leagues
First and foremost ... so everyone can have fun ... is a
1) Good handicap system ... remembering that lower handicaps have a greater margin for improvement than higher handicapped players (they have pretty well reached the peak of their game). I have played many leagues, and the league with the most discernable scoring system is the fairest, and in my opinion, that is the BCA system, from 1 to 60 for 4 player teams, and 1 to 75 for 5 player teams is the fairest. The subtle differences are recognized, whereas in APA (1 to 7) or Valley (1 to 13) those subtle differences are not recognized so much.
There is a big difference between a Valley 8.1 and a 8.4 but both are an 8 handicap, but in BCA one might be a 40 and the other a 44. I have seen 10's or 11's in Valley spot other 10's or 11's the 7 ball playing 9 ball in money games, and that should not be the case if it is a fair handicapping system. Of course, you always have sandbagging where the best player wins, just not with a big score, so he can keep his handicap down.
I think that the best 1 stop tell all barometer for a skill level would be a player's 10 ball average with at least 2 sessions under his belt. With the rating system going up to 300, like bowling, and with playing time under his belt, it shows the overall skill and problem solving abilities of the player by his rating, i.e., a 180, or 224, or a 258, or a 276.
Personally, I rate players 1 to 12 with one decimal place for 9 ball, with 12 being Efren Reyes. If I hit upon 2 players both being a 10.4, for instance, I then try to go to a second decimal place in order to determine which of the two is the better player, i.e., joe is a 10.42, tommy is 10.48, therefore bet on Tommy to win, and might be decided by something like Tommy breaks better and has a 1 ball shot more times than Joe, or Tommy is more accurate with 2 and 3 rail banks than Joe is. Some guys are better tournament players than money players, but I believe the skill rating for money is the truest rating.
2) The payback ... New players like trophies, seasoned players do not (they already have 2 big boxes of them stored away somewhere). Everyone likes to get their league money back or more at payback though ... The top players in the league count on making money by playing league, especially if they are not employed. We need leagues with substantial paybacks, so the 'SemiPro' level of player can be recognized and rewarded in the USA.
I now play in a 'Classic' league, which is BCA sanctioned, and the league sponsor, Southrock Billiards in Wichita, Ks., has a mid-session tournament after 7 weeks where they put up $1900 of their own money for the tournament, and 1st place takes home $1,000 (4 player team). Plus they have an end of session tournament where 1st place takes home $500. These are in addition to the normal league payouts, which 1st place takes $550 to $700 home for league play. The handicaps range from 1 to 60, and any team can win. 90% handicap system between difference of team handicaps. The mid and end of session tournaments are played over a weekend.
Going to Nationals is fun and exciting, but most teams that go do not have a chance at placing, and it just serves them to find out just how good some teams are, and there are a lot of good teams at Nationals. You can not go to Nationals with a mediocre team and expect to do well, it won't happen. You have to be good, not just for your town but really good, and play very solid, every member, for you to have a chance at placing decently in the National tournament. No one enjoys spending $600-$1,500 per person going to Nationals only to go 2 and out ...