Ask me too

I'm not really sure which I look at last, but last night I did a little experiment with my wife to see what she could do. I grabbed a training CB and set it up on the foot spot, and put a piece of chalk behind the center diamond on the head rail. I told her to chalk up good and line up the cue directly behind where she wanted to hit it, then to change her focus to the chalk at the other end of the table and stroke the CB without looking at it, leaving the cue in place until the ball came back.

I was surprised to see her first effort brought the CB within an inch of the tip. The Rempe ball had a nice fat chalk mark smack dab in the middle of the center. OK... try it again. Same results. Do again. The CB came back to hit the tip, and the chalk mark was perfectly centered. Then I turned the ball to the "advanced" side and picked various spots on the ball for her to try to hit, and every time she got within 1/8" or so of the intended spot. She is a rank beginner, but she has a pretty straight stroke already. She just needs to learn to aim better through lots more practice.

Now, if a beginner can get this close to the intended spot, why would an "advanced" TOI proponent decide to go against convention and focus on the CB last? I'm much more worried about how straight and pure my stroke is than any other aspect of the game. Seems to me that a perfectly straight and grooved stroke and a solid bridge will return the tip to the point of CB address without having to stare at the CB at impact.
 
I'm not really sure which I look at last, but last night I did a little experiment with my wife to see what she could do. I grabbed a training CB and set it up on the foot spot, and put a piece of chalk behind the center diamond on the head rail. I told her to chalk up good and line up the cue directly behind where she wanted to hit it, then to change her focus to the chalk at the other end of the table and stroke the CB without looking at it, leaving the cue in place until the ball came back.

I was surprised to see her first effort brought the CB within an inch of the tip. The Rempe ball had a nice fat chalk mark smack dab in the middle of the center. OK... try it again. Same results. Do again. The CB came back to hit the tip, and the chalk mark was perfectly centered. Then I turned the ball to the "advanced" side and picked various spots on the ball for her to try to hit, and every time she got within 1/8" or so of the intended spot. She is a rank beginner, but she has a pretty straight stroke already. She just needs to learn to aim better through lots more practice.

Now, if a beginner can get this close to the intended spot, why would an "advanced" TOI proponent decide to go against convention and focus on the CB last? I'm much more worried about how straight and pure my stroke is than any other aspect of the game. Seems to me that a perfectly straight and grooved stroke and a solid bridge will return the tip to the point of CB address without having to stare at the CB at impact.

Am I the so called "advanced" TOI proponent?

If so... I will attempt to answer the question.

If not I'll leave it for whom ever you are referring.

Edit: Sorry, my apology. I just 'real eyesed' that it can not be me to whom you refer as I am certainly not 'advanced' in TOI & have never claimed or said that I was. Unless of course you are trying to put words into my mouth that have never come from my mouth as so many others attempt to do.

Edit #2: I don't think anyone can play very well missing the intended spot on the cue ball by 1/8 inch, especially when doing so with the advantage of a perfect set up & targeting the whole width of a piece of chalk instead of an infinitely small target of a couple of millimeters. 1/8 of an inch is basically one full tip of unintended squirt & spin.

Unless of course there is a plan for such a mis as there is in the the use of TOI or english.

If a 1/8 inch tolerance would be fine, then why would anyone pay money or freely work to improve there ability to hit the exact spot.
 
Last edited:
Fran,

I value & would like your opinion.

I am starting to consider that there might be a group on AZB that perhaps, & I say again perhaps, are a bit jealous of pros, CJ, & even an unknown like myself that can play with the more advanced techniques other than just stunning, drawing, & rolling the ball, by hitting just on the center axis.

I've only been here for 16 months but I have been distracted by much much of that time.

What do you think?

Is jealousy an issue when it comes to communications or a true lack there of here on AZB.

Does jealousy cloud some's ability to see things for what they truly are (Cue Sport Wise).

Or...is it just that they are set in their ways & resistant to anything that they can't do or are not doing?

Thanks in advance should you choose to reply & I will also understand should you choose to decline.

As Always, Best Wishes,
Rick
 
Last edited:
Fran,

I value & would like your opinion.

I am starting to consider that there might be a group on AZB that perhaps, & I say again perhaps, are a bit jealous of pros, CJ, & even an unknown like myself that can play with the more advanced techniques other than just stunning, drawing, & rolling the ball, by hitting just on the center axis.

I've only been here for 16 months but I have been distracted by much much of that time.

What do you think?

Is jealousy an issue when it comes to communications or a true lack there of here on AZB.

Does jealousy cloud some's ability to see things for what they truly are (Cue Sport Wise).

Or...is it just that they are set in their ways & resistant to anything that they can't do or are not doing?

Thanks in advance should you choose to reply & I will also understand should you choose to decline.

As Always, Best Wishes,
Rick

I don't know why people sometimes act the way they do, Rick. Sometimes I can figure it out with certain clues in some posts, but often times I just don't know what motivates someone to react in a certain way.

It's the nature of these types of forums, I guess. There's really no way to tell for sure so I try to just carry on and do my thing. If I'm hated for it or liked for it, so be it. I just try to keep the emotional stuff to a minimum. It seems to work best for me that way.

I hope that makes sense.
 
I don't know why people sometimes act the way they do, Rick. Sometimes I can figure it out with certain clues in some posts, but often times I just don't know what motivates someone to react in a certain way.

It's the nature of these types of forums, I guess. There's really no way to tell for sure so I try to just carry on and do my thing. If I'm hated for it or liked for it, so be it. I just try to keep the emotional stuff to a minimum. It seems to work best for me that way.

I hope that makes sense.

Fran,

Thanks for the reply.

Are you sure you're Italian?:wink: You must be a Northern Italian, closer to Germany.:wink:

I'll try to keep that 'emotion out' thing in mind, but my Mother was French born in 1911 & my Father was German born in 1912.

I think emotion is in my blood & pumped by my heart.

Thanks & Best Wishes,
Rick
 
Fran,

Thanks for the reply.

Are you sure you're Italian?:wink: You must be a Northern Italian, closer to Germany.:wink:

I'll try to keep that 'emotion out' thing in mind, but my Mother was French born in 1911 & my Father was German born in 1912.

I think emotion is in my blood & pumped by my heart.

Thanks & Best Wishes,
Rick

No, I'm 100% Sicilian. It took a lot of work for me to get to this point. Ha!

However, I'm very, very, very, good at waiting for the right moment to strike. It's in my blood. Sometimes I've even waited years, but when the timing is right, it's a beautiful thing. LOL
 
Last edited:
No, I'm 100% Sicilian. It took a lot of work for me to get to this point. Ha!

However, I'm very, very, very, good at waiting for the right moment to strike. It's in my blood. Sometimes I've even waited years, but when the timing is right, it's a beautiful thing. LOL

Fran,

Thanks for the laugh.

Were you that young lady in the back of the restaurant in The Godfather with the horse's head in the shopping bag?:wink:

I'm a football player. You hit me, you WILL get hit back ASAP. It will be between the lines but you will get hit. Then when it's over, if you want to do so, we can shake hands.

Please, please call me in for a little talk before you give me that two handed kiss.

Best,
Rick
 
Am I the so called "advanced" TOI proponent?

If so... I will attempt to answer the question.

If not I'll leave it for whom ever you are referring.

Edit: Sorry, my apology. I just 'real eyesed' that it can not be me to whom you refer as I am certainly not 'advanced' in TOI & have never claimed or said that I was. Unless of course you are trying to put words into my mouth that have never come from my mouth as so many others attempt to do.

Edit #2: I don't think anyone can play very well missing the intended spot on the cue ball by 1/8 inch, especially when doing so with the advantage of a perfect set up & targeting the whole width of a piece of chalk instead of an infinitely small target of a couple of millimeters. 1/8 of an inch is basically one full tip of unintended squirt & spin.

Unless of course there is a plan for such a mis as there is in the the use of TOI or english.

If a 1/8 inch tolerance would be fine, then why would anyone pay money or freely work to improve there ability to hit the exact spot.

Ha, ha! Once again you think it's all about you, and once again you be wrong. Dead wrong. Fact is, I don't really pay much attention to anything you do or say here... except when you choose to quote the entirety of one of my posts. The only thing about you that concerns me is what the over/under is on how long before Wilson pulls the plug on you again. I'm not a gambling man, but if someone puts it at one month, I gonna def take the under for $100.

Of course, if you are going to quote me, doesn't it seem prudent that you actually read and understand all of the words I write? Let me rephrase it for you. My wife, a beginner who has only a C player as a coach, hit that ball smack dab in the center whenever she was trying to, but when I asked her go well outside of her comfort zone (like low left on the 4th ring on the Rempe ball) she still got to within 1/8" of the spot without looking at the ball at all. And the only reason for using the chalk to aim at instead of an actual ball was to prevent her from accidentally swerving the cue by looking at the ball as an actual shot. The exercise was in hitting the CB without looking, not in aiming or ball pocketing.

I'm curious, though. Just how accurate does one need to be to ensure the OB will always go in the pocket if aimed correctly? Within 1/16" of the intended spot? 1/32"? Closer yet? How close do you believe you get to the "exact" spot you intend to hit, and what percent of the time do you think you hit it that accurately?

Yes, this question is for you, Mr. English, sir.
 
Ha, ha! Once again you think it's all about you, and once again you be wrong. Dead wrong. Fact is, I don't really pay much attention to anything you do or say here... except when you choose to quote the entirety of one of my posts. The only thing about you that concerns me is what the over/under is on how long before Wilson pulls the plug on you again. I'm not a gambling man, but if someone puts it at one month, I gonna def take the under for $100.

Of course, if you are going to quote me, doesn't it seem prudent that you actually read and understand all of the words I write? Let me rephrase it for you. My wife, a beginner who has only a C player as a coach, hit that ball smack dab in the center whenever she was trying to, but when I asked her go well outside of her comfort zone (like low left on the 4th ring on the Rempe ball) she still got to within 1/8" of the spot without looking at the ball at all. And the only reason for using the chalk to aim at instead of an actual ball was to prevent her from accidentally swerving the cue by looking at the ball as an actual shot. The exercise was in hitting the CB without looking, not in aiming or ball pocketing.

I'm curious, though. Just how accurate does one need to be to ensure the OB will always go in the pocket if aimed correctly? Within 1/16" of the intended spot? 1/32"? Closer yet? How close do you believe you get to the "exact" spot you intend to hit, and what percent of the time do you think you hit it that accurately?

Yes, this question is for you, Mr. English, sir.

I don't play on the vertical axis except for certain shots. I'm playing with english or TOI so there is a plan & lei way for any slight mis hit.

If playing a long shot into 4" pockets on a 9' table with a planned hit on the vertical axis, I would think one would need to hit it nearly perfectly to keep any squirt or swerve from causing a mis.

I'm a feel type player. I don't assign numbers to anything when I play. I don't think 1 & 1/2 tips at speed 3. So I can not give you an answer as to whether 1/16 of an inch off is acceptable. I just know that human beings are not perfect & will be off from time to time & will not know when it will happen. So...I don't ask myself to be perfect. I have planned for the occasional slight mis hit.

I've been back more than 2 months since my succumbing to the bait that caused my suspension. The readers are not ignorant. They can see through the camouflage.
 
Okay,

I played yesterday & fixed my CB 'last' issue. I am back to looking at the OB during the stroke.

I am not sure why I started looking at the CB 'last' on that other day, but I was playing with a different cue with a slightly larger tip & perhaps I just did not pick up on the different deflection properly for that cue & started to really focus on the amount of offset in an attempt to compensate.

I also had two(2) revelations regarding past statements that CJ has made but those are not for this time & place.

So...after setting the line with the bit or more of inside tip placement for TOI. I look at the tip near the spot on the CB. Then when I take the cue back my eyes shift to the OB during the stroke & I am now again seeing the ball go into pocket & not just hearing it do so.

The revelations have improved my TOI play & I am rather amazed at what TOI allows one to do. Perhaps it is because I never played with any real system before. I can certainly understand why CJ appeared fearless on those long 'difficult' shots. Some of what CJ has said that may have seemed to be a bit off the wall to some, is not so off the wall. It is just from out of the mind of a Champion.

Best Wishes to ALL,
Rick
 
Last edited:
Fran,

I value & would like your opinion.

I am starting to consider that there might be a group on AZB that perhaps, & I say again perhaps, are a bit jealous of pros, CJ, & even an unknown like myself that can play with the more advanced techniques other than just stunning, drawing, & rolling the ball, by hitting just on the center axis.

I've only been here for 16 months but I have been distracted by much much of that time.

What do you think?

Is jealousy an issue when it comes to communications or a true lack there of here on AZB.

Does jealousy cloud some's ability to see things for what they truly are (Cue Sport Wise).

Or...is it just that they are set in their ways & resistant to anything that they can't do or are not doing?

Thanks in advance should you choose to reply & I will also understand should you choose to decline.

As Always, Best Wishes,
Rick
Rick,
I don't understand anyone being hostile to T.O.I. seeing how the guy who preaches it is on You Tube firing in shots very effectively with it. I do, however, understand how some posters can't do it. Draw a straight line from the first diamond on either side of a short rail to the first diamond on the other short rail. Place the object ball on this line halfway between a short rail and the side pocket. Place the cue ball on the same line, same place, on the other side of the table.

For 17 years, before I watched the DVD, I would aim about 2 inches from the corner point on the short rail and deflect the ball in. (I didn't know I was deflecting it but that's another story!) It was only after I watched the DVD that I started aiming straight for the middle of the ball towards the diamond and deflecting it in. These days I'm going back and forth and can't decide where I want to settle.

So I guess I've been doing T.O.I for 17 years. The point is; there have been many, many times during those 17 years where I'd completely lost perception of how to do T.O.I. I'd do it well on Monday, and Tuesday I'd be clueless. I'd get down on the ball and say to myself. "I simply don't know what to do. I've lost the perception I had just last night. I don't know where to push off from."

I'd then go back to center ball and sometimes it would take me 2 weeks to get my perception of T.OI. back. Fortunately, this doesn't happen anymore. When I say I've practiced pocketing balls for 10,000 hours, I'm fully aware ther might be some posters who have done double, or even triple that. I stiil think I'm safe in saying I've practiced more than the vast majority of posters.

This pocketing pool balls business is an awfully difficult process. While T.O.I has obviously been proven highly effective for those who can execute it properly, and while it would be entirely improper for those who can't execute it to be jealous of those who can, my own experiences teach me that it's perfectly understandable that some posters might not have any perception of how to execute it whatsoever. That being said, I don't believe T.O.I is necessarily an advanced technique. I believe some of those who are able to pick it up are middle level players who would get beaten by a high level player with only a center ball stroke. However, some of those middle level players are a little higher up in the middle level with T.O.I than they would be with only a center ball stroke.
 
Last edited:
Hi Tim,

Perhaps 'advanced' may not have been the most precise & totally accurate word to use. But for lack of a better one, that I could not think of, I would think that 'advanced' describes both playing with english & TOI, given the numbers to numbers comparison who actually play with either method as their main shot vs just using a bit of english or TOI here & there for an occasional shot..

Do I think that either one is really that difficult that only an 'advanced' player could use them? Certainly not. That was not I how meant it at all.

However, I was not referring to anyone shooting an occasional shot here or there with a bit of english or TOI. I was referring to playing with it as the basic method & means of playing such as CJ does & I did with english for so long.

What would you call 'advanced' technique or method? I'm not sure I want to know if using TOI or english as a base method is not on the advanced side.

When doing a numbers to numbers comparison I think you would find that most do not use either one as their base shot. I see your point that one can be more accomplished & experienced & hence a more 'advanced' player than someone that has just started using TOI or engllish as base method. That is applying the word 'advanced' to two different nouns. A technique or method & then to a player.

This communication in a text format only, certainly seems to be an advanced method of communication to me at times, or perhaps it is actually a regression from plain old in person talking to one another.

I thinks your regression at times when using TOI before you knew want it actually was may have been due to your not really understanding the underlying principles & hence perhaps not knowing how to make any adjustments.

I think playing with a different cue a few weeks ago may have been the reason that I started looking at the cue ball during the stroke. I think it was because that the TOI was not working as well due to the different squirt deflection. Normally I can adjust to such things rather quickly but I would guess that on that day I did not. So I started looking at the CB to make sure that I was not putting TOO much inside on the ball.

Anyway that's gone & I'm glad.

So...what word, level wise, would you put on TOI or english as a method of play & not just for a shot here & a shot there?

Regards & Best Wishes,
Rick
 
Last edited:
Hi Tim,

Perhaps 'advanced' may not have been the most precise & totally accurate word to use. But for lack of a better one, that I could not think of, I would think that 'advanced' describes both playing with english & TOI, given the numbers to numbers comparison who actually play with either method as their main shot vs just using a bit of english or TOI here & there for an occasional shot..

Do I think that either one is really that difficult that only an 'advanced' player could use them? Certainly not. That was not I how meant it at all.

However, I was not referring to anyone shooting an occasional shot here or there with a bit of english or TOI. I was referring to playing with it as the basic method & means of playing such as CJ does & I did with english for so long.

What would you call 'advanced' technique or method? I'm not sure I want to know if using TOI or english as a base method is not on the advanced side.

When doing a numbers to numbers comparison I think you would find that most do not use either one as their base shot. I see your point that one can be more accomplished & experienced & hence a more 'advanced' player than someone that has just started using TOI or engllish as base method. That is applying the word 'advanced' to two different nouns. A technique or method & then to a player.

This communication in a text format only, certainly seems to be an advanced method of communication to me at times, or perhaps it is actually a regression from plain old in person talking to one another.

I thinks your regression at times when using TOI before you knew want it actually was may have been due to your not really understanding the underlying principles & hence perhaps not knowing how to make any adjustments.

I think playing with a different cue a few weeks ago may have been the reason that I started looking at the cue ball during the stroke. I think it was because that the TOI was not working as well due to the different squirt deflection. Normally I can adjust to such things rather quickly but I would guess that on that day I did not. So I started looking at the CB to make sure that I was not putting TOO much inside on the ball.

Anyway that's gone & I'm glad.

So...what word, level wise, would you put on TOI or english as a method of play & not just for a shot here & a shot there?

Regards & Best Wishes,
Rick
Rick,
First of all; in the second paragraph, second line, last word: I originally said "corner." before I edited it. I meant to say "diamond." That originally couldn't have made any sense. When I started doing T.O.I 17 years ago I would put a small amount of deflection on the cue ball and when I would cut to the left I would aim so if it was a center ball hit it would hit on the short rail about 2 inches from the corner point.

When I saw the video I started aiming for the direct center of the ball as instructed. I've been doing that for awhile and been frankly, fascinated with it. Lately, I've been moving the cue tip closer and closer to the center and I'm realizing that this is now advanced T.O.I. and realized I started doing things this way in the beginning without learning the fundamentals. So this could definitely have been cause for my
lapses. After doing it for seventeen years, It didn't take me long to learn the fundamentals.

However, although there are some posters who are completely closed minded to T.O.I, (I think you know their names) there are some posters who say they can't get it. They sound like intermediate players. There are other intermediate players who embrace it. The thing is; there are some posters who sound like they are advanced and who don't sound hostile to T.O.I., but who are politely skeptical. I think ,maybe they've tried it and can't get it. I might be wrong, It's just my perception.

When I would lose my perception of T.O. I. I would feel some what like a baseball pitcher who loses the perception , not of how to make the ball break, but how to make the ball break right as it approaches the plate. The ball would break way to soon, or the ball would still be going straight as it approaches the plate.

You can't excel with T.O.I. unless you're real good with the center ball hit. I don't think anyone excels with a center ball hit. I might be wrong. So what I'm saying is that while I was a player who, at one time, was just alright with center ball, T.O.I allowed me to play better than I could with center ball. At that stage I still was no where near as good with T.O.I as those who had no T.O.I but a real good center ball hit. As I said, I might be wrong, but I think it's possible some players with a real good center ball hit, just can't perceive T.O.I.

Anyhow, I don't want to take up Fran's thread talking about another instructors schtick. I just saw your name here. I haven't read much of Fran but from what I've read on this thread It reads like she's an instructor who is very open minded about new ideas herself and if you like to read her, I'll take that as a recommendation and I'm looking forward to reading more from her in the future.
 
Last edited:
Rick,
I don't understand anyone being hostile to T.O.I. seeing how the guy who preaches it is on You Tube firing in shots very effectively with it. I do, however, understand how some posters can't do it. Draw a straight line from the first diamond on either side of a short rail to the first diamond on the other short rail. Place the object ball on this line halfway between a short rail and the side pocket. Place the cue ball on the same line, same place, on the other side of the table.

For 17 years, before I watched the DVD, I would aim about 2 inches from the corner point on the short rail and deflect the ball in. (I didn't know I was deflecting it but that's another story!) It was only after I watched the DVD that I started aiming straight for the middle of the ball towards the diamond and deflecting it in. These days I'm going back and forth and can't decide where I want to settle.

So I guess I've been doing T.O.I for 17 years. The point is; there have been many, many times during those 17 years where I'd completely lost perception of how to do T.O.I. I'd do it well on Monday, and Tuesday I'd be clueless. I'd get down on the ball and say to myself. "I simply don't know what to do. I've lost the perception I had just last night. I don't know where to push off from."

I'd then go back to center ball and sometimes it would take me 2 weeks to get my perception of T.OI. back. Fortunately, this doesn't happen anymore. When I say I've practiced pocketing balls for 10,000 hours, I'm fully aware ther might be some posters who have done double, or even triple that. I stiil think I'm safe in saying I've practiced more than the vast majority of posters.

This pocketing pool balls business is an awfully difficult process. While T.O.I has obviously been proven highly effective for those who can execute it properly, and while it would be entirely improper for those who can't execute it to be jealous of those who can, my own experiences teach me that it's perfectly understandable that some posters might not have any perception of how to execute it whatsoever. That being said, I don't believe T.O.I is necessarily an advanced technique. I believe some of those who are able to pick it up are middle level players who would get beaten by a high level player with only a center ball stroke. However, some of those middle level players are a little higher up in the middle level with T.O.I than they would be with only a center ball stroke.

Elroy, I have never seen a poster who is hostile to true T.O.I. What I have seen, and am probably the main proponent of, is hostility to totally inaccurate claims about it. TOI has been around as long as there have been leather tips and chalk. It is nothing new, nothing "kept secret that only a few know about". There isn't a decent player out there that does not know how to use it, and when to, and when not to use it.

The problems arise with the false claims about it made for marketing purposes. There isn't a player out there above B level that uses it on every shot. Despite the claims by one on here that he does on 80% of his shots. (even though it has been proven that he doesn't)

Since you and others obviously have not picked up on it, no one plays with only center axis shots. Now and then some do in practice, and have ran racks that way. Every decent player uses some english on some shots. They use it when required, and only when required. The better the player, as a general rule, the closer they stay to center ball, and the more they can do with just a little english. Where the lower player would need more english to do the same thing.

The better players tend to stay closer to middle ball because it reduces variables. I suggest you watch Buddy Hall some time. He seldom will go more than one tip away from center ball.

As far as CJ's videos of using the technique, they are highly edited. In case you don't know, he doesn't play anywhere near the level he used to play. It's called "marketing". Take a known thing, build it up, make it your own, make it some "secret", and make some money selling it to the lower ranked players. Only problem I have with it is all the false statements made in the process. Worse part is that many of those statements he actually thought were true. Some he has finally changed his stance on after finally learning some of the real truth about the physics of ball reaction that can't be changed.
 
Fran,
I'll write Neil back in a p.m. The last thing I want to do is turn your thread into another T.O.I. debate. I was just responding to Rick's post about his perception that advanced or alternative (my word) ideas were not being considered or embraced to the extent they should be. I used T.O.I as a reference point because that is the one such idea that I am most familiar with. I think some of the points I made could probably be applied to other advanced or alternative ideas....sorry if I diverted things a bit.
 
Fran,
I'll write Neil back in a p.m. The last thing I want to do is turn your thread into another T.O.I. debate. I was just responding to Rick's post about his perception that advanced or alternative (my word) ideas were not being considered or embraced to the extent they should be. I used T.O.I as a reference point because that is the one such idea that I am most familiar with. I think some of the points I made could probably be applied to other advanced or alternative ideas....sorry if I diverted things a bit.

Thanks for your thoughtfulness.
 
I have a question:

How important is it to bend 100% from the hip? I feel sometimes that my back hurts after a long session so I assume that I'm using too much my waist.
 
I have a question:

How important is it to bend 100% from the hip? I feel sometimes that my back hurts after a long session so I assume that I'm using too much my waist.

It depends.Your back might be hurting you because you may be standing off-balance. It may not be due to bending at the hip.

Can you post a link to a video of you shooting?
 
Back
Top