WPBA Tournament in Michigan

[Joe_Jaguar]

Ah so they use the attendance record in order to calculate seedings. Fargo is pretty good actually, but I do understand that when people are lower than what their ego thinks it is, they generally say Fargo is crap.

Good luck with that. If you are too dumb to acknowledge it isn't a "bizarre" notion to seed their events based off of who actually shows up and how they've performed.

Next we'll get an idiot saying they should be using Mathroom points.

Adios.

 

[FastManners]

Good luck with that. If you are too dumb to acknowledge it isn't a "bizarre" notion to seed their events based off of who actually shows up and how they've performed.

Next we'll get an idiot saying they should be using Mathroom points.

Adios.

Point taken. It depends on what their goal of seeding is. Is it to make for a better tournament by seeding better players or to reward people for loyally attending?
I would suggest that having players seeded by known ability, is going to make for a better tournament, than seeding them as per attendance, but that is just me.
Each to their own.

 

[hang-the-9]

You’re being very generous - there are numerous WPBA tour regulars that would have Fargo ratings in the 500’s.

Yes, I was really just talking about the world ranking not the US tournaments. I think it's just one of those things we will never have a real answer to, why in sports that are not physical are women still behind the men. I wonder how the darts and bowling ratings compare vs men, is there a darts Fargo rating?