CTE Pro One makes no sense to me...

ENGLISH! said:
And you think that fosters cooperation?

Please point out where I laid out any word trap?

I know many of you are suffering from former, abuse, from non system advocates but you gotta get over it & take each communication on their own

& not lump them all into one as you do with 5 or more shots from the same supposedly objective visual.

Now...see what you've done.

Just FYI, I was basically done & had gotten my clarification. But now you've changed the subject.
Click to expand...

Your reputation proceeds you. Your MO in these discussions are all about word entrapment's.
The subject is the same, you don't know what you don't know.
 
ENGLISH! said:
You contradict yourself from earlier when you said that it does not take getting used to it.

How then can experience make it easier?
Click to expand...

See word games. Where did i say that " it does not take getting used to it."

Experience makes just about everything easier.
 
ENGLISH! said:
Hi Gary,

I don't know if this will help you or not, but it is my understanding that it is suppose to take the need for the shot looking right or wrong out of the picture.

One does not even need to see the pocket.

I've made my own conclusions as to what CTE is & what it is not.

You may have to do the same & then proceed accordingly. It seems to me that you yourself might be fighting with it.

It's been said by some that one needs to just let go & trust it.

Good Luck & Best 2 You,
Rick
Click to expand...

Early on in the process some shots may not look right, you should shoot them anyway and check your results. Gary is doing this and finding out that on some shots different visuals take you to different pockets, but you wouldn't understand this. Gary does because he is actually shooting the shots.
 
cookie man said:
Your reputation proceeds you. Your MO in these discussions are all about word entrapment's.
The subject is the same, you don't know what you don't know.
Click to expand...

I know what you either don't know or won't admit if you do.

I know that 'CTE' is not a totally objective aiming method.

Does that mean that one should not pursue using it if they so choose?

No. One should do whatever one wishes to do for themselves.

Having all the facts from which to make a decision is always a good thing, IMO.

The 'promise' of a totally objective system can certainly raise expectations.

Also the actual facts help to balance one's expectations at times.

I think the recent character of this thread was fine with a few simple questions & a few satisfactory answers.

A normal civil conversation, that is, until you jumped in with your hostile 'attacking' unecessary defensive & commanding tone & nature.

Now look where you've taken it.
 
Last edited:
ENGLISH! said:
I know what you either don't know or won't admit if you do.

I know that 'CTE' is not a totally objective aiming method.

Does that mean that one should not pursue using it if they so choose?

No. One should do whatever one wishes to do for themselves.

Having all the facts from which to make a decision is always a good thing, IMO.

Also the actual facts help to balance one's expectations at times.
Click to expand...

How can you know if you've never seen the video or taken any actual lessons from a reputable instructor?
Why are you so stuck on these words anyway, "totally objective aiming method" ?
Where exactly did they come from, who said them and when?
 
ENGLISH! said:
I know what you either don't know or won't admit if you do.

I know that 'CTE' is not a totally objective aiming method.

Does that mean that one should not pursue using it if they so choose?

No. One should do whatever one wishes to do for themselves.

Having all the facts from which to make a decision is always a good thing, IMO.

Also the actual facts help to balance one's expectations at times.
Click to expand...

The actual facts are Gary is watching the video and performing the shots with success,
 
ENGLISH! said:
Yes & that's fine, but he inferred that he was having a bit of trouble with whether or not they looked right.

So what's your point here?
Click to expand...

You wanted facts, I gave them to you.
What's the point of you being in a cte conversation when you have no desire to use or learn it?
 
cookie man said:
How can you know if you've never seen the video or taken any actual lessons from a reputable instructor?
Why are you so stuck on these words anyway, "totally objective aiming method" ?
Where exactly did they come from, who said them and when?
Click to expand...

So, are you admitting here that Stan's CTE is not a totally objective system?

That certainly seems to be the implication from your post.
 
Last edited:
ENGLISH! said:
I know what you either don't know or won't admit if you do.

I know that 'CTE' is not a totally objective aiming method.

Does that mean that one should not pursue using it if they so choose?

No. One should do whatever one wishes to do for themselves.

Having all the facts from which to make a decision is always a good thing, IMO.

The 'promise' of a totally objective system can certainly raise expectations.

Also the actual facts help to balance one's expectations at times.

I think the recent character of this thread was fine with a few simple questions & a few satisfactory answers.

A normal civil conversation, that is, until you jumped in with your hostile 'attacking' unecessary defensive & commanding tone & nature.

Now look where you've taken it.
Click to expand...

I see you've done some editing.
Your answers were clearly of the "baiting" kind.
 
ENGLISH! said:
So, are you admitting here that Stan's CTE is not a totally objective system?

That certainly seems to be the implication from your post.
Click to expand...

Not admitting anything until you provide info on who and when the "totally objective system" was mentioned. See i know how u twist things so if you could kindly provide that information I would be more than happy to give you my feelings and interpretation on it.
 
cookie man said:
Not admitting anything until you provide info on who and when the "totally objective system" was mentioned. See i know how u twist things so if you could kindly provide that information I would be more than happy to give you my feelings and interpretation on it.
Click to expand...

That should not be necessary at all.

You either:

conclude that it is,

conclude that it is not,

or have made no conclusion.

It seems rather odd to me that so much of the 'defense' by Stan, & those like you has been against when others have said that it is not a totally objective system & now the stance seems to be, who said that it is.

Okay, if I & others have concluded that it is not a totally objective system & no one has said that it is such then it would seem reasonable to conclude that

Stan's CTE Pro1 is not a totally objective aiming system.

Would that be reasonable with you?
 
Last edited:
cookie man said:
I see you've done some editing.
Your answers were clearly of the "baiting" kind.
Click to expand...

I have no idea to what questions & answer of which you are referring here.

I asked you to point out any trapping that you say I did before this 'conversation' between us began, but so far no such response.

Go back & look at the recent posts of this thread with an unbiased & objective eye & open mind that most lurking readers have & I think you will see a different picture than the one you have predisposed in you head.
 
I'm done with your nonsense.

Your trolling posts worked.

You're going back on ignore.
 
Last edited:
Never mind.

All was quiet on this front until someone spilled their milk & cookies.
 
Last edited:
oldmanatc said:
Thanks rick. Sometimes finding where to stand to see both CTE and edge to a/b/c isnt so obvious. Ill look and easily see either or but have to move around until i see both.
Click to expand...

Oldmanatc,

You might want to go onto YouTube & search for Stan's Videos on perception. There are 2 of them. One with 3 sets of large balls & one with 5 normal sized balls of 5 parallel shots.

Those videos should either help you along or give you reason for pause.

Good Luck & Best Wishes,
Rick

Is Your handle a reference to 'The Old Man & the Sea'? That is a very good story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top