Regarding John Schmidt being convinced by a friend that "it works".

I dont NPR so I had to go take a look at the nekked girls. (Purely in the interests of this discussion.) Having found the thread in question and hitting a few pages at random I'd have to say someone has gone off the deep end. Dozens and dozens of shots, one after the other. I was flabbergasted.

Who does that?

It's somewhere between Ted Kaczyninski and Jack Nicholson in "The Shining." It's disturbing and kinda creepy.

Lou Figueroa
 
lfigueroa said:
I dont NPR so I had to go take a look at the nekked girls. (Purely in the interests of this discussion.) Having found the thread in question and hitting a few pages at random I'd have to say someone has gone off the deep end. Dozens and dozens of shots, one after the other. I was flabbergasted.

Who does that?

It's somewhere between Ted Kaczyninski and Jack Nicholson in "The Shining." It's disturbing and kinda creepy.

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...

Lou,

You're doing the same thing that 'they' do.

Mis-characterizing.

There are no "nekked girls" there.

I explained that the number of posts there are a direct relation to when being bored here with the best topic for reading & discussing is "what color chalk do you use".

If I wanted to just look at such pics, I would not have to sign onto AZB to do so.

The ONLY that I look at such pics is when on AZB & waiting for something of interest to pop up.

One thread there started by Sev has 229,374 views in 3 years.

I think rather many go there for some "eye candy" when bored & waiting for something of interest to come up elsewhere.

Instead of going to view, I add new content for them.
 
Last edited:
DTL said:
.....and that was just ONE thread. There are 3 or 4 different threads with the same.
Click to expand...

There are way more than 3 or 4 threads with the same now "non" CTE stuff in this sub forum.

Now you want to limit a type of topic to what? One(1) thread!

Once an individual member opens a thread, another, individual member can not open their own thread.

It seems that you should get your site so that you can run it how YOU want it run.
 
DTL said:
Typical MO......implying someone said something they didn't.

That is positively the POT calling the Kettle black, but it does NOT surprise me at all.

I just simply stated that there are more than one girly-pic threads in the NPR.....which is OK. Carry on.

"girly-pic"? ? ?

You show how you think & perhaps another reason why you are on this crusade.
Click to expand...

No..

I'm merely doing what so many others do to make the point...

& to also show that text only is not the best form of communication & that when someone "wants' to make a statement that is "suggestive" of something in particular that there can be an instance that others may find a different "suggestion" than what was intended to be "suggested".

If one does not want to say things outright, but wants to imply things, etc. then it becomes necessary for others to critique what is being implied & to show exactly what is going on.
 
ENGLISH! said:
Lou,

You're doing the same thing that 'they' do.

Mis-characterizing.

There are no "nekked girls" there.

I explained that the number of posts there are a direct relation to when being bored here with the best topic for reading & discussing is "what color chalk do you use".

If I wanted to just look at such pics, I would not have to sign onto AZB to do so.

The ONLY that I look at such pics is when on AZB & waiting for something of interest to pop up.

One thread there started by Sev has 229,374 views in 3 years.

I think rather many go there for some "eye candy" when bored & waiting for something of interest to come up elsewhere.

Instead of going to view, I add new content for them.
Click to expand...


lol. I'm not going to play any of the games you use -- with great success I might add -- with others here. Been here too long and I know what you're doing better than you do. I will not parse words with you. I could care less what your motivation is. I don't care how many posts/views you generate.

I suggest you seek professional help.

Lou Figueroa
 
lfigueroa said:
lol. I'm not going to play any of the games you use -- with great success I might add -- with others here. Been here too long and I know what you're doing better than you do. I will not parse words with you. I could care less what your motivation is. I don't care how many posts/views you generate.

I suggest you seek professional help.

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...

Thanks for the laugh, Lou.

The ONLY "professional help" that I may need is a physical Doctor since I am 62 with some health issues & eventually an undertaker.

I've been very faithfully & happily married for coming on 35 years & with no fantasies involving pics of any women & not even my Wife.

I wonder if Hugh Hefner has ever had to seek any "professional help" given that he was responsible for all of the taking of the pictures of all of those live unclothed women, the production, printing, any distribution of countless of magazines of more countless pictures of countless unclothed women?

Have you ever looked through a Playboy Magazine, Lou?
 
Last edited:
ENGLISH! said:
Thanks for the laugh, Lou.

The ONLY "professional help" that I may need is a physical Doctor since I am 62 with some health issues & eventually an undertaker.

I've been very faithfully & happily married for coming on 35 years & with no fantasies involving pics of any women & not even my Wife.

I wonder if Hugh Hefner has ever had to seek any "professional help" given that he was responsible for all of the taking of the pictures of all of those live unclothed women, the production, printing, any distribution of countless of magazines of more countless pictures of countless unclothed women?

Have you ever look through a Playboy Magazine, Lou?
Click to expand...


I don't care what your physical condition is. I don't care how old you are. I don't care what your marital status is. And I certainly don't care about HH and PB.

My recommendation stands.

Lou Figueroa
 
lfigueroa said:
I don't care what your physical condition is. I don't care how old you are. I don't care what your marital status is. And I certainly don't care about HH and PB.

My recommendation stands.

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...

I've just been advised by Mr. Wilson that if a I ask a question & one either answers or does not answer that I should just either accept their answer or non answer & just walk away.

So, I will just say thanks for the glimpse into your heart & mind & I would make the same recommendation to you.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
 
Last edited:
Take some time out of your busy schedule, and friend John on Facebook and ask him yourself.

I seem to remember the pendulum stroke thread too, I remember the experiment done, and cad drawings showed that the cue moved in a straight line through the ball.

You did not want to believe it because there was a variance that was a fraction of the diameter of a human hair. To which Neil told you that you were down to measuring the lice on fleas.

You railed on the man who made the stroke model, and he put you in your place rather well.

Hero worship, hardly.

Do you need another lesson?

ENGLISH! said:
Yeah, Right. You just want to continue to seek the selective censorship that you want.

What John Schmidt said was brought HERE for a purpose...
& it can be discussed HERE regarding that purpose.

Threads that have been "locked" can still be read. RandyG made no supportive explanation because the inaccurate statement that he made can not legitimately be supported by any rational logical explanation...
Just as the inaccurate description regarding CTE can NOT be supported by a rational logical explanation.

As to the mud... like Jean Lafitte's 2nd. in command, Dominique You, said in the movie The Buccaneer, "There's something in the wind, Pike."
News may be forth coming & it may not be good news.

Hero worship is rarely a good thing.

To many here, he & Scott Lee are one eyed jacks because many only see the working money making side of them. Well, I've seen the other side of their face in private exchanges.
Click to expand...
 
Tony_in_MD said:
Take some time out of your busy schedule, and friend John on Facebook and ask him yourself.

I seem to remember the pendulum stroke thread too, I remember the experiment done, and cad drawings showed that the cue moved in a straight line through the ball.

You did not want to believe it because there was a variance that was a fraction of the diameter of a human hair. To which Neil told you that you were down to measuring the lice on fleas.

You railed on the man who made the stroke model, and he put you in your place rather well.

Hero worship, hardly.

Do you need another lesson?
Click to expand...

John Schmidt did not make the post here.

Another made the post here for a motive.

The CAD showed that the tip 'never' traveled in a straight line & if I remember correctly the tip was nearly a 1/4 inch lower by the time that it got to the the location of the middle of where the ball sat or perhaps it was the front. That is an indication that it is arcing downward & NOT moving straight through the ball. That may be conducive for tip hits below center but not for tip hits above center. An individual posted not too long ago how he was having rather much trouble when hitting high on the ball with his full pendulum stroke. There is very very much going on during the time of contact & it is being shown that it may be as long as 4 thousandths of second or longer which is double or more than what was previously thought.

Science is the on going continual study & observation.

Dr. Dave made quite a few changes & additions to his site recently simply because of the discussions in a recent thread by Lamas.

The other plywood model had issues & I "railed" on no one & no one "put" me in my place.

Straight is straight & any curve is NOT straight.

Yes, hero worship. Keep a nose to the wind.

You've taught no lesson.

A good 'teacher' knows that they can not teach anyone anything. They can only give them reason to think.

You've given me nothing new that would give me cause or reason to think any differently.
 
Last edited:
ENGLISH! said:
I've just been advised by Mr. Wilson that if a I ask a question & one either answers or does not answer that I should just either accept their answer or non answer & just walk away.
Click to expand...


In that case...

CTE is objective.


Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
 
Take Lou's advice, and get help.


ENGLISH! said:
John Schmidt did not make the post here.

Another made the post here for a motive.

The CAD showed that the tip 'never' traveled in a straight line & if I remember correctly the tip was nearly a 1/4 inch lower by the time that it got to the the location of the middle of where the ball sat. That is an indication that it is arcing downward & NOT move straight through the ball. That may be conducive for tip hits below center but not for tip hits above center. There is very very much going on during the time of contact & s being shown that it may be as long as 4 thousandths of second which is double what was previously thought.

Science is the on going continual study & observations.

Dr. Dave made rather many changes & additions to his site simply because of the discussions in a recent thread by Lamas.

An individual posted not too long ago how he was having rather much trouble when hitting high on the ball with his full pendulum stroke.

The other plywood model had issues & I "railed" on no one & no one put me in my place.

Straight is straight & any curve is NOT straight.

Yes, hero worship. Keep an nose to the wind.
Click to expand...
 
Tony_in_MD said:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=4323701&postcount=75
:)
Click to expand...

Ahhh,

Did you not see the "nearly straight"?

I am fairly sure that I was one that brought that up.

Did you not also consider that that was a computer.

How many human beings do you think can duplicate the perfection of a computer.

Also that was one particular set up of bridge length, bridge height, & a non real 'hand' placement with a single pivot point.

Why do you want to bring all this up in a thread about "it works"

Distraction away from the issue at hand?

I suggest that you start another thread if you want to revisit this issue. We can then go there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top