Yeah, I like the player's history. I don't want to take that away.
Also regarding the table size, there has been so much controversy over the years that a small table is harder, or a big table is harder, that not recording the table size or ordering the list by table size one could argue is equally fair to both viewpoints. (or equally unfair).
When there are ties, I order them by date submitted first. (I just checked the first post in this thread and I forgot to write it there, but I wrote it in the rotation ghost thread). The logic there is two fold: 1) I don't have to keep as many stats. So no need to order a tie run by table difficulty. Second: it encourages people to play often and play early if they want their name higher on the list. I got this idea from Olympic Weightlifting competition. Ties used to go to the athlete with the lowest body mass. Now they go to the athlete who lifted the tie weight first.
Anyway for the time being I'm going to keep the list format the same way. I will investigate Bob's list idea. If that makes it easier, I may add some more stats.
Thanks for the suggestions.
