whitewolf said:
My wife explained over and over and over to him that I wanted a front weighted cue. I believe my balance point is 19 also and this is standard (a choice you get to choose from), not custom, and this is the best he could do. Plus my cue is 20 ounces. How heavy is your cue? I am going to get some lighter butt weights (screw) and make it 18.5 ounces, like my wife's cue. It is indeed front heavy.
Thanks Richard, WW
Yes, from my personal experience and from what Thierry explained to me before, I think 18.5 - 19 oz would be a lot easier to acheive the front balance that you desire. A cue at 20oz is probably going to be heavier at the butt than a cue which is lighter, I am sure you already know that.
I believe it is difficult for any cue maker to build a cue very forward balance at 20 oz unless if a very heavy shaft is utilized. Even then, I would imagine a compromise between the playability and the balance may have to be made.
If you ask me, I think it is quite a feat to have a 20 oz built with a 19 inches balance point which feels forward balance and plays well. Thierry also told me that he spends a lot of time in balancing each cue and it is the distribution of weight, not just how far the balance point is located from the butt, that counts. I find the balance of his cues one of the most evenly distributed. In my opinion, the fact that he uses no metal bolt at the A joint has a lot to do with it.
My cue only weights about 18.75 oz. I like a lighter cue because I do not really want to feel the cue after playing for say, 24 hours straight. In my experience, it helps me to mentain a smooth cueing action when I am tired after some long sections.
Is your Scruggs also 20oz or is it lighter? If it is lighter, it may feel more forward balance to you because there is less weight at the butt, plus, of course the fact that Timmy makes one of the best cues out there.
Well, these are just my humble opinions. Thank you for sharing.
If you don't mind, could I please see some pictures of your cues, I am always interested in looking at pictures of nice cues.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Richard Chan