I know why my pool game doesn't hold up under pressure and I'm working on it.)
I'm not smart enough for my theory to the original thought on this subject but I'd be interested in hearing how close others play in competition to their practice level.
The theory is simply this - if you can play in competition at the same skill level at which you play in practice, you have skills that most competitors do not. In other words, those who can play under stress at the same skill level at which you practice, with no stress, have mental attribute that many competitors don't have.
Archery In competition, I shoot at around 85% of my practice level.
Bowling In competition, I bowl at around 80% of my practice level.
Pool In compeition, I play at around only 60%-65% of practice level.
I can live with 80%-85% but I am astounded at how unspectacular my "practice to play" ratio is in pool.
(I am 95% sure I know why my pool game doesn't hold up under pressure and I'm working on it.)
I'm not smart enough for my theory to the original thought on this subject but I'd be interested in hearing how close others play in competition to their practice level.