It's CYCLOP, not Cyclops!!!!!!

[Hungarian]

Dang, who is that? She's smoking hot!!!

_____________________________________________________

 

[Black-Balled]

I have traditional balls and I play with them a lot.

I think them balls are just fine, they do play heavier than the aramith pros, but I always thought aramiths felt hollow anyway.

 

[sunburn]

I haven't seen a Cyclop ball yet....
....but I'm keeping an eye out for them.

Hilarious! :grin-square: :grin-square: :thumbup:

 

[Cornerman]

Dang, who is that? She's smoking hot!!!

That's the Chicagoplayer! And she's Raisin' the Hustler!

Freddie <~~~ thinks she's definitely hot

 

[btown]

played with cyclop balls last night first time

So after reading all these threads and post about cyclop balls i went to league last night and they had a set on the big table.

At first they didn't seem to different then i started to notice the differnces.

1. They do not get the backspin of the rail like normal balls.
If you are back-cutting a ball with spin of a rail you are going to come up way shorter then normal. Seems as soon as they hit the rail they lose all spin.

2. The cue-ball seems somewhat see-thru.
The logo is under the surface of the GLAZE.
I think these balls should be called glazed donut balls

3. I rolled the q ball down and noticed a wobble

4. Please keep these balls in china

These balls suck!

 

[purpdrag]

And they also think that the opposite of "win" is "loose".

I think that's a "mute" point. Yes. The point is "mute".

 

[pt109]

I think that's a "mute" point. Yes. The point is "mute".

If you say so

 

[Cornerman]

If you say so

I didn't hear a thing.