Guy Manges
Registered
Question is , If we take 10 pool balls and drop them on an 9' pool table, How many ball configuration can be made , Quadrillion ?
Pretty sure we had this asked before and there was some math stuff happening to try to get a proper scientific answer. I think the final result was "A lot".Question is , If we take 10 pool balls and drop them on an 9' pool table, How many ball configuration can be made , Quadrillion ?
Question is , If we take 10 pool balls and drop them on an 9' pool table, How many ball configuration can be made , Quadrillion ?
I think it's more than that. 5800 square inches on that table so probably 800 possible spots for each of the 10 balls? I think that's 800!/790!, Which is a massive number like 1e29. And then maybe multiply that by 10! To account for ball order.
EasyQuestion is , If we take 10 pool balls and drop them on an 9' pool table, How many ball configuration can be made , Quadrillion ?
That’s only if you moved a ball a complete 2.25” one way or another to be considered a different position.
Moving it just 0.25” or maybe even less would technically be a different position of a ball.
Who really cares?
Easy
Surface area of pool table is 50x100= 5,000 square inches
A 2.25 inch diameter ball takes up 3.976 inches of surface area at it's circumference...
Take 5,000 inches divided by the surface area of a ball....that's 1,258. That's how many balls that could fit on a 9 foot table.
To figure all the possible combinations you need to do a mathematical calculation credit a Permutation Without Repetition.
The formula would be 1,258 times the next 9 descending whole numbers for each less spot on the table taken by the next ball....so
1,258 x 1,257 x 1,256, x 1,255 x 1,254 x 1,253 x 1,252 x 1,251 x 1,250 x 1,249 equals
9,577,054,998,202,898,152,157,349,600,000
That's 9.577 quintillion
Or 9.577 million trillions
It's a shit ton, but there's the math.
Good enough for me!The 6 people in the world who are both pool nerds, math nerds, and happen to be bored AZB members.
Just for curiosity sake, wouldn’t it be more than 1258?
For example, pretend the pockets are corners and not pockets. You place the cue ball tight to a corner. Now move it a microscopic distance from the side rail, but still on the short rail. Then continue that microscopic movement all the way down the rail until you touch the other side.
Those are all different positions that ball could land in and be touching the rail.
Now you have to move it away from the short/end rail a microscopic distance. And then start working backwards.
Wouldn’t that equate to a ridiculously high number that’s not just as simple as 1258 positions?
Who really cares?
And, as a sometimes physics and precision nerd, how far can a ball move and still be considered in the same position? The plank length? What about quantum effects?
Ya. You’d have to set up some parameters for the question.
But, I’d say we are high enough to call it infinite for our purposes.
As in, the odds of seeing an exact copy in one’s lifetime are basically zero. So for practical purposes, that makes the answer infinite.