Who's money is it anyway?

K

Keith Rudman

Registered
I have been reading and hearing so much about this nonprofit versus profit. Ask yourself, in the prior years before the sale was announced, how much did you hear about nonprofit. Hardly at all, right? Too much emphasis is being put on nonprofit. Is there a reason for this? Will the ACA board members benefit from the nonprofit status? Will they be spending your money on themselves and salaries and fringes?

Another thing, If John Lewis was working in the BCA and they tried to get Olympic recognition and failed. Why would it be any different now?

Where will the added money come from for the Nationals? Where and when will the nationals be?

How can you put your money into something that does not exist yet? At least with the BCA (when taken over by Griffin) there will be a date and tournament in Vegas with more than likely more added money.

Just some things to think about before abandoning ship.
 
Yeah alot of people made their living through the BCA long before this sale took place. I am not sure how everyone suddenly figures the BCA was like some kind of a holier then thou organization that gave everything they got back to the sport. It was paying off people before and now it is owned by a rich guy, if anything the big business getting into the middle of things will allow for huge marketing and advertisement for the companies through tournaments and also will then work as a huge tax writeoff. If anything the fact MG now owns the BCA will give the organisation the ability to give ALOT more back to the players, and get alot more publicity and future sponsers through business connections. But then people have had a kneejerk reaction from the getgo on this sale and no offense but most of those people are too shortsided and ignorant to make a well informed decision. The BCA is the new bandwagon, and everyone jumped on board.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top