They say they do but price is the same, for about two months. I stated that in the original post.
There’s a lot of technical and corporate business sub processes that stand in between seeing what we see now and getting it “fixed” (behaving the way we expect). Nefariousness is probably not the explanation for what we see despite plenty of space to interpret it to be.
E-commerce is so hard, rare and fraught that it’s often outsourced. Entirely or in pieces combined in house.
Seyberts is going to be so far removed from the point of affecting a change.big or small. It will be one of umpteen sites implemented in boiler plate fashion. Implementers will themselves operating to squeeze out their profits. The end result never has “perfect” as a goal..cost/speed and an assurance of big concerns (fraud, outage, breach, etc).
Another hurdle to perfection is how the overwhelming # of sites fall under a small # of core vendors. And the monsters take their share by having a VAR layer. What you see on that cue of the month listing is not out of the box core functionality. Bell and whistle features are left as add ons written by small players in a fast market of customization. They too are in it for speed over perfection, fighting version compatibility and turnover, hopefully able to sell their imperfect piece. That’s software in a snapshot. Put it in motion, with human turnover and technological advance and… I could keep going on about how and where imperfect creeps in.
If you need a perfect site/store you go with a provider who integrates all this. Presumably a different business need, business model, expectations and requirements for the user (in this case the user is a customer).
This all is my conjecture and opinion. I used to be in healthcare/hospital where a typo could mean life or death and reputations permanently lost. Today I’m in manufacturing. I’ve been through seyberts imperfect site as a customer. Now, having inherited my company’s e-commerce operation due to turnover I’d be thrilled if our site had only seyberts problems… our bugs are affecting the bottom line when you weigh cost return…. time opportunity lost.
Posting this because somewhere behind “these guys are crooks, look at their store”, is a baffling world. Right/wrong good/bad relevant/not are not absolutes. They’re design considerations. I totally understand the gist, but understand, any system running at 0 or 100%, someone will be bankrupt. Survival is finding that right threshold for your market.