"Did You Ever Have To Make Up Your Mind?"

H

hoser128

New member
After alot of research on my next cue, I've located two within my price range that I really like. One is a Richard Chudy RC3, very subdued and classy (available immediately), while the other is an ArnotQ, a little more ornate but still very classy (8-10 week wait).

The reviews and comments here have all been extremely positive about these two makers.

I hate to put y'all on the spot, but what factors would sway you one way or the other?

Many thanks...Neil
 
How about Rick Howard and Mike Stacey?

I'm new to this custom cue market, so I'd really appreciate some feedback.

Thanks...Neil
 
hoser128 said:
After alot of research on my next cue, I've located two within my price range that I really like. One is a Richard Chudy RC3, very subdued and classy (available immediately), while the other is an ArnotQ, a little more ornate but still very classy (8-10 week wait).

The reviews and comments here have all been extremely positive about these two makers.

I hate to put y'all on the spot, but what factors would sway you one way or the other?

Many thanks...Neil
Click to expand...

things that sway me are price, design, and how I think the cue will play. I like stiff hitting cues, so I tend to buy from makers that I know make cues like that.

I consider things like balance point, shaft taper, woods used, price, and lastly delivery time when I order new cues.

All the makers you've suggested make fine cues. Buy something you like, ideally from a maker you've had a chance to try out, and then stick with it.

Or if you are into cues more than shooting just buy cues that look good and have good resale.
 
Thanks, guys. How about Bender and Paul Drexler?

Why is it that Howard seems to build "players" cues, but doesn't get a lot of press from the dealers?
 
hoser128 said:
After alot of research on my next cue, I've located two within my price range that I really like. One is a Richard Chudy RC3, very subdued and classy (available immediately), while the other is an ArnotQ, a little more ornate but still very classy (8-10 week wait).

The reviews and comments here have all been extremely positive about these two makers.

I hate to put y'all on the spot, but what factors would sway you one way or the other?

Many thanks...Neil
Click to expand...



Neil it all depends if you are buying the cue to use as a player or if it is going into a collection. I am certain that both of your chosen cue makers will build you a great cue and that you will have no problems. But, if you are going to buy a player I would never buy a new cue that I could not hit balls with. Buddy no two cues hit the same, while most of the better cue makers get close in most cases there can be no guaranty.

If your buying a cue for your collection it doesn't really matter too much, but if you are buying a cue as a player you have to hit some balls with it before you buy. For players I always recommend buying cues that are used and that you can try out for a period of time. This way you will know if you are buying what you want, cues are not like socks, or anything else one size doesn't always fit the buyers needs.

Good Luck
 
Lovin Spoonful

Did you ever have to make up your mind
Pick up on one (RC3) and leave the other behind
It's not often easy and not often kind
Did you ever have to make up your mind

Alan Hopkins is playing with a 4-point Richard Chudy..
He really loves the cue.
I think RC builds outstanding cues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top