I've said it many times before, and I'll say it again. If there's one thing that really turns my stomach, it's bare tits on my back.
I'm sorry, but it has to be said. :smile:
I'm sorry, but it has to be said. :smile:
Hmm. A timely topic.
Where's the line? IMO, for any decent person, the line is clear. When you cross into someone's personal life to the point where you can cause some actual harm THAT IS OVER THE LINE.
Trying to call someone's employer, harassing their family members, etc are some of the things I feel are way past just barking at someone.
Whats the retribution for a dirtbag move like that? Well, that just depends on the individual and how crazy they are.
Eric
I've said it many times before, and I'll say it again. If there's one thing that really turns my stomach, it's bare tits on my back.
I'm sorry, bu tit has to be said. :smile:
So Eric, if I told you there were a bunch of people that were directly harrassed outside of this forum, by a forum member, and he has threatened to do harm to that person by any means necessary, including using the IRS, or local authorities, that would be over the line in your opinion.
JV
Joe,
imo, that is waaaay over the line. Whomever did something like that deserves the old testament treatment. You know, the eye for an eye thing...
Eric
John,
You refuse to see it, and all this diatribe thats fine. But you think as shown in the post, that you are the victim. Well its bullsh*t, you have gone after people for small disagreements with you. As we will demonstrate, John. You called the local authorities on Jack because you were insulted.
On top of that, you did to him, what you have done to me, post an apology and I'll drop it. Thats EXTORTION. That minimizes whatever hurt you think has been done to you. Really an online apology is ok for something you now claim allows you to go after people at any cost? Really?
Now supposedly you come back a new.. well, now you leave snarky remarks in the rep area, so they really cannot be tracked.
YOU INVITE the conflict as evident in those reps. Just now its a little more hidden. You still can't stay out of threads and like you've told me you'll use all my threads to to promote your product. Well now you've overstepped.
You look for forgiveness because the time for this to end, is now. But you don't want anyone to know how deep this really is.
Your posts in the other thread are offensive to the people that you have victimized with your "payback". These people come at you because of you, nothing else. Not because you're far away, not because your thinking is not in line with theirs, but because you invite it.
So tell us, what was so bad that Jack did to cause you calling Florida to shut him down?
What did Eric do?
What did this guy who had ONE interaction on line do for you to stalk him all over facebook and threaten him?
Its one altercation, what could have been bad? The fact is YOU don't like to be argued with or questions and its YOU that needs to back off.
So the new MO is to leave snarky rep???? It's not bait? Or instigation? OK We believe you, because you've proven to be so stellar. Looks to me like the instigation isn't from others as you claim.
I am not the only person to get these, BTW.
JV
That was two years ago Joe. And no I don't go after people for small disagreements. Never have and never will..
Drop what? Post an apology and I will drop what? I did ask Jack several times to post an apology for falsely accusing me on this forum of importing no-name cases that he felt were copies of his designs.
What constitutes "over the line" behavoir? Think about it, with all the forum flame fests you may see, what do you classify as over the line behavoir?
Some meaningless name calling?
Would it be, stalking people off the forum via e-mail or facebook?
Would it be leaving your messages in the rep area so they couldn't be seen by others, other than the intended target?
Would it be calling their actual work related professions or trying to do damage off the forum in someones personal life?
Just curious to what people would feel unsecure with having happen to them?
So if any of these would happen to you, which would bother you the most?
JV
What is this in reference to? You consider this statement to be mean? Man you are really reaching here for someone that makes tons of snide comments intended to put me down in public. I send you a comment that isn't even mean by way of rep that only you can see and this is somehow bad and harassing but when you make really mean and awful comments in public it's ok?
John, you can't honestly think that you're the victim here, can you? You seem to find yourself in these little online tiffs on a monthly basis. You've been banned here more than almost any other member. And frankly, whether someone says something to ruffle your feathers, responding in the way you do if not online incredibly juvenile, its borderline psychotic. The truth is, you LOVE these little online arguments. You thrive on them. I remember when Edwin Reyes passed. You had a great epiphany. You realized that life was too short for petty online arguments and you would no longer involve yourself in any. I think that probably lasted a 3 - 4 months which, frankly... I'm shocked you made it that long. You go on tilt more often, more easily, and way further than anyone on these forums.
If someone made a comment about child labor, why call the authorities on him for his labor practices? The two aren't even close to the same ball park.
I have said no such thing to you Joe. Another fabrication. What I said was that EVERY time you make a remark intended to put me down or hurt my business then you only give me a platform to further promote my products. It's true. If you make a remark that my cases are crap or that they are copies then all you do is allow me a space to rebut that with evidence to the contrary. I have thanked you for providing these opportunities. Surely you don't feel that you should be allowed to make such remarks without them being countered? .
Oh please, how deep? You have made a continuous running attack on me for decades. At shows you act like nothing happened and we are buddies and then a week later you are attacking me again. .
You guys were really great at putting me on tilt. Jack is awesome at the snide remark and he started a major rift with his false accusations. You lie constantly about me and my business and my products.
So yes, Joe it's very deep but in fact it's only deep because you have made it a point to attack me from every vector you could think of.
Again Joe, the attacks started on me not the other way around. I didn't attack Jack Justis, I didn't attack you, I didn't attack anyone FIRST. I don't care WHY you "came at me" the point is that you did and you all have constantly made it personal attacking me with every kind of slur you get away with. .
Did he call Xiamen to see if you were legit? Did authorities show at your door? Do you have an e-mail from him saying he would forget about it if he apologized to you?I didn't try to shut Jack down. He called into question my licensing on the open forum and so I looked into his. Fair is fair..
What? What guy? The guy who makes cat boxes who went off on me while I was banned saying I compete unfairly and use slave labor and toxic materials? Yeah, since I couldn't address his accusations on AZB I looked him up on facebook and addressed them there. I didn't threaten him at all. .
I remember back in the day when people could just ignore others without feeling the need to argue or start sht....want to say early 2000s.