I think I might be reaching another stage in my pool education. That came as I started PRACTICING not overreacting to bad or good shots alike. So far, it's been helping my game tremendously, as well as making my practice sessions more enjoyable and productive. I simply do not expect to play perfect pool, and when mistakes occur, I've been getting more feedback on what might need improvement in my game.
I still think there is room for an OPTIMAL release of frustration when you're dogging it badly (Reyes and Parica are good examples)... BUT, in general, I say the overwhelming majority of poolplayers suffer from a bad case of whiner's disease; pros and amateurs alike.
Pool is sort of a special case among the sports because failure is so immediate and glaring. It lends itself to frustration. Further, failure (missing, poor position, leakage in safety play, etc.) in pool may be more frequent than in most sports, where failure is far and between.
SO, my question is, which pro player do you think handles frustration most constructively? I know people are immediately going to refer to Efren, Souquet, and Thorsten... Are there any others?
I sort of like Bill Incardona's ethic in his commentary. He emphasizes taking no shot for granted, and accepting what the table gives you. I have never seen him play, but I imagine from his commentary alone that he may be a strong candidate for having a sound mental game.
Thanks.
I still think there is room for an OPTIMAL release of frustration when you're dogging it badly (Reyes and Parica are good examples)... BUT, in general, I say the overwhelming majority of poolplayers suffer from a bad case of whiner's disease; pros and amateurs alike.
Pool is sort of a special case among the sports because failure is so immediate and glaring. It lends itself to frustration. Further, failure (missing, poor position, leakage in safety play, etc.) in pool may be more frequent than in most sports, where failure is far and between.
SO, my question is, which pro player do you think handles frustration most constructively? I know people are immediately going to refer to Efren, Souquet, and Thorsten... Are there any others?
I sort of like Bill Incardona's ethic in his commentary. He emphasizes taking no shot for granted, and accepting what the table gives you. I have never seen him play, but I imagine from his commentary alone that he may be a strong candidate for having a sound mental game.
Thanks.
Last edited: