I tend to split hairs when it comes to words in part because it's my job to do so. Clarity is especially important when documents are likely to end up in front of a judge.
Having said that, I'm not sure I really get the discussions about the best hitting cues. When you discuss a great hitting cue, should I assume that it also is a great playing cue? Is it possible that a cue with a great hit doesn't play well or do these things go hand in hand? I'm always inclined to wonder just how well a great hitting cue plays....
Some cues move the cue ball with less effort and just play well (usually for a particular person). I'm not convinced that a cue is right for me just because it has a great hit, although I do think it is pretty universal just like some cues are duds no matter whose hands they are in. Some cues that I think play great may not light someone elses fire.
I guess what I really am getting at (or trying to get at) is that a cue can be very compatible to a player's stroke and physical traits and therefore play very well while not necessarily having a "great" hit. I think, balance point, weight, diameters, material (wood type), and more factor into this.
I still think that cues could be customized to the same or similar to the extent that golf clubs are (flex, length, and a whole lot more--I'm no golfer) and would be by now if there was enough money in the game and therefore demand for it.
Another question, how do you test drive a cue to determine if it works for you?
Having said that, I'm not sure I really get the discussions about the best hitting cues. When you discuss a great hitting cue, should I assume that it also is a great playing cue? Is it possible that a cue with a great hit doesn't play well or do these things go hand in hand? I'm always inclined to wonder just how well a great hitting cue plays....
Some cues move the cue ball with less effort and just play well (usually for a particular person). I'm not convinced that a cue is right for me just because it has a great hit, although I do think it is pretty universal just like some cues are duds no matter whose hands they are in. Some cues that I think play great may not light someone elses fire.
I guess what I really am getting at (or trying to get at) is that a cue can be very compatible to a player's stroke and physical traits and therefore play very well while not necessarily having a "great" hit. I think, balance point, weight, diameters, material (wood type), and more factor into this.
I still think that cues could be customized to the same or similar to the extent that golf clubs are (flex, length, and a whole lot more--I'm no golfer) and would be by now if there was enough money in the game and therefore demand for it.
Another question, how do you test drive a cue to determine if it works for you?