How is this the fault of APA? This is a problem with this particular team.
I wish that I could agree with you, but there are several teams in that division that do the same thing. It's almost a contest: Who can sandbag the most? I've played in regional singles many times, and my teams have played in our city championships many times. I'm not talking about a one-time occurrence here. If I had never seen it before, I would have stayed on the team and notified the LO. Instead, it was just a stark reminder of all the BS I had to put up with in the past in this division. I assumed that nothing had changed, so I left. Perhaps I was too quick to judge, based on that one observation.
Any handicapped league is going to have sandbaggers. The local leagues (BCA, APA, NPA, TAP) in this area do not have a problems with cheaters/sandbaggers.
You'll have to explain this one to me. It seems a bit contradictory. Aren't those all handicapped leagues? Or are you delineating between "local" vs Vegas-bound leagues?
I haven't played NPA, but our TAP league was not nearly as bad as the APA league. My whole point is that "Any handicapped league is going to have sandbaggers," but if the league is slow to take action, or quick to look the other way, then maybe these leagues just aren't for me.
Yes, there is some tiny bit of satisfaction in hearing that the sandbagger who put you out of the tournament two rounds ago has been DQ'd, but it doesn't make up for getting cheated out of your chance to compete.
I also agree with one of the previous posts, which pointed out that mathematically, the larger number of players in the APA could be a reason that I see it more often there. But that still doesn't make it okay.
I don't see any sandbagging in my BCA league. Maybe it would be more evident if we were playing for a trip to Vegas. I don't know. At least in BCA, sandbagging hurts your team score since you pay for your lower rank with points. Anyway, it seems to at least be more complicated and difficult to sandbag in BCA, while still winning your division.
Actually had you bothered to read the APA manual you would know that APA is pretty serious about preventing sandbagging.
Yeah, well, I'm not going to get all heated because of your language here. You've never met me, so you would have no way of knowing that as a captain, not only did I read the manuals, I kept them with me in my pool bag, and memorized where to find many rules by page number. I read them often and thoroughly. I'm "that guy" in league that people call to watch shots or answer rule questions. That's precisely why it makes me so mad that they didn't follow through with their "very serious" attitude against preventing sandbagging.
And maybe that's a more accurate point: That they do a fair job of *addressing* and *punishing* sandbagging once it becomes obvious, but they do a very poor job of *preventing* sandbagging. Anyone who has studied the economics of incentives can see that the "Equalizer" is a perfect example of providing all the incentives to sandbag, and almost none to play honestly (other than personal integrity, which some people lack).
When we did well that year in Vegas, we had three teams that we didn't know, from different parts of the country, come to us and tell us that they had notified the TD about the obviously sandbagging teams that we were about to play. Shortly after our matches with them started, we also notified the TD. It wasn't until their fourth match "on TD watch" that they were DQ'd. This was true for both of the teams that beat us. Obviously, they were the only two teams that beat us.
Anyway, it doesn't really matter whose "fault" it is. I just don't enjoy the overall experience, especially when I feel powerless to do anything about it. The cheaters and lack of enforcement spoil the fun for me.
Those bad apples DID ruin the whole bunch for me.
-Blake