Neil, why do people, who, by their own admission, couldn't tell you the difference between a secant and a centroid, believe their assertions are correct against the admonitions of those who do know geometry, a few of which teach university level courses in engineering/physics? Why do the proponents continue to see themselves as budding Galileos persecuted by The Inquisition, when in fact they're doing a much better imitation of Simplicio? Why do they not take the hint and stop with the false claims?
Eternal mysteries.
Jim
Because it's the people who could make fire without understanding it on the atomic level who made it possible for universities to exist. Phenomena exists and it's your job to explain it and figure it out.
What claims are false?
I have tried CTE for just about every type of shot on the table and have not found one yet where I can't use it. Maybe you can diagram some shots where the object ball is to be shot directly into a pocket which you think CTE cannot be used and I will shoot them using CTE on video.
Two days ago I did a video demonstration for my friend and he told me where to put the balls and I did and proved that each shot wanted to see could be made with CTE.
So again, what claims are false?