At a barbox 8 ball tournament this past weekend, a rather interesting situation came up. I will refer to the two players as player x and player y. I believe player x had maybe 2 balls left on the table and player y had 5 or 6. Player y had just played a safe, leaving player x in a very bad spot. Player x responded by cueing up on the 8 ball and pushing it to a location that made the rack rather problematic for player y.
I'm curious if anyone has ever heard of such a thing? What is the actual ruling on someone cueing up on an object ball and shooting it, without making an attempt at using the cueball? I could not find anything in the BCA rules for this.
Being that I was the tournament director, I had to make the final ruling. I called it an automatic loss of game. My opinion was this: if a player accidentally moves an object ball, it gets moved back. If a player intentionally changes the layout of the table, without making an effort to use the cueball, it should be considered a conceded game. I compared it to a player taking his cue and wiping the table.
As for the final outcome of the incident: the two players agreed to replay the game.
Opinions?
I'm curious if anyone has ever heard of such a thing? What is the actual ruling on someone cueing up on an object ball and shooting it, without making an attempt at using the cueball? I could not find anything in the BCA rules for this.
Being that I was the tournament director, I had to make the final ruling. I called it an automatic loss of game. My opinion was this: if a player accidentally moves an object ball, it gets moved back. If a player intentionally changes the layout of the table, without making an effort to use the cueball, it should be considered a conceded game. I compared it to a player taking his cue and wiping the table.
As for the final outcome of the incident: the two players agreed to replay the game.
Opinions?