vf question

T

tom haney

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Maybe this has been talked about & I missed it. Who
was the "unknown" everbody mentioned who ran all
over Corey Deuel?
 
I was there to see Mika Immonen beat Corey Deuels butt 10-1. In the first round Deuel lost to Tony Robles. Not exactly a "nobody". I didn't see him gambling but that doesn't mean he didn't I guess. Did you mean in the tourny? Also, Mika seemed to be the strongest player I saw. Johnny got a roll or two against him to pull it out 10-7 on the B side and his first loss was to Jeremy Jones 10-9. If he gets by Archer, he would have won the damn thing.
 
CueHunter said:
I was there to see Mika Immonen beat Corey Deuels butt 10-1. In the first round Deuel lost to Tony Robles. Not exactly a "nobody". I didn't see him gambling but that doesn't mean he didn't I guess. Did you mean in the tourny? Also, Mika seemed to be the strongest player I saw. Johnny got a roll or two against him to pull it out 10-7 on the B side and his first loss was to Jeremy Jones 10-9. If he gets by Archer, he would have won the damn thing.
Click to expand...

No, this was supposedly non- tourney gambling.
 
On the "action" tables downstairs any pro could get thier heads handed to them in the challenge table format by so-called unknowns who run out from everywhere.

I doubt very much that any of the unknowns is hunting Corey down for big table action.

I heard that the only two name "pros" who did any good were Keith and Ron Wiseman with both winning 10 or more games in a row.

John
 
instroke said:
On the "action" tables downstairs any pro could get thier heads handed to them in the challenge table format by so-called unknowns who run out from everywhere.

I doubt very much that any of the unknowns is hunting Corey down for big table action.

I heard that the only two name "pros" who did any good were Keith and Ron Wiseman with both winning 10 or more games in a row.

John
Click to expand...

Yes, John, I did hear it was an 8 foot table. That would make
a difference.
 
hondo said:
Yes, John, I did hear it was an 8 foot table. That would make
a difference.
Click to expand...

You're right, Hondo. It was a smaller table, but I believe it was a Diamond bar table, 3-1/2-by-7-foot in size.

ManlyShot
 
It was a 7 footer that was the money table or tables for that matter. Anyone can run racks on those. I would rather see the pros play "nobodys" on 9 footers! Then we would see how these people really play. The bigger table brings out your weaknesses in a hurry. The pros don't have too many weaknesses ya know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top