WOW! I never expected that from you Roger. It seems that SPF instructors gets in all of their free advertisement.
While Gene has said that he plays far better than steve and others who teach, it sure seems odd that you would attempt to discredit him on this forum. It seems like you are playing a similar game, except you aren't naming names of the critics. I don't doubt that you have spoken to someone but reporting someone else's report is kind of brutal.
You nor SPF would want me or anyone else to report negative things that some people have told me off of the forum.
Telling someone else that they aren't a professional instructor is a little over the top. I think Gene gets paid for his instructing and lessons and that makes him a professional.
Your attempt to discredit Gene is out of character for you and SPF.
JoeyA
Quote:
Originally Posted by genomachino
Hi there,
I just needed to say something.
How can teachers that are supposed to teach people be critical of something that they know almost nothing about. Or should I say just enough to be dangerous.
With Perfect Aim the individual can find where their perfect spot is for every shot. It also will teach the player how to find the perfect spot themselves after they understand it for all their shots.
Many of the things we learn with pool are self taught. Trial and error. Many of the mistakes we do with pool we do over and over and still make the same mistakes unless we know how to correct the problem. This is why we sometimes seem to be stuck at one level for a long time.
The pool teachers out there are a great help because they can help identify the problem for the player and there for make a correction that will improve their pool game. This serves a purpose for all pool players and is a great need for someone that is trying to improve their game.
I feel bad when teachers that are supposed to help ridicule something like Perfect Aim without knowing hardly anything about it only because they might just stop one person form learning this and improving the game they love and enjoy.
I was cleaning out my car the other day without my glasses on. As I was doing so I accidently threw away a check for a couple hundred dollars that I got from a little pool tournament.
I strongly recommend that you put your glasses on when you look at Perfect Aim so you can make an educated opinion instead of a "MY DAD CAN BEAT UP YOUR DAD" type of statement without proper knowledge about what you are talking about.
Someday the nay say teachers out there will see Perfect AIM and wish they could have been teaching it for a long time. Just think of how many players you could help showing Perfect Aim instead of ridiculing it.
The teachers that I have taught Perfect Aim to have had their eyes opened to something very helpful to themselves and all pool players.
Columbus once said the world was round. They used to burn people at the stake if they didn't understand them, Witches. And some people burned books over time to supress knowledge that they thought noone should know.
Get the picture. Enough said. Buy the video and see what you are missing.
Have a great day Gene with PERFECT AIM..................
Quote:
Originally posted by shankster8:
I really believe that this is just another example of a bunch of words intended to mislead everyone, and create mystique about something undeserving of it. Perfect Aim is nothing more than centering the cue between your eyes. Your head position is then within 1/8 of an inch of being in "perfect aim". Since your eyes are about 30 inches from the cueball, how much effect on sighting is a 1/8 inch head movement going to make? If "Perfect Aim" is anything other than a requirement to center the cue, I again ask Gene to correct me - like I've asked several times previously in other posts - but I've never got a reply.
When I spoke on the phone with Gene, we broke no new ground, because I already centered the cue. Yet he subsequently posted to the effect that he was happy to have helped me and was sure I was now shooting better as a result of "Perfect Aim" blah, blah, blah. He should have not have posted misleading statements using me as a tool, I believe.
Also, I believe it is noteworthy that neither Shooting Arts nor Spider ever came back with the reviews we were all anticipating. The silence of these two outspoken and intelligent AZBr's speaks loudly, I believe.
Todays reply from shankster8:
Joey, no harm intended, just trying to help keep things on the up and up, as I believe Roger is. Perhaps you will answer the question that Gene and all his endorsers seem afraid to. If you center your cue between your eyes, are you then within 1/8 inch of your eyes being in the perfect spot? Yes or No? Thanks
,