Stevie Moore parallel shots CTE video

[nine_ball6970]

Real CTE is based on the fact that just 3-6 foundational visual alignments exists for pocketing balls on a 2x1 table. There is literally a zillion possible CB OB positionings.
A student can be taught the visuals but it is the student that must learn to recognize the correct alignments. It will not happen in a short time and it won't happen without dedicated effort.
Besides that, students must learn cue angling direction whether inside or outside.
It would take an ignoramus that proclaims to know CTE and assert that learning CTE is possible in a short time and without supreme focused. John clearly stated that he did neither of the two.
The effort for learning to know CB OB CTE relationships and proper pivot directions is too much work for some. CTE is not an overnight deal. Think in terms of months or longer. But the effort is worth it......Many players spend years and up to a lifetime and never learn to properly align as Lou recently stated about his battle of inconsistent alignments.
I can teach alignments but I can't do the job of sorting out the few alignments that must be mastered by immediate recognition during competition.....not my job. It is very doable though for any serious player that wants to learn how to really align.

Stan Shuffett

I am sorry but this post makes zero sense.

An example would be the infamous 5 shots made with same visual perception and sweep. Are you saying that shots in between those in the video would require a different visual/sweep?

Edge to A inside should cover all shots within a certain range. If a person understands that then why would they miss balls that require that perception and pivot?

You say that any shot can be made on a table using the 3-6 visual alignments stated above. That covers all of the zillions of shots. People have said figuring out the sweep is the easy part because you can tell whether it needs to be thicker or thinner.
Above you make it sound like that is not true and the student must put in many more hours than John did.

You keep claiming that CTE is so easy to learn and everyone who doesn't get it is stupid. Your above post makes it sound extremely complicated.

 

[stan shuffett]

Why in the world would he do that if yours is superior, if it's all it's cracked up to be?

Your biggest most consistent beef with anyone who has seen your DVDs -- and not been able to make the system work -- is that they did not come to the material with an open heart and mind. If John's heart and mind were not open to learning your system, then who?

This is nothing but a bunch of world class crawfishing. You can disavow it all you want. You can now try and distance yourself from his performance and all he said after spending 15 hours with you but you will never be able to untangle yourself from this Tar-Baby.

Lou Figueroa

Yiou are spinning which is mostly what you always do. I think the readers can see through you like glass.

Stan Shuffett

 

[stan shuffett]

I am sorry but this post makes zero sense.

An example would be the infamous 5 shots made with same visual perception and sweep. Are you saying that shots in between those in the video would require a different visual/sweep?

Edge to A inside should cover all shots within a certain range. If a person understands that then why would they miss balls that require that perception and pivot?

You say that any shot can be made on a table using the 3-6 visual alignments stated above. That covers all of the zillions of shots. People have said figuring out the sweep is the easy part because you can tell whether it needs to be thicker or thinner.
Above you make it sound like that is not true and the student must put in many more hours than John did.

You keep claiming that CTE is so easy to learn and everyone who doesn't get it is stupid. Your above post makes it sound extremely complicated.

I tell it like it is. Pool is arguably at the top of all tough sporting pursuits. CTE is an organized objective way for approaching the game. CTE is muti-layered and professional in every way. DVD1 represents the system but there are errors. DVD2 represents some system refinements and its connection to 2x1 tables.
My work did not stop at DVD2. It has continued for years and the totality of what I have learned that Hal most certainly knew is book worthy.
Time will vindicate me.....Haters and knockers like you one day will be laughed at in a big way. Count on it....it already happening to some degree but my job is not quite yet done.

Stan Shuffett

 

[nine_ball6970]

I tell it like it is. Pool is arguably at the top of all tough sporting pursuits. CTE is an organized objective way for approaching the game. CTE is muti-layered and professional in every way. DVD1 represents the system but there are errors. DVD2 represents some system refinements and its connection to 2x1 tables.
My work did not stop at DVD2. It has continued for years and the totality of what I have learned that Hal most certainly knew is book worthy.
Time will vindicate me.....Haters and knickers like you one day will be laughed at in a big way. Count on it....it already happening to some degree but my job is not quite yet done.

Stan Shuffett

I wish you would have answered some of the questions I asked instead of blowing them off and insulting me.

I am part of the frustrated group of people who have owned both DVDs and could not get the system to work. You can call me a hater or knocker or whatever you want if that makes you feel better. The fact remains that I spent around $100 on two DVDs. I put time in on the table and sought out help on the forums. I gave it an honest effort and came away with the fact that I couldn't get it to work for a variety of shots.

I really wish I could have gotten it to work but I could not. Saying that I just didn't put enough time in is insulting.

Maybe the key is somewhere in the book but I am not willing to spend even more money when I had believed that everything needed was contained in DVD2 after you said there were errors in the first DVD.

 

[stan shuffett]

Cte is not complicated!

CTE is different and odd at first which means that AIMING occurs from an offset vision center. Many students simply can't let go of having to aim directly down the cue with their vision center.
Over the past couple of years I have learned a lot more about proper offsetting. I can explain it better now than I could 6 or even 3 years ago.

My work has been very challenging because I have had to work from the perspective of trying to grasp what Hal Houle knew but would not clearly spell out....It has taken me years of looking at balls and hitting another million balls again to finally access Hal's visual knowledge.

I am sorry to all that wanted perfection from me to begin with. I have tirelessly worked to share the entirety of something very special.

If the folks here want me to take to my grave what I have finally come to know, please vote me off the island now and I will also shut my book project down as well....no clinics and no YouTube videos. Just shore a bunch that wants me gone......and see what I do.

Stan Shuffett

 

[stan shuffett]

I wish you would have answered some of the questions I asked instead of blowing them off and insulting me.

I am part of the frustrated group of people who have owned both DVDs and could not get the system to work. You can call me a hater or knocker or whatever you want if that makes you feel better. The fact remains that I spent around $100 on two DVDs. I put time in on the table and sought out help on the forums. I gave it an honest effort and came away with the fact that I couldn't get it to work for a variety of shots.

I really wish I could have gotten it to work but I could not. Saying that I just didn't put enough time in is insulting.

Maybe the key is somewhere in the book but I am not willing to spend even more money when I had believed that everything needed was contained in DVD2 after you said there were errors in the first DVD.

Sorry, I am frustrated too. I am tired of all the hate. I understand that I have failed you. And that I have failed others for not being perfect........but I have not failed myself because I have never quit......I will be offering free clinics and many online videos to close any gaps to what I think now is the perfection that I have sought after for EVERYONE. One thing for sure is that I am not selfish. I have worked for Hal and everyone that truly wants the real info that he knew.

I know how unpopular that I am now. I deal with it and go on working for everyone so that they can this very special historical information.

Stan Shuffett

 

[nine_ball6970]

CTE is different and odd at first which means that AIMING occurs from an offset vision center. Many students simply can't let go of having to aim directly down the cue with their vision center.
Over the past couple of years I have learned a lot more about proper offsetting. I can explain it better now than I could 6 or even 3 years ago.

My work has been very challenging because I have had to work from the perspective of trying to grasp what Hal Houle knew but would not clearly spell out....It has taken me years of looking at balls and hitting another million balls again to finally access Hal's visual knowledge.

I am sorry to all that wanted perfection from me to begin with. I have tirelessly worked to share the entirety of something very special.

If the folks here want me to take to my grave what I have finally come to know, please vote me off the island now and I will also shut my book project down as well....no clinics and no YouTube videos. Just shore a bunch that wants me gone......and see what I do.

Stan Shuffett

I will quit posting in this thread. My last comment is that some people expect the information to be perfect when spending $55 on a DVD called The Final Chapter.

 

[stan shuffett]

I will quit posting in this thread. My last comment is that some people expect the information to be perfect when spending $55 on a DVD called The Final Chapter.

Landon has won 7 national championships with DVD2 info only.......I did not stop there and honestly after 1000s of more hours of work at my table I gained a lot of additional depth into what was happening with CTE and vision....

It was a mistake to name that video the final chapter. I had the system in DVD1 and its tie to the table in DVD2. At that time I had zero clue that I would discover Hal's visual secret. Perhaps, I should have never said a word about additional knowledge and just take the info to my grave.

I am to the point that I do not care whether my work is appreciated or not. I know that I am disliked by many and that my work is considered as a failure to many. But I never failed myself becsuse I do not quit. I kept going and I will soon share all of my new knowledge in the spirit of Hal at no charge....clinic and YouTube video. That will satisfy some but not all.

Stan Shuffett

 

[cookie man]

Forgot one

Visualize, align, pivot, pray, miss:thumbup:

Would rather pivot and Pray then poke and hope

 

[cookie man]

Lmao @ everything is a "system" Listen closely - IT'S THE ONLY WAY TO MAKE A BALL!!! There is no system to it.

You guys aren't inventing anything. Seriously 38 frickin chapters?

There's not a single one of you that can explain it, and not a one of you can show it.

Keep runnin your trap - it's hilarious
Jason

I can show it. You live in florida?

 

[Neil]

Landon has won 7 national championships with DVD2 info only.......I did not stop there and honestly after 1000s of more hours of work at my table I gained a lot of additional depth into what was happening with CTE and vision....

It was a mistake to name that video the final chapter. I had the system in DVD1 and its tie to the table in DVD2. At that time I had zero clue that I would discover Hal's visual secret. Perhaps, I should have never said a word about additional knowledge and just take the info to my grave.

I am to the point that I do not care whether my work is appreciated or not. I know that I am disliked by many and that my work is considered as a failure to many. But I never failed myself becsuse I do not quit. I kept going and I will soon share all of my new knowledge in the spirit of Hal at no charge....clinic and YouTube video. That will satisfy some but not all.

Stan Shuffett

Stan, don't let a few get you down. There are many, many, more that really appreciate all you have done for pool.

 

[Neil]

I will quit posting in this thread. My last comment is that some people expect the information to be perfect when spending $55 on a DVD called The Final Chapter.

And yet, so many have learned it just from DVD 1. My questions to you would be: Did you go through each of the shots on the table as the DVD instructed? Did you take the shots you had trouble with and try and determine what it was you were doing wrong on them? Just what is it that you are missing that others did not miss?

 

[stan shuffett]

Stan, don't let a few get you down. There are many, many, more that really appreciate all you have done for pool.

Thanks, Neil!
I appreciate your thoughts.
It's is tough going at times. I know that my heart is in the right place and that my work is for the right reason.

There are many many people that want me to fail. It may be a generation thing in that a generation or two may have to pass before CTE is looked at more seriously. I understand because CTE is a phenomena.....and therein lies the problem.
Many don't want it, real or not.

Stan Shuffett

 

[Dan White]

I don't know, but the most unfortunate thing about this thread is that I can't stop thinking of the work "squadouche." I didn't even know that was a bona-fide word. Thanks a lot, Lou!

 

[mohrt]

I have not played 9ball in years and years. Even nowadays -- when I have played one of perhaps half a dozen sets of 9ball -- I spot my opponent a break and jump cue because I don't carry those.

And frankly 1pocket demands considerably more precision that 9ball. Not only are you often shooting shots that require 18-25' of accuracy, you must be able to precisely play the CB and OB to any point on the table. Just because the ball isn't going into a pocket doesn't mean you don't have a target.

Lastly, it always amuses me how people see my match with JB through different prisms. All I can tell you is that those that really know 1pocket do not share your view.

Lou Figueroa

So you haven't played 9-ball in years. How many years of One Pocket do you think John has under the belt? I'd say little to none. He did take lessons and got pointers prior to your match, and he did make good moves. There were also several mistakes he clearly made, taking too big of a risk only to hand the table over to you with an easy starting shot. That in itself was the make-or-break with the match. If there was a seasoned One Pocket player telling John the moves to make, you would have been in quite a lot of trouble. You would have had zero edge. You won this match because of your knowledge of One Pocket, not because of shot making abilities. The CTE argument has little to do with One Pocket moves, which is what this match turned out to be an exhibition of.

 

[Neil]

Thanks, Neil!
I appreciate your thoughts.
It's is tough going at times. I know that my heart is in the right place and that my work is for the right reason.

There are many many people that want me to fail. It may be a generation thing in that a generation or two may have to pass before CTE is looked at more seriously. I understand because CTE is a phenomena.....and therein lies the problem.
Many don't want it, real or not.

Stan Shuffett

Part of it is probably because so many today want instant gratification. They don't want to or aren't capable of looking ahead and building a road to get to where they want to go. Rather than work hard to obtain something they want, they just say they don't have what it takes to get there and never even really try to get there. They give up too easy.

 

[mohrt]

So Dan White, you have watched some of the hundreds of hours of youtube videos Stan has put online, yes? Are you basically saying that he does not use the system as he describes it, he is actually falling back on a feeling to make these shots in the videos? In many cases he is clearly stating Edge-to-A, pivot to center, etc, etc. You say no one can explain it or demonstrate it, yet the vidoes show bank after bank, ball after ball, pocket after pocket. If he is not pocketing these balls as he is describing, how else is it happening? Video editing? Luck? Black Magic? HAMB feel it in?

All I'm saying is, there is plenty of evidence that the system works. Saying it is all a bunch of hogwash in the name of making a buck on a DVD is just indescribably infuriating to those of us that know better. I do agree there are MANY players having difficulty learning it, and I wish it were easier to grasp for all walks of life. Maybe that day will come as the language around the system gets better.

 

[stan shuffett]

Part of it is probably because so many today want instant gratification. They don't want to or aren't capable of looking ahead and building a road to get to where they want to go. Rather than work hard to obtain something they want, they just say they don't have what it takes to get there and never even really try to get there. They give up too easy.

Very well stated and I think quite true.

I know for sure that pool can be reduced to just a few foundational alignments that are as familar as a straight-in shot. It takes a little work to learn the alignments because they occur from an offset. Plus those few alignments must be recognized as they arise from a zillion possibilities.
CTE is dead simple once properly learned. Players spend lifetimes and never master alignment but with real CTE, mastery of alignment be understood and applied in relatively short order.
Most do not believe it! Hal chose to not totally explain CTE for the reasons of which he warned me about.
I have weathered the worst of the storm and brighter CTE days are ahead.

Stan Shuffett

 

[stan shuffett]

So Dan White, you have watched some of the hundreds of hours of youtube videos Stan has put online, yes? Are you basically saying that he does not use the system as he describes it, he is actually falling back on a feeling to make these shots in the videos? In many cases he is clearly stating Edge-to-A, pivot to center, etc, etc. You say no one can explain it or demonstrate it, yet the vidoes show bank after bank, ball after ball, pocket after pocket. If he is not pocketing these balls as he is describing, how else is it happening? Video editing? Luck? Black Magic? HAMB feel it in?

All I'm saying is, there is plenty of evidence that the system works. Saying it is all a bunch of hogwash in the name of making a buck on a DVD is just indescribably infuriating to those of us that know better. I do agree there are MANY players having difficulty learning it, and I wish it were easier to grasp for all walks of life. Maybe that day will come as the language around the system gets better.

CTE will become easier. It has always worked. Hal would instruct students to do this and that and they'd make a few balls with no clue of what occurred.

What I essentiallly did was launch into a journey of going into another man's mind for a seeing a never supposed to be perfection that existed for AIMING two spheres on a 2x1. My problem was how would I know that I made contact with the phenomena that Hal had come to know. After 1000s upon 1000s of hours of looking at CB OB relations every which way possible I finally hit upon the unmistakable piece that put it all together. I am going share it and won't be hampered by knockers and haters.

Stan Shuffett

 

[Bluechipone]

Stan,

I have been to your house for instructions on Pro One and have bought your DVD's.

Your information has improved by game immensely. I am very grateful for your time and energy to provide us with this knowledge. I am looking forward to your book. I am going to try to find the time to attend one of your clinics. Thanks again.