Difference In A $100 Cue And A $10,000 Cue

But You said.....
Originally Posted by MitchAlsup:
"You can replace the $100 bass guitar 100 times before it costs you as much as the $10K one at the start."

He did, and he's still correct. $100 x 100 = $10K. He never said you can only play with a $100 cue. Maybe he wanted a prettier wood? Prettier woods don't cost more because they hit better, they cost more because they are not common and the law of supply and demand is in full force. But, if his cue lasted 10 years, it would take a few lifetimes to reach the $10k figure, no ?
 
He did, and he's still correct. $100 x 100 = $10K. He never said you can only play with a $100 cue. Maybe he wanted a prettier wood? Prettier woods don't cost more because they hit better, they cost more because they are not common and the law of supply and demand is in full force. But, if his cue lasted 10 years, it would take a few lifetimes to reach the $10k figure, no ?

The comparison is...$100 product vs. $10,000 product.
The Bass Guitar Video Guy said... no difference.
So I see that you agree with premise that they are equal, except for the pretty wood.
"Prettier cues don't cost more because they hit better."

If this was true you could buy a Wal-mart cue anytime you need a replacement. If the cue lasted 2 years, it would take a few lifetimes to reach the $10K figure, no?

$400 is too much for most people to pay for a cue.
So a question was posed......
What brand/model of cue has the highest quality to cost ratio.
Keeping the cost under.....$100?, under $200?
 
Back
Top