Alleged padding of B&R's in the UPL tourney?? WTF?
- Thread starter KoolKat9Lives
- Start date
You got that right.
My point was that its a shame there isnt much honor in pool, and tourneys arent well enough run and funded to have objective people keep score.
If I woulda personally witnessed something I would speak up, but people did witness things and wrote letters and nothing was done
I would take even money there are more than one sir
This thread just pisses me off, I read the whole thing.
You have some posting that they talked to eye witnesses who said the B&R's didnt happen. If I had a friend that told me that, I would have no reason to think he is lying? Three people write up what they see, one signs his name, none of them say they saw 10 B&R's, just that they saw some B&R's. People write bad so how there handwriting looks should not be considered, thats just a bad reason for not believing them or thinking they are up to something. And, if three people who are watching the same match say they each saw 4 B&R's that doesnt mean there were 12. I dont get how there were people there saying that the 10 B&R's didnt happen and yet we get this arguement that theres no hard evidence?? Eye witnesses dont count? Are you calling these people liars? Maybe they dont like confrontation and have decided not to do anymore than to write a note or tell a friend what they saw so they can avoid the confrontation.
Eraser marks on a score sheat is not that big a deal unless you have multiple players and spectators saying that they didnt see 10 B&R's out of 15 games. If that really happened you would have heard wispering or talk around or near the match as it was taking place about how good they were playing. Did anyone hear any of this?
There are multiple people saying they have witnesses that say the B&R's didnt happen.
IS THERE EVEN ONE PERSON/PLAYER BESIDES THE TWO IN QUESTION THAT SAY THEY SAW THE 10 B&R'S??? NOT ON THIS FORUM HAS THERE BEEN ONE.
There hasnt even been one saying that they had a "friend" that was there that saw the 10 B&R's?????
Keep avoiding the obvious and excusing the guilty and nothing will change.
Nate.
You have some posting that they talked to eye witnesses who said the B&R's didnt happen. If I had a friend that told me that, I would have no reason to think he is lying? Three people write up what they see, one signs his name, none of them say they saw 10 B&R's, just that they saw some B&R's. People write bad so how there handwriting looks should not be considered, thats just a bad reason for not believing them or thinking they are up to something. And, if three people who are watching the same match say they each saw 4 B&R's that doesnt mean there were 12. I dont get how there were people there saying that the 10 B&R's didnt happen and yet we get this arguement that theres no hard evidence?? Eye witnesses dont count? Are you calling these people liars? Maybe they dont like confrontation and have decided not to do anymore than to write a note or tell a friend what they saw so they can avoid the confrontation.
Eraser marks on a score sheat is not that big a deal unless you have multiple players and spectators saying that they didnt see 10 B&R's out of 15 games. If that really happened you would have heard wispering or talk around or near the match as it was taking place about how good they were playing. Did anyone hear any of this?
There are multiple people saying they have witnesses that say the B&R's didnt happen.
IS THERE EVEN ONE PERSON/PLAYER BESIDES THE TWO IN QUESTION THAT SAY THEY SAW THE 10 B&R'S??? NOT ON THIS FORUM HAS THERE BEEN ONE.
There hasnt even been one saying that they had a "friend" that was there that saw the 10 B&R's?????
Keep avoiding the obvious and excusing the guilty and nothing will change.
Nate.
