That is a matter of personal choice- of course a cue owned and played by a great player, or a vintage cue from a very respected maker, if in great original condition commands the higher price and would be " spoiled" by a refinish. Same goes with many types of antique/ vintage higher end items.
However, lots of buyers, like me, when looking at vintage cues, don't necessarily want a cue with a worn finish, frayed wrap, stained ferrules, etc. I happen to like most of my cues to look newer in every way, even with cue playability being high the the forefront of my reason to buy/collect cues.
This TS, a four pointer, no inlays, no veneers, probably plays great, and if I were looking, I would view the Proficient refinish as a plus, and something that I would have done myself if I acquired the cue in less than excellent condition. My views on refinish aside; not everyone buys/ collects cues with resale at top of mind- I would buy a cue; if the price is within reason, because I like it for various reasons, and if I want it to look a certain way, not worried about someone who might not agree with my decision- I'm not alone on this as far as cues go.
Agreed, sir.
The cue was...and still is...solid.
The tips were old, the finish was a bit cloudy and scraped...and the old leather wrap was kinda gross.
It is now back to as-new shape, with no adverse impact to what it was, before the refinish.
Jesus didn't play 8-ball with it...so in my mind, I returned it to its original glory.
And if anyone could be trusted to do it right...it would be Scot.