What kind of a person does an instructional video in his underpants? Just wondering what kind of personality that would be.
I hadn't noticed, to be honest. Guess I wasn't focused on that aspect.

What kind of a person does an instructional video in his underpants? Just wondering what kind of personality that would be.
I hadn't noticed, to be honest. Guess I wasn't focused on that aspect.Looks like real short shorts though, not underwear. ??
What that video is --- is ridiculous.
Are you calling the content ridiculous, or just don't like the guy showing it?
I can't get past the underwear.
I can't get past the underwear.
One last time---the pendulum stroke is called that because it resembles a pendulum when viewed from the elbow. The elbow should not move much if at all, and the forearm swings. Hence, pendulum resemblance. It does NOT refer to the action of the actual pool cue.
How level the cue stays with a pendulum stroke is dependent on what type of grip you use. And, that's all it is. It is not an indicator of what type of stroke you are using.
Violinists use a bow stroke that hinges at the elbow similar to a pure pendulum stroke, only sideways. They must keep the bow going perfectly straight for the entire 24" of bow travel, not just a 2" sweet spot. If they fail to do this they will end up playing on the string adjacent to the one they intend to play on.
How is this accomplished? The answer is in the wrist, as was pointed out above regarding the pool stroke.
Okay,
Neil, I quoted you for the content but this is really directed to anyone.
Who would like to differentiate a true pendulum stroke from a true piston stroke?
I had thought in the past that some were praising a piston stroke while calling it a pendulum stroke & now from these videos it seems even more apparent, at least to me.
What is the defining difference between the two?
Thanks to anyone who undertakes the chore.
Regards to All,
google is your friend. http://billiards.colostate.edu/threads/stroke.html#pendulum
I have always thought that one of the main advantages of the so called pendulum stroke is that with no elbow drop fewer muscle groups are used in pocketing balls and moving the cue ball to the desired spot. It has definitely helped my game--and frankly that is all I am interested in.
Thanks to all.
Anyway, thanks to Chris (Renfro) for chiming in, I do believe it makes total sense, that the second lever (wrist) is what allows the arc to be more level, which in turn will allow the cue to remain more level through impact and provide that extra bit of margin for error with regards to the intended contact point. If the cue were held at a fixed point with no wrist or hand movement then I think there would be more of a true pendulum motion and the tip would only be level for a small distance as English asserted and as Bob Jewett's graph showed.
Scott
I also feel that it does not matter whether or not the elbow moves or stays still as long as the cue & the tip send the cue ball where intended & with an amount of vertical, horizontal, or combined spin that one wants to put on the ball so the results including where & how the cue ball goes after colliding with the object balls &/or the rails is as intended.
I feel that it is best accomplished most consistently if the cue & the tip is moving into & through the cue ball along a straight line path.
The wrist hinges "backwards," like a piston on a rod. An overly loose grip isn't neccessary. :thumbup:
We both agree that Happy Gilmore's mechanics are fine as long as he makes his shots and gets his position. I'm sure we both agree that the more conventional they are the better.
Sir,
No, we do NOT agree. It does not matter whether one uses 'conventional' methods or not. The bottom line is what is best for each individual, not comformity to what someone decides is conventional or right or correct.
This is the arrogance that I have a problem with.
What do you base this on? How accurately does a stroke have to be straight for a player to be consistent?
It does not have to be straight at all for an individual to be consistent. I am just saying that generally it is easier to judge a straight line than a curved line. However I have been shooting with english for many years & believe that the mind is amazing & can make amazing compensations.
I really don't understand all the fuss. Pendulum stroke has been defined so many times. If you don't understand it, or it's benefits, that's okay. If you think a piston stroke is better because it works for you, that's fine as well. None of that was the point of this thread. randyG made an assertion in another thread that the tip moved 'level' for several inches in a pendulum stroke. I did not see how that was possibly. I asked the question how that could be twice in that thread with no answer , so I opened this thread. I now have a new understanding.
I'll put it another way.
If two players have perfect repeatable (100% of the time) strokes, and one is pendulum, and the other is piston. They could go back and forth shooting the same shots, and there would never be a difference in what the CB does. Provided each shot they shoot that's the same, is shot with the same speed, same alignment, and same contact area on the CB. The contact area on the cue ball is what this is all about. What type of stroke would allow the most consistency? I agree that a technical mechanic of either stroke could produce similiar results. But what about a novice? So therefore if you already play well using one type, there wouldn't be much of a point to switching. I totally agree.
What it all comes down to is personal preference. However, that doesn't mean you shouldn't keep an open mind and be willing to try something new. I tried dropping my elbow and practiced that way for a few months. Now I don't do it anymore, or if I do, it's very minimal, and not on every single shot. That is you & that is fine. I received several PMs to just the opposite saying how much time (& money) they wasted with the 'pendulum' stroke & now that they are allowing their elbow to drop & are shooting with more of a piston motion how happy they are with their game.[/QUOTE]
I am not trying to push anyone anywhere. I was merely fostering a converation about the straightness of a pendulum stroke as asserted by randyG that I did not see & still do not see without an accomodating 'grip action'.
I thought this was a discussion forum. Why is it that there seems to be a certain 'untouchable' group or 'opinion' that is considered 'gospel'? You yourself mentioned a open mind. I have one. That is why I ask questions & am looking for answers.
Based on the answers that I have gotten I will not be changing anything that I am now doing.
To each his own & that is how it should be.
Regards,