Which Instructor ? ??
- Thread starter BmoreMoney
- Start date
Did you not see my last post. That should be ALL that I need say.
But...
I certainly do not despise Stan & I truly indeed have given him appreciative & approving thumbs up on several posts that he has made.
I don't hold grudges & I do not 'judge' every aspect by another singular aspect.
I do not agree with how he describes his aiming 'system' & I am befuddled at how he maintains that it is such & I am certainly not fond of him saying some of the things that he has said about those that are not in agreement with him including me.
But you are like some others & think that you are omniscient & can read the hearts & minds of others.
In the heat of 'battle' Stan has not been & unless something changes certainly will not be close to one of my favorite people but I don't hold grudges.
I am perplexed by how Stan chooses to describe his aiming method & how he seems to not be able to see or willing to admit the reality & that has caused me to consider every possibility as to why it seems that he can not see or will not admit the reality.
In any case, you've now admitted your motives for stalking around behind me in rather many threads & you really do seem to be one that projects yourself & how you are out onto others. I sincerely hope & pray that that is NOT a 100% true trait of yourself. In any case you need to realize that everyone is not like you.
Some, like myself have an affinity for the truth.
I would not recommend Stan's aiming method to anyone thinking that it is an objective aiming 'system' & does not realize that it will still require their subjectively learned 'aiming' skills. If they realize such then certainly they should do as they please & will not be disappointed when knowing such going in.
Last edited:
You can say it Rick, TOI 'System' it won't hurt too bad.
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=362504&highlight=Touch+inside
Tell me would CJ's TOI System be a cookie cutter way to play?
I'd hardly call using the squirt of the cue ball as the main means of getting the cue ball to the point(s) on the object ball so that it pockets...a cookie cutter way to play.
Perhaps if you or anyone else is interested they can start a poll to see how many on AZB play that way.
It is a very dynamic method that is dependent on the proper amount of speed combined with the proper amount of tip offset...
but it can be every effective, but hardly a cookie cutter method.
CJ NEVER promoted or suggested that his version of TOI was an aiming system.
When put together with other methods & aspects of play one might then call it a system of various methods or components.
sys·tem
ˈsistəm/Submit
noun
1.
a set of connected things or parts forming a complex whole, in particular.
2.
a set of principles or procedures according to which something is done; an organized scheme or method.
So... unlike the the single component of 'aiming' CJ formed or organized a scheme or method of play that were connected to the TOI method in that even when he used outside english he originates it based on as if the shot were going to be shot with the TOI before adjusting.
The word system alone by itself has a meaning as defined.
When the word is put into a phrase it can either fit appropriately or it can inappropriately not fit.
CJ Wiley has a systemic method of playing the game or he has a system for playing the game that he implements. He calls it the TOI System.
So & so has a system of spinning the cylinder when playing Russian Roulette. Or so & so promotes what he calls an objective aiming system.
Those are an example of both an appropriate fit & inappropriate fits.
I can see no system to the random spinning of a cylinder...
& since there can really be no truly complete objective system that any normal human being would be capable of implementing, it would be an inappropriate fit there in that it implies something that is not.
All that said, I really do not see the point of your post.
I guess it was just your turn to stand the post.
Perhaps if you or anyone else is interested they can start a poll to see how many on AZB play that way.
It is a very dynamic method that is dependent on the proper amount of speed combined with the proper amount of tip offset...
but it can be every effective, but hardly a cookie cutter method.
CJ NEVER promoted or suggested that his version of TOI was an aiming system.
When put together with other methods & aspects of play one might then call it a system of various methods or components.
sys·tem
ˈsistəm/Submit
noun
1.
a set of connected things or parts forming a complex whole, in particular.
2.
a set of principles or procedures according to which something is done; an organized scheme or method.
So... unlike the the single component of 'aiming' CJ formed or organized a scheme or method of play that were connected to the TOI method in that even when he used outside english he originates it based on as if the shot were going to be shot with the TOI before adjusting.
The word system alone by itself has a meaning as defined.
When the word is put into a phrase it can either fit appropriately or it can inappropriately not fit.
CJ Wiley has a systemic method of playing the game or he has a system for playing the game that he implements. He calls it the TOI System.
So & so has a system of spinning the cylinder when playing Russian Roulette. Or so & so promotes what he calls an objective aiming system.
Those are an example of both an appropriate fit & inappropriate fits.
I can see no system to the random spinning of a cylinder...
& since there can really be no truly complete objective system that any normal human being would be capable of implementing, it would be an inappropriate fit there in that it implies something that is not.
All that said, I really do not see the point of your post.
I guess it was just your turn to stand the post.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I would go with Tor Lowry who does the Zero X.
I have DVDs from many of those listed and Tor is the only one that doesn't have some gimick or short cut.
Just doing the first simple drill that he recommends of shooting thousands of balls into a pocket has really helped me. He has no short cuts, just practice and repetition.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Rick...Your "dumbass" quotient is showing. Randy Goettlicher was the FIRST Master Instructor. Fran came long after.
There are different levels of certified instructors because more knowledge equates to higher level instruction (most of the time). Sadly there are a few Master Instructors who cannot play and cannot teach well...certainly none of the instructors Randy or I have certified fall into this catagory.
Smoothstroke learned what he knows from Randyg. That should tell you something...
Once again, you show that you have a closed mind, and cannot nor will not open it even a little, so that you might be able to learn somthing new. BTW, good job hogging the thread. You've got 40 out of 99 posts in this thread! Egads!
Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com
There are different levels of certified instructors because more knowledge equates to higher level instruction (most of the time). Sadly there are a few Master Instructors who cannot play and cannot teach well...certainly none of the instructors Randy or I have certified fall into this catagory.
Smoothstroke learned what he knows from Randyg. That should tell you something...
Once again, you show that you have a closed mind, and cannot nor will not open it even a little, so that you might be able to learn somthing new. BTW, good job hogging the thread. You've got 40 out of 99 posts in this thread! Egads!
Scott Lee
http://poolknowledge.com
Last edited:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm an awesome teacher, and I use shortcuts.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^