*THE REAL* Pool's 15 most influential people/brands list

The only player most could name is Minnesota Fats.

Equipment?
Master Chalk because it’s on the rail.

Eastpoint...cues sold at Walmart likely known more than the rest together.

How have like guys Earl have been ‘influential’. In what way? Pro players may be known among the 1% of pool players who actually play pool. However, even among that 1% I don’t know anyone who looks to Earl as some model to emulate. I was in the military and learned to swear without Strickland’s tutelage.

Anyways. 99% Pool players pick up a cue and need to read the brand name to remember it. They hit balls on a table...and then go home and watch the Football or Hockey game.

Guys like Florian ‘Venom’ may be entertaining but they have no influence on the Sport. No more than folks watching Lions in Africa on TV then start teaching their pet cat how to hunt.

Pool is a great game, fun. However Thr average guy playing the game could be transported back in time 40 years to a table and not notice. AZ Billards is likely ‘the’ American Pool forum on the Web. It has less postings a day that forums about pet hedgehogs or needlepoint. Hint...almost nobody other than those on this forum are influenced by anything pool related. Nobody cares but a few dozen reinforced by groupthink.

I play with about 150 players.

The only player most could name is Minnesota Fats.

Equipment?
Master Chalk because it’s on the rail.

Eastpoint...cues sold at Walmart likely known more than the rest together.

How have like guys Earl have been ‘influential’. In what way? Pro players may be known among the 1% of pool players who actually play pool. However, even among that 1% I don’t know anyone who looks to Earl as some model to emulate. I was in the military and learned to swear without Strickland’s tutelage.

Anyways. 99% Pool players pick up a cue and need to read the brand name to remember it. They hit balls on a table...and then go home and watch the Football or Hockey game.

Guys like Florian ‘Venom’ may be entertaining but they have no influence on the Sport. No more than folks watching Lions in Africa on TV then start teaching their pet cat how to hunt.

Pool is a great game, fun. However Thr average guy playing the game could be transported back in time 40 years to a table and not notice. AZ Billards is likely ‘the’ American Pool forum on the Web. It has less postings a day that forums about pet hedgehogs or needlepoint. Hint...almost nobody other than those on this forum are influenced by anything pool related. Nobody cares but a few dozen reinforced by groupthink.
There's only one player I wanted to play like growing up and that's Earl.

Everybody liked Efren when he came over but we still wanted to hit the ball like Earl.

Earl still draws a huge crowd today, nobody else is even close.

I guess you don't like Earl but you still know who he is
 
Stu;

In addition to the 4 world 9b championships and the 5 US Open 9b titles I would say, yes, there is even more to his influence on the game. His negative influence is undeniable yet it causes stands to be filled for his matches unlike pretty much any other player we know. Negative, I know, but it still influences people to watch even if some are just waiting to see a train wreck.

Added to that are some positive influences, as well, like how when all of a sudden Earl started playing with a javelin length cue and now look at all of the players who are using longer than standard cues and extensions like our very own Captain America, SVB. Earl's influence is responsible for this and some of his other choices like, for instance, using various weights, glasses, finger slides, tennis racket and friction tape wraps, these things have also been duplicated by many players.

Though certainly not on par with Willie or Jeanette, Earl has done some great exhibition shows trying to give a little back to pool. I feel that Earl has had real influence on pool and is perhaps the most controversial person ever to play our sport.

He certainly keeps us talking. That's influence, too! 🙂

I'd sooner jump from a window (a low one) and land on my head rather than have Charlie Williams replace Earl on my most influential list. o_O 🤯🤪

best,
brian kc
Strongly disagree. All top players give exhibitions, but Willie and Jeanette probably gave five to ten times as many as most and drew people to the game with their great elegance and charisma. They drew people to the game that didn't even play it or barely played it. Quite a few of their exhibitions were done for charities and for corporations, and few of those exhibitions were done in a poolroom.

Earl's primary influence has been on those that are already serious players or fans, and, in my opinion, his influence hasn't attracted many to the game, nor has it figured in growing pool more than marginally. Earl's influence on equipment has been relatively minor, and very few have followed his lead in using newfangled equipment. Being controversial doesn't qualify one as influential. Keeping us talking isn't influence, either. Nobody questions that he is a legendary player with a magnificent resume of titles, but that alone doesn't make him influential.

Whatever you think of Charlie Williams, whom I said wouldn't make my top 15, he's had way more influence on the game over the years than Earl, and more than all but a few players of the last twenty five years. He has been a true innovator and a mover and shaker in pool for a long time. Obviously , you don't like him and prefer not to give him his due, and that's your right, but his accomplishments stand on their own, and he has had a profound influence on the game over the years, helping to grow it on many occasions through his entrepreneurship.
 
Guys like Florian ‘Venom’ may be entertaining but they have no influence on the Sport. No more than folks watching Lions in Africa on TV then start teaching their pet cat how to hunt.

Actually he would have more influence on the sport than anyone. He has more social media followers and online views than any pool league, pool tour, or pool player combined by far. He has been in the main stream where players of today have not. What we do may not be every pool players cup of tea but the general public loves it and that is the crowd we want to get into.
 
Strongly disagree. All top players give exhibitions, but Willie and Jeanette probably gave five to ten times as many as most and drew people to the game with their great elegance and charisma. They drew people to the game that didn't even play it or barely played it. Quite a few of their exhibitions were done for charities and for corporations, and few of those exhibitions were done in a poolroom.

Earl's primary influence has been on those that are already serious players or fans, and, in my opinion, his influence hasn't attracted many to the game, nor has it figured in growing pool more than marginally. Earl's influence on equipment has been relatively minor, and very few have followed his lead in using newfangled equipment. Being controversial doesn't qualify one as influential. Keeping us talking isn't influence, either. Nobody questions that he is a legendary player with a magnificent resume of titles, but that alone doesn't make him influential.

Whatever you think of Charlie Williams, whom I said wouldn't make my top 15, he's had way more influence on the game over the years than Earl, and more than all but a few players of the last twenty five years. He has been a true innovator and a mover and shaker in pool for a long time. Obviously , you don't like him and prefer not to give him his due, and that's your right, but his accomplishments stand on their own, and he has had a profound influence on the game over the years, helping to grow it on many occasions through his entrepreneurship.
Stu;

I respect your opinion, as always, but we'll have to agree to disagree on this.

I think at least in part it's to do with our our interpretations of "influential" and your understandable partiality to the positive side of influence. I believe Earl has had both a positive as well as a negative influence on pool.

best,
brian kc
 
I don't understand. At least I understood what the other list tried to represent, which was influence at present in our sport. Yes, it was the worst poll I've ever seen in our sport, and highlighted the cluelessness of its voters, but at least it was clear what it meant to be.

Is this new poll for current influence or historical influence?

One thing is for sure. The most influential figure in the history of the sport is, by a mile, Brunswick, which once had a virtual stranglehold on the sport.

The most influential figure in the sport today is Matchroom.
...and the most influential in the future ...Josh Filler
 
This is a very interesting thread in that it clarifies and narrows the initial request. With that said, it was actually the movie 'The Hustler' that had to most influence on pool. More pool halls opened, and the new ones were clean and invited ladies. More folks looked for a place to play pool because of 'The Hustler' than any other influence.
 
This is a very interesting thread in that it clarifies and narrows the initial request. With that said, it was actually the movie 'The Hustler' that had to most influence on pool. More pool halls opened, and the new ones were clean and invited ladies. More folks looked for a place to play pool because of 'The Hustler' than any other influence.
Whats the hustler?
 
One last thing I didn't mention that would support Earl's influence in pool is with him winning so many important championships, how many people looked at him as the guy they most wanted to play like. Not his bad behavior, I'm talking about his amazing skills at the table.

imo, Earl was the best shotmaker our sport has ever seen. The only one close is Jayson Shaw and I think he will have to continue for some years to come in order to displace Earl.

All, imo, of course.

best,
brian kc
 
One last thing I didn't mention that would support Earl's influence in pool is with him winning so many important championships, how many people looked at him as the guy they most wanted to play like. Not his bad behavior, I'm talking about his amazing skills at the table.

imo, Earl was the best shotmaker our sport has ever seen. The only one close is Jayson Shaw and I think he will have to continue for some years to come in order to displace Earl.

All, imo, of course.

best,
brian kc
Many consider Luther Lassiter to have been the best shotmaker ever in pool, but Earl's definitely in the conversation.

I'd call Jayson Shaw the third best shotmaker today. The best, by a hair, is Fedor Gorst and the second best is Josh Filler. They are, not surprisingly, the last two World 9-ball Champions.. Shaw is a small notch below both of them at shotmaking.
 
Imo it would be difficult to remove Earl from this top 15 I agree the DCC has had a big influence on our sport but do think it's under the umbrella of Greg Sullivan and Diamond could be wrong also what about the Johnson City Hustler's Jamboree?
Ok i have a question for clarity. Are we talking current or all time. It’s true that at one time Earl may have had a big influence but I don’t think he does today IMO of course. I guess I can also agree that DCC goes under the Sullivan umbrella. I am curious what some of the people on the list like Greg would say about the list? I will ask him next time I play him some 1 pocket at the club.
 
What about Johan Ruijsink? Not necessarily for his achievements as a coach of the Mosconi Cup. But more so for his achievements in grooming world champions. Maybe I’m giving him too much credit but I can’t help but wonder if the standard of play and the bar of excellence is significantly higher due to his influence on many of the top players.
 
Many consider Luther Lassiter to have been the best shotmaker ever in pool, but Earl's definitely in the conversation.

I'd call Jayson Shaw the third best shotmaker today. The best, by a hair, is Fedor Gorst and the second best is Josh Filler. They are, not surprisingly, the last two World 9-ball Champions.. Shaw is a small notch below both of them at shotmaking.
I was real close to including Filler on the best shotmaking list but figured he, like Jayson, need to keep it up for a while longer and Fedor, brilliant as he is, he's just getting started, relatively speaking.

As for Luther Lassiter, I admit to not knowing much about him and his shotmaking ability so I def should have qualified differently with Earl being the best shotmaker I've ever seen or knew of leaving the door open for someone like LL.

best,
brian kc
 
Ok i have a question for clarity. Are we talking current or all time. It’s true that at one time Earl may have had a big influence but I don’t think he does today IMO of course. I guess I can also agree that DCC goes under the Sullivan umbrella. I am curious what some of the people on the list like Greg would say about the list? I will ask him next time I play him some 1 pocket at the club.
for this thread I was considering all time most influential.
 
What about Johan Ruijsink? Not necessarily for his achievements as a coach of the Mosconi Cup. But more so for his achievements in grooming world champions. Maybe I’m giving him too much credit but I can’t help but wonder if the standard of play and the bar of excellence is significantly higher due to his influence on many of the top players.
OK, fill me in. Who, other than Fedor Gorst, has he groomed to become a world champion? Johan is also the mentor of Ruslan Chinakhov, a super straight shooter but probably never a world's top 25 professional in anything but straight pool. I also know that Johan did some great work with Skyler Woodward, helping Skyler get to the next level as a competitor, and that he did the same for Tyler Styer. Obviously, Johan is an amazing instructor, a legend in his field, but he hasn't, to my knowledge, groomed that many players that went on to become top professionals.

Johan may not even be among the ten most influential instructors of this era. Jerry Briesath has probably worked with twenty times as many players that went on to be top professionals over the years as Johan, but I wouldn't put Jerry in the category of most influential in pool either, despite the fact that he has served the game so very well over the years. I think the instructors that have been the most influential in pool are those that have mass taught the amateurs, especially those that have run the national organizations set up to teach the amateurs while also setting the national teaching curriculum. In America, that probably means Randy Goettlicher. I don't know who it would be in Europe or Asia.
 
Last edited:
I was real close to including Filler on the best shotmaking list but figured he, like Jayson, need to keep it up for a while longer and Fedor, brilliant as he is, he's just getting started, relatively speaking.

As for Luther Lassiter, I admit to not knowing much about him and his shotmaking ability so I def should have qualified differently with Earl being the best shotmaker I've ever seen or knew of leaving the door open for someone like LL.

best,
brian kc
Well said.

I think that's fair. These young players will have to prove they can sustain their marksmanship over a full career before we put put them in the conversation with guys like Strickland and Lassiter. Most consider Filler to be the straightest shooter today, but I really think Gorst shoots just a hair straighter. Shaw, as you note, has been a crazy-straight shooter over a longer period of time than either, and that does, as you suggest, mean something.
 
Who brought pool the Phillippines?
That's a very interesting question and I can only speculate here. It may have been Spain, as the Philippines had been ruled by Spain for centuries leading up to the Spanish American war in 1898. That said, it's more likely that pool was brought to the Philippines by the Americans, who ruled over the Philippines from 1898 until the end of World War II. Sounds like a question for America's greatest pool historian, Mike Shamos, but I don't think he posts here.
 
That's a very interesting question and I can only speculate here. It may have been Spain, as the Philippines had been ruled by Spain for centuries leading up to the Spanish American war in 1898. That said, it's more likely that pool was brought to the Philippines by the Americans, who ruled over the Philippines from 1898 until the end of World War II. Sounds like a question for America's greatest pool historian, Mike Shamos, but I don't think he posts here.
I read about Shamos in the Byrnes books.
Looks like I found a new hobby, billiard history.
 
Back
Top