"True Banks" Table

Patrick Johnson

Fargo 1000 on VP4
Silver Member
I just happened across this old drawing in my file and thought it might be of interest. It's a table with a "true" banking/kicking grid on it that equally divides the area between the gutters rather than between the cushion noses. This results in a grid that doesn't line up exactly with the diamonds (except the center diamonds in each direction), but does show where "equal angles" go in real life.

For a little extra accuracy the gutter is shown 1/4" closer to the rail than a half ball's width to account for the fact that balls sink into the cushions a little before they rebound. This is a guess at the average distance balls sink into the cushion for an average range of shot speeds (if you measure the gutter on a table you'll see it's a thick line because of this variance in rail compression, and its center is closer to the rail than 1/2 ball's width), and is at least a little underestimated because it doesn't take into account the fact that balls take a curved "shortcut" when they rebound and their centers never reach the pointed apex of the rebound angle, which is even closer to the rail. If this "shortcut" was taken into account the gutter would be even closer to the rail - for a hard-hitting game like banks both the rail compression and the radius of the curved shortcut are larger so the gutter might move all the way to the rail and the grid would line up with the diamonds again.

Apparently I have too much time on my hands. Anybody need their lawn mowed?

pj
chgo

P.S. The subdivisions are 1/10 of the major divisions - 1.25 inches for a grid lined up with the diamonds and a little less for a "true" grid.

pool table - true divisions.jpg
 
Last edited:
I just happened across this old drawing in my file and thought it might be of interest. It's a table with a "true" banking/kicking grid on it that equally divides the area between the gutters rather than between the cushion noses. ...
Well, yes, but while the correct target for the corner pockets is in the expected place (at the corners of the major grid), the side pocket targets are not.
 
Bob Jewett:
...while the correct target for the corner pockets is in the expected place (at the corners of the major grid), the side pocket targets are not.

Sorry, I don't understand this. If you're saying that the correct side pocket target is not midway between the side pocket points at the gutter, I agree, but the "true" grid isn't intended to show the correct pocket targets, only to show the symmetrical grid for ball travel that actually fits within the cushions.

pj
chgo
 
Last edited:
By the way, if you're wondering what the usefulness of this is, the answer is not much. It's mostly a curiosity for those, like me, who are entirely too anal about pool.

pj
chgo
 
Sorry, I don't understand this. If you're saying that the correct side pocket target is not midway between the side pocket points at the gutter, I agree, but the "true" grid isn't intended to show the correct pocket targets, only to show the symmetrical grid for ball travel that actually fits within the cushions.

pj
chgo
Well, yes, but I was just pointing out that for four of the pockets the grid would easily give the banking target while for the other two pockets you need to select a target that is not exactly on the major grid lines. (The best target for the side pockets seems to be at the intersection of the centerstring and the pocket drops. It's not much different from the major grid intersection, but it's comparable to the other corrections in this discussion.
 
Back
Top