If so, it’s often an artificial neutrality. Strained.
Commentators are, for the most part, human. They have favorites, they have adversaries, styles they admire, strategies they detest, players they loathe.
From a profit perspective -- if DVDs of a PPV match are later going to be sold -- perhaps impartiality is for the best.
Or, perhaps not.
I think that allowing on-air pool personalities to reveal their honest rooting interests would add color to the color commentary. (I’m not referring to those late night, drunken rants ... although those can be fun in their own way!)
Perhaps -- during a two-in-the-booth presentation -- it would add even more zest if each analyst were sincerely cheering for a different player.
My guess is that pool streaming took its cue from televised sporting events. (ESPN may have been the bridge?)
On TV, we find such a buttoned-down objectivity to the commentary -- such a politically-correct blandness -- that their self-enforced neutrality stands in rather sharp counterpoint to any on-screen excitement.
I think that this blather-boringness may be one reason why, these days, so many viewers watch television in conjunction with social media … these hyper-engaged spectators create instant community rooting sections that are otherwise uninspired by ‘professional’ announcers.
Commentary on commentary is my life,
Sunny
P. S. One positive variation that could possibly spike pool-viewing interests would be to have a girl (yes, a girl!) behind one of the mics. During the boys’ competitions.
That may occasionally happen? But I imagine it’s fairly recherché, mon cher.
Commentators are, for the most part, human. They have favorites, they have adversaries, styles they admire, strategies they detest, players they loathe.
From a profit perspective -- if DVDs of a PPV match are later going to be sold -- perhaps impartiality is for the best.
Or, perhaps not.
I think that allowing on-air pool personalities to reveal their honest rooting interests would add color to the color commentary. (I’m not referring to those late night, drunken rants ... although those can be fun in their own way!)
Perhaps -- during a two-in-the-booth presentation -- it would add even more zest if each analyst were sincerely cheering for a different player.
My guess is that pool streaming took its cue from televised sporting events. (ESPN may have been the bridge?)
On TV, we find such a buttoned-down objectivity to the commentary -- such a politically-correct blandness -- that their self-enforced neutrality stands in rather sharp counterpoint to any on-screen excitement.
I think that this blather-boringness may be one reason why, these days, so many viewers watch television in conjunction with social media … these hyper-engaged spectators create instant community rooting sections that are otherwise uninspired by ‘professional’ announcers.
Commentary on commentary is my life,
Sunny
P. S. One positive variation that could possibly spike pool-viewing interests would be to have a girl (yes, a girl!) behind one of the mics. During the boys’ competitions.
That may occasionally happen? But I imagine it’s fairly recherché, mon cher.
Last edited:
