Regarding John Schmidt being convinced by a friend that "it works".

BeiberLvr said:
Irrelevant.

It's an answer.

Don't like or agree with it? Tough! Good bye.
Click to expand...

No that too is inaccurate, as I placed no specific question to you.

So, you are not answering a question that I asked of you.

You made a statement & I commented on your statement.

If you think Mr. Wilson's direction to me applies only to me I think you are mistaken.
 
DTL said:
The same ones that can accelerate exactly at the moment of tip contact. :rolleyes: Oh, and the ones that can hit near center ball and then swipe across the CB at tip contact. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I think you are misstating & misrepresenting both of those matters.

CJ very often said things in a non literal manner. Some understood that & hence understood what it was that he meant. If it was shown that he misspoke or had said something incorrectly he would clarify & say it differently to basically convey what he meant.

And no one that I know of ever said the swipe of the tip initiates after hitting the ball but that the swipe of the ball can not happen until the tip contacts the ball.

one may be swiping air slightly before contact but the goal & intention is to swipe across the ball significantly & if one starts with the tip already on the side of the ball then there is little ball swipe & mostly air swipe after contact.

Those are entirely different than the impression that you are attempting to give.
 
ENGLISH! said:
No that too is inaccurate, as I placed no specific question to you.

So, you are not answering a question that I asked of you.

You made a statement & I commented on your statement.

If you think Mr. Wilson's direction to me applies only to me I think you are mistaken.
Click to expand...

Whatever you say dumb dumb.
 
DTL,

No quoting of me or communicating with me or insulting me or implying totally untrue disgusting & immoral things about me...

please.
 
lfigueroa said:
I dont NPR so I had to go take a look at the nekked girls. (Purely in the interests of this discussion.) Having found the thread in question and hitting a few pages at random I'd have to say someone has gone off the deep end. Dozens and dozens of shots, one after the other. I was flabbergasted.

Who does that?

It's somewhere between Ted Kaczyninski and Jack Nicholson in "The Shining." It's disturbing and kinda creepy.

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...

I don't NPR, either, but I had to take a look. Now I get it.

Awhile back Duke linked to a pic of a little girl that Rick posted over there, all dolled up like a two-bit whore. That was enough for me to become filled with revulsion toward him. I tried to find it again to show my wife the kind of guy we were dealing with, but I couldn't find it. I assumed that he took it down as per a demand from the site owners.

Now, after discovering there are over 100 pages of porn photos in just one thread, I see how seriously twisted and sick his mind must be. Just some pics of "beautiful women" my ass. There's more silicone in that one thread than has been used by Intel since the first microprocessor was developed.

Yes, who does that? I am shaking my head in disbelief. Yeah, there's some "fine art" and "glamour" photography thrown in there, but there's also plenty of what can only be considered to be porn. The most frightening part is, I don't think he can even tell the difference. In fact, he still seems to defend the little girl pic. What else lurks inside that diseased mind of his I haven't a clue, but I'm sure glad I don't have to touch his keyboard or mouse after a long session of perusing porn sites for all this garbage.:eek:
 
Sloppy Pockets said:
I don't NPR, either, but I had to take a look. Now I get it.

Awhile back Duke linked to a pic of a little girl that Rick posted over there, all dolled up like a two-bit whore. That was enough for me to become filled with revulsion toward him. I tried to find it again to show my wife the kind of guy we were dealing with, but I couldn't find it. I assumed that he took it down as per a demand from the site owners.

Now, after discovering there are over 100 pages of porn photos in just one thread, I see how seriously twisted and sick his mind must be. Just some pics of "beautiful women" my ass. There's more silicone in that one thread than has been used by Intel since the first microprocessor was developed.

Yes, who does that? I am shaking my head in disbelief. Yeah, there's some "fine art" and "glamour" photography thrown in there, but there's also plenty of what can only be considered to be porn. The most frightening part is, I don't think he can even tell the difference. In fact, he still seems to defend the little girl pic. What else lurks inside that diseased mind of his I haven't a clue, but I'm sure glad I don't have to touch his keyboard or mouse after a long session of perusing porn sites for all this garbage.:eek:
Click to expand...

How could I have forgotton to put YOU on ignore? But, I'm actually glad that I had not done it yet.

The picture of the little girl was a cute little toddler posted in the Portraits of Beaty thread. I also posted about her being a TRUE Beauty with a smile like an Angel or something like that.

IMO, I think only those with an evil perverted heart & mind could & would twist it to be the digusting crap that you & another have.

The picture was one like those that any portrait studio or Kmart or JC Penny would take for parents or grandparents.

Like another said, God is watching & it is certainly NOT me that He has concerns about.
 
The Law Blog unabashedly loves Fred Shapiro, the Yale Law School librarian and the author of the indispensable “The Yale Book of Quotations.” In a column in the Yale alumni magazine earlier this year, he listed some of the most famous quotations by Yale alumni. Among them was the characterization of pornography by Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart (pictured): “I know it when I see it” (Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964).

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/09/27/the-origins-of-justice-stewarts-i-know-it-when-i-see-it/


ENGLISH! said:
How could I have forgotton to put YOU on ignore? But, I'm actually glad that I had not done it yet.

The picture of the little girl was a cute little toddler posted in the Portraits of Beaty thread. I also posted about her being a TRUE Beauty with a smile like an Angel or something like that.

IMO, I think only those with an evil perverted heart & mind could & would twist it to be the digusting crap that you & another have.

The picture was one like those that any portrait studio or Kmart or JC Penny would take for parents or grandparents.

Like another said, God is watching & it is certainly NOT me that He has concerns about.
Click to expand...
 
Here is the Post & Picture & what I actually did say that is being portrayed as pornographic.
It is post #936 on page 63 of the Portraits of Beauty Thread in NPR for those that want to check the edit date & see that no recent 'doctoring' has been done. If anyone sees that as pornographic in any way... well let's just say that they are NOT a normal human being... & perhaps NOT a human being at all.



ENGLISH! said:
And then there is True Beauty... on the outside...

& on the Inside... Where the Heart Resides.

d24cea78763bab5970e8c7611918ea0d.jpg
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top