And if you can't strike one ball perfectly, make sure it's not the cue ball.If you can strike one ball perfectly, make it the cue ball.
And if you can't strike one ball perfectly, make sure it's not the cue ball.If you can strike one ball perfectly, make it the cue ball.
Exactly!You "go by feel" no matter what you subscribe to. Systems can make it seem like there's no feel involved (and that can help your confidence), but it isn't really true.
pj
chgo
I'm sure you'll be passing on royalties to Phil, Stan, Hal and all the antecedents to your great discovery.i learned pro one cte system from phil burford (england) and been on it about 3 yrs now. i took it to another level and it's so simple i'm in awe of what i discovered. need to nail it down as mine and how to market it but just incredible find. eddiethelock.com splains it a little and don't know when i will release info. but gonna
The conventional terminology when describing "Aiming System" is as defined on a piece of paper.. with aiming points and parallel lines and such.. I have seen them. These only work on a very small percentage of shots and can be easily broken by varying a couple things..
For a quick example, if you change the speed from soft to very hard on a slight cut shot with outside, the contact point that the CB needs to contact the OB to make the ball in the pocket varies by a couple mm, however, the "aiming point" varies by as much as 2-3".. How can that be???
What have I done!
I didn't know better I swear!![]()
Sorry, but if you really think most people repeatedly hit the cb where they intend to hit, you are very wrong. Not to mention that most aiming systems are for center ball hits. If you use english, you have to compensate for that some way and that can throw the aim line off also.
I've been reading/watching a lot of information since I started playing pool. I watched videos, I bought DVDs, I read books and they almost always mention aiming systems.
I tried most of them, maybe I didn't spend enough time using them, but I can't seem to end up liking them more than going by feel. Going by feel seems to work just fine for me and I can only guess it will get even better with time, while I feel aiming systems are a bit unnatural and takes from your concentration.
What do you guys do? Aiming systems or feel? A bit of both?
....and this is EXACTLY why aiming systems don't work..
If you have to adjust then you are adjusting arbitrarily..and therefore, your system is just as good as pointing at the OB and saying hit it here, somewhere...
"Aiming systems are good for Center ball hits" - does not account for incidental english, at different speeds. (who uses center ball anyways.. not most people)
"Most people don't hit where they intend to.." - means people inadvertently apply english.. (refer to next statement) So you have to always adjust.. again, but don't even realize it - poor "system"
"If you use english..." - lol... really? Exactly. ..and this is when you want to apply english intentionally, you have to arbitrarily adjust, based on distance, angle, cloth, speed (and don't forget to make that adjustment for accidentally hitting it where you did not intend to)
So glad to get that cleared up..
The truth of the matter is people start making more balls when they try some concocted aiming system because they are actually paying attention to shooting instead of whacking the ball.. They normally spend longer shooting in order to "get used to" the new system and this basically translates into more table time... Aiming advocates take out all the middle stuff and just say "Aiming system=make more balls" where this is not the case.. Spending more time at the table focused will make more balls.. Not being lackadaisical will help you make more balls... Making a better bridge and staying down and following through - will help you make more balls.. and finally, spending more time shooting will help you make more balls..
I have taught dozens of "pro's" aiming systems.
You don't teach them how to aim, you teach them a system to recognize all shots with.
Pro's are easy, rookies a little tougher.
randyg
Exactly!
Take the most perfect system possible, the straight in shot, with perfect points of reference, cue actually points to all contact points and yet, with OB 3 feet from the pocket and the CB 5 feet away, the shot troubles even pro players.
Everyone must feel they are aligned to where the CB needs to be hit. Or use feel or some system to make adjustments for non-linear alignment (such as undercutting, then swiping or turning a ball in with outside) or for dealing with squirt, swerve and throw.
I use feel and experience to get an aim line and 95% use pivoting (BHE) type system to adjust for the other variables.
imho, the best way to learn to feel when you're on the aim line, is to hit a lot of firm pots along the center axis of the CB, then use knowledge of throw etc to build upon that perception.
Colin
....and this is EXACTLY why aiming systems don't work..
If you have to adjust then you are adjusting arbitrarily..and therefore, your system is just as good as pointing at the OB and saying hit it here, somewhere...
"Aiming systems are good for Center ball hits" - does not account for incidental english, at different speeds. (who uses center ball anyways.. not most people)
"Most people don't hit where they intend to.." - means people inadvertently apply english.. (refer to next statement) So you have to always adjust.. again, but don't even realize it - poor "system"
"If you use english..." - lol... really? Exactly. ..and this is when you want to apply english intentionally, you have to arbitrarily adjust, based on distance, angle, cloth, speed (and don't forget to make that adjustment for accidentally hitting it where you did not intend to)
So glad to get that cleared up..
The truth of the matter is people start making more balls when they try some concocted aiming system because they are actually paying attention to shooting instead of whacking the ball.. They normally spend longer shooting in order to "get used to" the new system and this basically translates into more table time... Aiming advocates take out all the middle stuff and just say "Aiming system=make more balls" where this is not the case.. Spending more time at the table focused will make more balls.. Not being lackadaisical will help you make more balls... Making a better bridge and staying down and following through - will help you make more balls.. and finally, spending more time shooting will help you make more balls..
IMO Aiming systems can "get you in the ball park" but the rest is your brain calculating. The truth of the matter is that if any one system was perfect, no one would miss much. Sure you can argue and say their stroke or pre shot routine was off but a lot of people have great technique and still miss. If one system worked we'd have only have to work on cue control![]()
I use the ferrule..
The truth is that most people are searching for magic bullets to improve their game and aiming systems aren't that. They are methods that must be trained in order to understand the perception and to trust the lines given.
It's impossible for any objective method or system to do that. The player does that with the assistance of whatever method or system.The good methods do much more than get you in the ball park. They line you up EXACTLY on the shot line.