Folks:
Are my eyes deceiving me, or is Gerry banned and this is his last post?
Obviously, the above post didn't have anything to do with it. But I can't believe that he was banned because of the uproar over banning SJD -- when it was SJD who attacked, not Gerry. I stuck up for Gerry in this post:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?p=4610368#post4610368
Because he was able to post a day or so after the SJD incident, it's obvious he wasn't banned then, so I'm wondering why he's banned now? Was a thread or post removed that I didn't see?
:scratchhead:
-Sean
<-- Gerry supporter
I hate to say it but it appears that Gerry's ONE tongue-in-cheek comment about SJD groping his daughter is the only thing that I can see that would be even close to grounds for banning.
Perhaps it is an attempt to pacify the already banned and stave off further threats.
You see, this is the reason that the "back and forth" as SJD calls it, is NO GOOD. The retorts go on ad nauseam UNTIL one person hits another person's HOT BUTTON. Then all hell breaks loose.
THIS IS WHY THE PERSONAL ad hominem ATTACKS SHOULD NOT BE TOLERATED IN THIS FORUM.
I saw another poster who I won't name in another unrelated thread making disgusting remarks about another poster. While I was going to call out the well known poster for his disgusting remarks, I realized that he doesn't really care whose feelings he hurts or who reads his posts. These two posters think it is all fun and games but eventually one of them will get pissed off and I wouldn't be surprised to see unsavory things happen, regardless of surface reconciliation.
I try to control what I say on forums because it's the right thing to do but I also wonder about the ramifications if I really got hot at someone. I haven't been really angry in a long time. I don't really consider myself a vicious guy, but I wouldn't like to see me getting furious at anyone, especially over some one-upsmanship, childish crap on the forum.
Everyone has their limits.
I guess Gerry found a weakness in SJD's seemingly impervious veneer. But one ad hominem attack should have merited a warning, not a banning but this isn't my forum.
ON another note, you know, apologies are fine and dandy but on a forum, most of the time, they are just words, designed to tidy up the place and aren't genuinely sincere. So the apologies often are just ways of sweeping the dirt under the rug. We've seen repeated behavior that warrants multiple bans so some people can't change. SJD is most likely a really nice guy. I think the forums allow some of us to say things that are better left unsaid.
Maybe we can all learn from this.
JoeyA