Does it get better because I watched 15 minutes of mediocre pool.
He missed that 2 ball by 1 1/2 diamonds. He was never where he planned to be.
Ran into balls he didn't intend to.
And slow. 15 minutes and he was still muddling thru the 3rd rack:sorry:
Does it get better because I watched 15 minutes of mediocre pool.
He missed that 2 ball by 1 1/2 diamonds. He was never where he planned to be.
Ran into balls he didn't intend to.
And slow. 15 minutes and he was still muddling thru the 3rd rack:sorry:
The match starts at 44mins mark
Do you read? I watched 3 racks. So obviously I went to the 44 minute mark
3 racks run mediocre ok now i understand you
It doesn’t have fast paced action and possible fisticuffs like hockey. And most importantly an amateur player needs to spend a few years putting in mad practice before they become good enough to really play.
Pool just can not thrive in he modern world. It can hold on as it has been doing but that is all it will ever do, and that has absolutely nothing to do with winner break. I’d like to see you run a 9 piece of anything on anything...maybe that 4 ball challenge thing like at the carnivals
You'd like to see it, as if you doubt it? Well, doubt all you want, it happened, and thats not the point of my reply. If we all took your doom and gloom point of view and simply accepted that pool isnt good enough to be hugely popular, and not make changes, then it wont be. Maybe you should not limit the game as you've limited your belief in others, and no doubt your own self.
You know the consecutive break-and-run is not lost with alternating breaks. There are consecutive birdies in golf and consecutive strikes in bowling as there are also consecutive completed passes in football and consecutive hits by a player in a baseball game. Rennie Stennett hit 7 consecutive at bats for the Pirates in 1975 while a lot happened in between each bat. Opponents compete while "consecutives" happen. It is a good thing. Dennis Hatch had 9 consecutive break-and-runs (Alternate Break) in our pro event in May. 2019 Spring Tri-State Invitational
I'm not convinced that 9 ball is harder than 8 ball on a bar box. I feel like I run out at 9 ball far more often than 8 ball on a 7 footer. On a 9 footer it seems like it's just the opposite. Probably just me though.I'm no pro but even I've done 9 straight tables of 9-ball on a 7 footer, which is harder than 8-ball.
I’d like to see you playing before I’d believe it possible, a 3 or 4 piece could be a B Player’s outlier maybe but a 9 doesn’t happen randomly. And I’m not saying pool isn’t good enough for TV im saying the modern world is not good enough for pool, it’s too difficult for average people to do well so they see it as just a random thing to occasionally suck at.
I'm not convinced that 9 ball is harder than 8 ball on a bar box. I feel like I run out at 9 ball far more often than 8 ball on a 7 footer. On a 9 footer it seems like it's just the opposite. Probably just me though.
I'm not convinced that 9 ball is harder than 8 ball on a bar box. I feel like I run out at 9 ball far more often than 8 ball on a 7 footer. On a 9 footer it seems like it's just the opposite. Probably just me though.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
9 ball bar box is most certainly,by far
much easier
Agreed, I've only played 15 ball rotation as a ring game.no question about it. 8 ball on a barbox is far more difficult than 9 ball on a barbox. 15 rotation is another story.