Having watched golf over the years, I heard about Big Bertha and it's effect off the tee.
I remember as a young man, picking up Steve Mizerak's cue stick/Balabuska and was amazed it was, 21-22oz. Too me that was a Heavy cue, much more than most of his peers used.
Now there are cue sticks in the 60-65'' range, unheard of in the Lassiter/Crane/Balsis/Mosconi era.
Then there are the Snooker pros, using very similar cue lengths and weights and always using the same ball sets.
Is it because of the Measles ball for TV....that the pros need the larger/longer/heavier/and LD shafts? Or is it the cloth? the rails? or the cushions of today???
I'm going to interview allot of em at the Open this yr. and find out. My guess....the TV cue ball....and I could be wrong.
Those that want to bash this thread, take it some where else. I'm just trying to get to the reason, why Big Bertha is now on our door step.
Like .....Why do players have sooooooooooooo much shaft sticking out from their bridge hand, when Mosconi and his era it was not effective?
I remember as a young man, picking up Steve Mizerak's cue stick/Balabuska and was amazed it was, 21-22oz. Too me that was a Heavy cue, much more than most of his peers used.
Now there are cue sticks in the 60-65'' range, unheard of in the Lassiter/Crane/Balsis/Mosconi era.
Then there are the Snooker pros, using very similar cue lengths and weights and always using the same ball sets.
Is it because of the Measles ball for TV....that the pros need the larger/longer/heavier/and LD shafts? Or is it the cloth? the rails? or the cushions of today???
I'm going to interview allot of em at the Open this yr. and find out. My guess....the TV cue ball....and I could be wrong.
Those that want to bash this thread, take it some where else. I'm just trying to get to the reason, why Big Bertha is now on our door step.
Like .....Why do players have sooooooooooooo much shaft sticking out from their bridge hand, when Mosconi and his era it was not effective?