10 year old boy gets 147 doing a drill which to some is not the same as practice. This wasn't done during an actual game.

For these very few players out there that are extremely skilled in both pool and snooker (certainly not me in either) my hunch is they’d tell you that what that 10 year old snooker player did is on par in terms of difficulty with a player running 150 in straight pool in a practice session.
They'd be wrong...

I played snooker for 10 years intensely and nearly exclusively from age 13 to 21. My best result in an actual game of snooker was 96 (down to the last red and colours spotted 🤬). Obviously I was not any level of snooker prodigy. I've been playing 14.1 for less than 1yr and have broken 125.

Granted I have been potting pool balls for a long time which has allowed me to progress in 14.1 at a rather decent pace. That said, 14.1 cluster management and developing break shots is child's play compared to developing a rack of reds while only having the black as alternating colour. We won't even bother discussing the slop 14.1 players get to enjoy on pool tables.
 
no lets do that, discuss the slop of 14.1 instead of trying to belittle what the kid has done

is 14.1 not called shot?
and does slop not count on reds of snooker or any color?
 
Yes, I have played snooker about twenty times. What makes a 147 break so rare is that the reds, which begin in a triangle formation, all need to be developed, and doing so without ever losing position onto the black is very difficult. The feat can be done in competition or in a practice match. Solo practice with a full triangle of reds can be done, but requires that safeties are played until there is an opening of some sort. This gives you practice in both safety play and in break building in a typical game situation.

The drill presented here is excellent practice, but it's a drill. The drill covers some, but not all, snooker break building skills, most notably omitting developing the reds. The nine ball ghost is also a drill. A ten pack against the ghost should not be confused with a ten pack and nobody having any integrity who runs a ten pack against the ghost would ever dare make the claim of having run a ten pack without qualifying that claim by saying that it was against the ghost.

Although one can score them if they choose and in any way they want, drills are not scored in the same way as ordinary racks of pool or frames of snooker and when one talks of a run in pool or a break in snooker, one is not referring to the completion or partial completion of a drill. That's what's false about the thread title. If I do a drill, I might record that I completed the drill successfully on two of my ten attempts, but I'm not going to count each ball made consecutively as if it were a run. That would misrepresent and overstate my accomplishment.

I have already said that this kid's accomplishment is extremely impressive, even calling it mind-blowing, and I said that he shows great promise, but the thread title misrepresents his accomplishment. He scored 147 in a drill, and did not score a 147 in practice, which means something completely different.
I have been told by a snooker obsessed
friend that keeps up with all this stuff that Ronnie and Judd both successfully accomplished this max 147 drill for the first time at age 12 or 13. That in itself puts some perspective on how impressive this was.
 
They'd be wrong...

I played snooker for 10 years intensely and nearly exclusively from age 13 to 21. My best result in an actual game of snooker was 96 (down to the last red and colours spotted 🤬). Obviously I was not any level of snooker prodigy. I've been playing 14.1 for less than 1yr and have broken 125.

Granted I have been potting pool balls for a long time which has allowed me to progress in 14.1 at a rather decent pace. That said, 14.1 cluster management and developing break shots is child's play compared to developing a rack of reds while only having the black as alternating colour. We won't even bother discussing the slop 14.1 players get to enjoy on pool tables.
So let me get this straight - you’re saying the successful completion of that snooker practice drill, scoring a max 147, on a 12-footer is far harder and more impressive than running 150 in straight pool? That was the point I was trying to make.
 
Last edited:
no lets do that, discuss the slop of 14.1 instead of trying to belittle what the kid has done
Who's been belittling anything...? Some just prefer to call a spade a spade. The kid is obviously impressive. There's no debate. Insinuating that he ran 147 in snooker is misleading.
 
This should give us all some hope for the cuing games' future.

2020 was a drag. This kid isn't.


Jeff Livingston
 
So let me get this straight - you’re saying the successful completion of that snooker practice drill, scoring a max 147, on a 12-footer is far harder and more impressive than running 150 in straight pool? That was the point I was trying to make.
My apologies Chris... I had it in my head for some reason that you meant an actual in game run of 147, and not the drill the kid did.

To clarify... I consider an in game 147 light years ahead of 150 in 14.1.

If I was to measure this 147 drill to a score in 14.1. I'd put it in the range of 100.
 
Semantics to suit your argument.

I did notice you dropped your Stef Curry comparison as soon as I pointed it out to be ridiculous... ;)

No. I just didn't feel like a back and forth on something I'm right about.
 
If anything that's more clickbait. As it's vagueness forces the reader to click in order to learn more.

"incredible shooting"?

Incredible shooting of what exactly?

My title

10 year old boy (fact)
gets 147 (fact)
in practice (fact)

What's in the OP

A video of a 10 year old boy getting a 147 in practice

That's not clickbait.
Dude, it was 100% clickbait. The key word in the whole title was "a" 147. "A" 147 means while playing the actual GAME OF SNOOKER. Period. End of story.

"A video of a 10-year old boy making XX number of consecutive balls in a snooker drill" would have been an accurate title and not clickbait.
 
After spending the last 35 years trying to be better, a little part of me just wants to punch that little sucker in the nose.

I'm kidding.


Jeff Livingston
 
Now that this thread has an appropriate/non-clickbait/honest title, I'll say:

Good for this kid! That's a good drill and he's doing a great job of executing the shots. I hope that he has a love for the game and that he goes as far as his passion and hard work can take him. And I acknowledge that at ten years old, I couldn't chalk a cue let alone run through this drill.
 
Now that this thread has an appropriate/non-clickbait/honest title, I'll say:

Good for this kid! That's a good drill and he's doing a great job of executing the shots. I hope that he has a love for the game and that he goes as far as his passion and hard work can take him. And I acknowledge that at ten years old, I couldn't chalk a cue let alone run through this drill.
Same here... Hopefully we'll see this young man at the Crucible some day and we can witness him perform an actual 147 ;)

Kidding aside... good on him. (y)
 
yeah. same is here in Finland.
Someone practices years and make 147 first time from drill - "no big deal. it was a drill everyone can do it"
then he makes 147 on practice game "no big deal - it was only practice game"
Then he make 147 on competition game. "no big deal- opponents are bad- and table too loose"
Then he makes on Star pro cut table on tourney "no big deal - it took 8 minutes- Ronnie makes them in 6"
and so on..
Better just not to care other people opinions.
 
Back
Top