For the individual players, is it worth the stress and hassle ? Look at how much grief they have gotten from this forum alone !
When the US was easily beating Europe, they were beating up on snooker players and part time pool players. That was the idea of the Mosconi cup in the first place, to establish and increase the popularity of 9ball in England and europe and it succeeded
But anyway, so when the US were beating up on Europe, the European players at the time had nothing to lose and so didn't really get any grief for losing. So what if Steve Davis lost at 9ball to the americans, he's still the 6 time snooker champion.
It's not the same today, the US are getting a ton of grief for losing.
I think the best strategy is to get rid of all of the oldies including Archer and have SVB lead a team of youngsters. The fact they were will youngsters will inheritantly reduce the pressure on them to win, kinda like being a snooker player playing 9ball part time.
When the US was easily beating Europe, they were beating up on snooker players and part time pool players. That was the idea of the Mosconi cup in the first place, to establish and increase the popularity of 9ball in England and europe and it succeeded
But anyway, so when the US were beating up on Europe, the European players at the time had nothing to lose and so didn't really get any grief for losing. So what if Steve Davis lost at 9ball to the americans, he's still the 6 time snooker champion.
It's not the same today, the US are getting a ton of grief for losing.
I think the best strategy is to get rid of all of the oldies including Archer and have SVB lead a team of youngsters. The fact they were will youngsters will inheritantly reduce the pressure on them to win, kinda like being a snooker player playing 9ball part time.