i agree
I know its not comparable to pool im just sticking up for poker a little bit. more luck but i still think it aint close to those other things because of abilitly of it being something to accomplish thats possible and the others not. thanks for the response.
DogsPlayingPool
Real name: Turd Ferguson
I agree there is more skill in poker than some other gambling propositions. But it still has a significant amount of luck attached to it. It is not even comparable to pool in terms of being a game of skill. A Chris Moneymaker can come out of nowhere and win the main event at the WS, but there is no way I'm winning the U.S. Open 10 Ball and there are far fewer competitors to beat and I would only have to beat about 8 of them. It is one reason poker has gotten so big - it is possible with luck, for just about anyone who is decent at the game to win if the cards go his way at the right times. In pool, I don't care how many rolls a "decent" player gets, he's not taking down a big event - ever.
Yes, I agree there is more skill to poker than the other things I mentioned, but I wasn't arguing that. But poker still falls way closer to those games than it does to pool in regard to the level of skill versus luck.
I know its not comparable to pool im just sticking up for poker a little bit. more luck but i still think it aint close to those other things because of abilitly of it being something to accomplish thats possible and the others not. thanks for the response.