first off i must say that jennifer baretta is smoking hottt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i can't count the times that i have read on message boards like this one about how men are sexist and pigs for commenting on the ladies of billiards. whether it is jeanette's sexiness or karen corr's lack thereof, it is always what comes up when men talk about the women's tour. then of course the women come out of the woodworks and defend them by saying that we pigs should just concentrate on their skills and that they shouldn't be judged by their appearancs, and they do have a point there. now that one of them is nominated for an award based on her looks by ESPN it is all good. how come we are pigs for making the same judgements? i bet that many people, even in the pool community, had never ever ever heard of jennifer before this. i know i hadn't and i am usually on top of the sexy female athletes....no pun intended.
the fact is that sex sells! it has long been said that what the women's tour needed was more of the jeanette-type (very attractive and very good) and less of the uh....well......i don't know exactly how to say it.....you know the type i am talking about.
face it, for a sport to be successful on tv it has to have some asthetics to it. this jennifer baretta is great for women's pool. she could do the same for pool that anna did for women's tennis (on a much smaller scale). now, i know that women's tennis had been chocked full of talent for decades, bj king, martina, evert, graf, and more recently seles and the williamses, but anna did more for that sport than anybody. hopefully jennifer will win that contest on ESPN and get some momentum into the women's tour.
i can't count the times that i have read on message boards like this one about how men are sexist and pigs for commenting on the ladies of billiards. whether it is jeanette's sexiness or karen corr's lack thereof, it is always what comes up when men talk about the women's tour. then of course the women come out of the woodworks and defend them by saying that we pigs should just concentrate on their skills and that they shouldn't be judged by their appearancs, and they do have a point there. now that one of them is nominated for an award based on her looks by ESPN it is all good. how come we are pigs for making the same judgements? i bet that many people, even in the pool community, had never ever ever heard of jennifer before this. i know i hadn't and i am usually on top of the sexy female athletes....no pun intended.

the fact is that sex sells! it has long been said that what the women's tour needed was more of the jeanette-type (very attractive and very good) and less of the uh....well......i don't know exactly how to say it.....you know the type i am talking about.
face it, for a sport to be successful on tv it has to have some asthetics to it. this jennifer baretta is great for women's pool. she could do the same for pool that anna did for women's tennis (on a much smaller scale). now, i know that women's tennis had been chocked full of talent for decades, bj king, martina, evert, graf, and more recently seles and the williamses, but anna did more for that sport than anybody. hopefully jennifer will win that contest on ESPN and get some momentum into the women's tour.