No matter. Every amateur I see joining these opens clearly has put in the time, 550-plus Fargo or not.
are we seeing the same people? a good portion of them can't make three in a row
No matter. Every amateur I see joining these opens clearly has put in the time, 550-plus Fargo or not.
Years ago I played Josh Roberts in the Texas Open. Race to 9. He wasn't doing anything spectacular in the match early on. When he took the lead at 5-4, he started playing safeties. I was kicking the rest of the match and lost 9-4.I've played against pros when Hard Times Bellflower was still around. The novelty and excitement wears off quickly once you realize that you have absolutely no chance of winning the match- at my ability level, it is very difficult to even win a game, especially if it is winner break- the pros play such great safeties that you never really even get a shot.
If there is either a higher ranked player, Or a player that brings in a lot of either action or high calcutta bid on themselves, then it's a no brainer.With larger tournaments there is no practical way to use that sort of rule in my opinion. For reference, the Texas Open for 9 ball is at the end of the month and it sold out 160 spots in 9 minutes. The waitlist was full about 2 hours later.
I would also tend to believe that if an 800 plus Fargo player wanted to play in a particular tournament, they can probably contact the organizer to cut in line, so to speak. Especially so if their sponsor also sponsored the tournament itself.
I think that if I were to register as a lower ranked player, I would go to the organizer a couple weeks beforehand and see who was on the waitlist. If there was a pro there, I would consider giving up my spot.
Jesse Link (650) beat Justin Bergman Hill-Hill today.
i guess the blind squirrel does find a acorn occasionally.Jesse Link (650) beat Justin Bergman Hill-Hill today.
They could have standbys for walk ups. Not fool proof but a step.Follow up question: if spots are limited and you are towards/at the low end of the Fargo range, do you think etiquette requires waiting to register until late, to give as many higher rated players as possible a chance to register before you? Or is it first come first serve, and tough luck to any 810 full time pro who was hoping to make a few bucks but forgot to early-reg? Is it on the organizers to implement a "players below X rating must wait until the week before to register" type rule?
I don't think there is one. If you are donating to the prize pool for your own entertainment, but still have respect for the game, it shouldn't matter.
I think we are saying the same thing. Playing for the experience knowing you aren't going to win it.Can we just call it, playing for the Experience of it, to hopefully benefit in some way, from the experience? Seems pretty harsh, to me, the way you just put it.