SVB to Kick Off High Run Attempts

Didn't SVB win the WC 14.1 title in 2019.... WiKi says yes.
Not wpa sanctioned. But Bobby corrected himself in that. No one thinks Shane isn't qualified to participate. Just that we are all clear that the criteria Bobby laid out was specifically said to exclude John Schmidt.

If they play big blocks then my money is on John. Willie mosconi won most of his titles in big block challenge matches iirc.
 
If you are referring to me maybe you should tune into our page and videos and also recent commentary. I've been wanting to put together an event for 20 years. It's OK as we figured there would be negative feedback with some people but it's OK as I've supported pool my whole life and never been selfish and only thought about myself like many others.
This is a great opportunity to help our dying sport so I would hope you and others would make more positive comments.
The sport isn't dying. Be truthful.
 
Nope that wasn't the context. And I imagine, as you certainly can, that John will be able to play after he recovers and as such would be not only competitive in the high run contest but would straight up drill Shane at it.

John, however, was not even invited as it clear that he is being snubbed. Maybe if he had been and was ready to play then your contest would have been over before it started based on the bar he might have set.

As it is though you can remedy that with an invitation now since your boss said this contest is open-ended and could go on for a decade.
Dude lost all credibility(as if he hadn't already) when he said Shane is the best straight pool player in America. What a joke

lol.

Lou Figueroa
 
And you're clearly planning on more, ten years or until Bobby gets bored.......

Sooooo, no need to criticize a fan just asking a pertinent question. We are two days in and the pr guy is already getting testy about being asked for basic information. Something that should have been ready to go in the many many many months of detailed planning and committee decisions surrounding this project.

You're a pro at this. Be better.

Testy?

Lou Figueroa
too funny
 
Words to live by.

On the Facebook page, it shows two videos for day 2.
  • DAY 2 - SVB - The Legends of Pocket Billiards 14.1 High Run Challenge, and the duration is 2:54:45
  • SVB Day 2 High Run Challenge and the duration is 6:13:09

I downloaded the second video and passed it through some analytic software I'm developing. Note that this software reads the video at 10x rate, so I wouldn't be surprised if some of the runs are off by a ball.

There were a few problems with the video itself, and i had to step through the software manually in one spot.

These are SVB's runs over the 6 hours and 13 minutes.
159​
42​
154​
115​
28​
30 (see note 1)​
103​
20​
17​
62​
0​
28​
42 (see note 2)​
84​
52​

Note 1
3.14 SVB starts new run, scoreboard is reset to show 0 racks​
3.16 SVB completes rack 1, but scoreboard shows 2. A minute later, scoreboard drops back to 1​
3.19 SVB completes rack 2, scoreboard increases to show 2​
3.20 Before SVB breaks again, scoreboard increases to show 3​
3.21 video freezes​
3.22 after the freeze, SVB is breaking and scoreboard shows 0. Assume that during the frozen (chopped?) part of the video that Shane scratched ending his run at 44 by the scoreboard, but 30 in real life.​

Note 2
4.46 SVB starts new run. Scoreboard shows 0​
4.49 SVB completes rack 1, scoreboard increases to 1​
4.52 SVB completes rack 2, scoreboard increases to 2​
4.53 Before SVB breaks again, the scoreboard increases to 3​
4.57 SVB completes rack 3, scoreboard increases to show 4​
4.58 SVB misses on the break. Scoreboard still shows 4, for a run of 56 by the scoreboard, but 42 in real life.​

I'll try the software out on other videos, but will first try different viewing speeds on this particular video. It's long enough to show some useful data.

Some of the other runs may have had scoreboard errors as well so it would be good to figure out the best viewing rate for catching those.

Although, maybe they aren't scoring errors. Maybe the rules for this event periodically allow the player to get "free racks for participation"?

Impressive.

Lou Figueroa
not kidding
 
Nope that wasn't the context. And I imagine, as you certainly can, that John will be able to play after he recovers and as such would be not only competitive in the high run contest but would straight up drill Shane at it.

John, however, was not even invited as it clear that he is being snubbed. Maybe if he had been and was ready to play then your contest would have been over before it started based on the bar he might have set.

As it is though you can remedy that with an invitation now since your boss said this contest is open-ended and could go on for a decade.

Maybe JS will recover his old form and maybe he won't.

Lou Figueroa
lol, sometimes
I crack myself up.
 
Hard to believe that it's up to the spectators to go thorough the videos to try and figure out what the runs are.

One would think they could have figured out a way to be accurate and clear.

As I said earlier on "All My Children" we are new at this, have made mistakes and will undoubtably make more.

BTW, if any of you numbers hounds want to pay to get a statistician to the event site, or just compile numbers, that'd be great. The on-site guys are putting in long hours and could probably use more help.

Lou Figueroa
 
Which players are you speaking of -- we've only had one guy shooting so far.

Lou Figueroa
It was a general comment that applies to any player that will attempt a high run. So after the day is completed it would be cool to see the scores of all the runs that day. It would be nice for people that are not able to watch every run. I remember when John was doing his runs that either he or someone would post either on facebook or here what the scores of all the runs he did in a day.
 
It was a general comment that applies to any player that will attempt a high run. So after the day is completed it would be cool to see the scores of all the runs that day. It would be nice for people that are not able to watch every run. I remember when John was doing his runs that either he or someone would post either on facebook or here what the scores of all the runs he did in a day.

It may be doable, it may not.

Like I just said, we're new at this and the on-site guys are doing good work and putting in long hours. Give them a chance.

Lou Figueroa
 
As I said earlier on "All My Children" we are new at this, have made mistakes and will undoubtably make more.

BTW, if any of you numbers hounds want to pay to get a statistician to the event site, or just compile numbers, that'd be great. The on-site guys are putting in long hours and could probably use more help.

Lou Figueroa
Oh, yeah sorry, we kind of expected the millionaire to have it all figured out before going live. Maybe he should have hired the Professor and Mary Ann.
 
As I said earlier on "All My Children" we are new at this, have made mistakes and will undoubtably make more.
Hmm, you spent years criticizing John for things like cleaning the balls, table specs, how he chose to share his historical 626 ball run.... And yet you couldn't stop yourselves from making simple mistakes..... Isn't it ironic... Don't ya think? A little too ironic, yeah I really do think. (Credit to Alanis Morrissete)


BTW, if any of you numbers hounds want to pay to get a statistician to the event site, or just compile numbers, that'd be great. The on-site guys are putting in long hours and could probably use more help.

Lou Figueroa
Because a project centered around numbers and super duper transparency wasn't important enough to figure this out before launch?
 
I didn't listen to much, had it on mute most of the time. I did hear him say Shane is the best American player for the past 15 years and I took that to mean in general not specifically 14.1. However, one would think that since Bobby is holding a 14.1 high run contest that he would mention the current world record holder in that particular activity, American John Schmidt, at 626.
It was 2 different statements
 
Back
Top