A Few CTE Questions

Thresh said:
You have successfully made claims, then when asked to back up your claims, you go into hiding.

Where are your CAD drawings? You said it was so easy to prove CTE on CAD, do it, settle the debate for everyone.

Option two, let's hear a cowards excuse or silence, which one is it?
Click to expand...
youre a dumbass, I did not say I can prove CTE, I said I can mathmatically draw out in a cad system the solution to where ones vision center would need to be offset to to solve a cut shot using the cte fundamental process, or at least meant in whatever statement I made that lives in your little head. There is no solution to cte, every single shot is different, you could record and measure a shot that worked and easily draw it out, well I could, not you, but you could never do it before the shot, just how dumb are you anyway?
 
Renegade_56 said:
youre a dumbass, I did not say I can prove CTE, I said I can mathmatically draw out in a cad system the solution to where ones vision center would need to be offset to to solve a cut shot using the cte fundamental process, or at least meant in whatever statement I made that lives in your little head. There is no solution to cte, every single shot is different, you could record and measure a shot that worked and easily draw it out, well I could, not you, but you could never do it before the shot, just how dumb are you anyway?
Click to expand...


I'm a dumbass? Well looks look at your quote were you literally claim you can prove CTE with CAD...

Post #294

CTE Stepping Cue Ball.

I'm still confused on the exact steps of stepping the cueball. I read morhts article but I would like further clarification. A lot of my terminology might be a little outdated but once you lock in your visuals, what is the precise order of...
forums.azbilliards.com

"Tell you what, I can actually prove CTE works with CAD, can you prove it doesn't?"


But hey, I'm really excited to hear your next excuse why you won't prove anything.
 
Casting 9s said:
So yesterday, I watched the first several videos of Stan Shuffett's CTE Pro-1 series. I then listened to them for several more hours while on my route as a mailman today so I could really let it sink into my subconscious. Then after I got home from work it was straight to the practice table. All I can really say is WOW. I've been a pretty good shot maker for awhile now (I have to credit CJ Wiley and his videos for that.) But this was another level I've never gotten to up until now. I worked on this for about 3 hours, and by the end, I was just a total sniper. The shots that have always given me the most problems are the side-pocket shots at those tough angles where you really have a tiny window. But with this, I was making them at nearly a 100% clip with ease. I was pretty skeptical about all of this, but decided to give those videos my full attention and give it a chance, and I really am glad I did now. My only minor gripe is that Stan is a bit off-center himself, so the delivery of his information is a bit awkward at times, and the cadence at which he speaks throws me off from time to time as well. However, I guess he did just fine because I remembered everything he talked about once I got on the table and I had no problems putting it all into practice. I think he is genuinely passionate about this stuff.

So I combined everything CJ taught me through his videos as far as stance and that pop-stroke and being consistent in everything I do, with this CTE Pro-1 to aim. I only missed a few balls in that whole 3 hours, and each time, the reason for the miss was easily identifiable. With that said, I do have a few questions for seasoned CTE users:

- Almost all of, if not all of the few shots I did miss were because I picked the wrong reference point (A when I should have used B, and vice versa. Or maybe using B when I should have used C). Is there a way to tell which one has to be used or does that just come through experience? It didn't happen often, but there were a few tricky angles that were kind of "tweeners" and I picked the wrong one.

- Once you get your aiming line with your head tilted using parallax vision, are you then focusing your vision straight down the center of that line with your head still tilted, or are you turning your head back straight ahead and aiming straight down the aiming line? I was doing the latter, and that felt correct.

- Is it necessary to pivot at all, or is that an entirely different, more advanced way of doing this? I was doing no pivoting whatsoever. I was finding my aiming line using the parallax vision, stepping into that line, and delivering the shot. That's it. And like I was saying, I was making literally 98% of my shots no matter the distance from the CB to OB, or length of the shot. Everything was just... automatic. I felt how Larry Bird must have felt like in all those 3-point contests. Is it ok just to stick with this, or do you recommend learning all the pivoting as well?

- I was doing this practice on a bar table. How much more fickle is this on a 9-footer? I play most of my matches on the 9-footers and I wonder how much different it will be when I take it onto those. If I can snipe like this on a 9-footer, I'll be sold for life.

Color me intrigued! I'm definitely going to be spending more time on this. It was kind of mind-blowing how well it worked, and it was really fun to use. By the end, I really had a lot of confidence in every shot I took. I knew I was going to make it before I even got down on the ball. It really just clicks.
Click to expand...

popcorn.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bbb
Renegade_56 said:
well it's like this, I see no point in arguing a point with people who refuse to actually try the system correctly, yet proclaim for years that it does not work, that being DW and PJ, when I know for sure it does work because it does so for me and others, so that's good enough, and then there is you, who have added nothing of value to any CTE thread I have seen your little smart ass remarks in, about any topic honestly, so I pretty much just turned you off. No time for you,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Click to expand...
I still use CTE, but only when I'm a 1/5 of the way through a fifth. (y)
(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)
 
Renegade_56 said:
youre a dumbass, I did not say I can prove CTE, I said I can mathmatically draw out in a cad system the solution to where ones vision center would need to be offset to to solve a cut shot using the cte fundamental process, or at least meant in whatever statement I made that lives in your little head. There is no solution to cte, every single shot is different, you could record and measure a shot that worked and easily draw it out, well I could, not you, but you could never do it before the shot, just how dumb are you anyway?
Click to expand...
Name 3 products of Computer Aided Software. I'll wait.

... I don't even expect you to name the ones where you could move the "camera" to where your eyes would be.

3 names, use google if you are scured.
 
Renegade_56 said:
youre a dumbass, I did not say I can prove CTE, I said I can mathmatically draw out in a cad system the solution to where ones vision center would need to be offset to to solve a cut shot using the cte fundamental process, or at least meant in whatever statement I made that lives in your little head. There is no solution to cte, every single shot is different, you could record and measure a shot that worked and easily draw it out, well I could, not you, but you could never do it before the shot, just how dumb are you anyway?
Click to expand...
I'll be nice, ignore my previous post. We realize CTE can cover an infinite number of shots. We don't want a proof. Show us one. Just ONE and it will satiate our appetite for CTE.

The proof is in the puddin. You know one CTE shot or you're full of :poop:
 
Renegade_56 said:
youre a dumbass, I did not say I can prove CTE, I said I can mathmatically draw out in a cad system the solution to where ones vision center would need to be offset to to solve a cut shot using the cte fundamental process, or at least meant in whatever statement I made that lives in your little head. There is no solution to cte, every single shot is different, you could record and measure a shot that worked and easily draw it out, well I could, not you, but you could never do it before the shot, just how dumb are you anyway?
Click to expand...
I’ve been having a hard time understanding this vision offset/stepping thing that has come out of the latest generation of Stan’s work. I’ve asked about it in civil discussion tone in 1-2 other cte/aiming threads last few mo, but nothing comes back. As an engineer & overly analytical type, it actually would be really helpful to have an example CAD diagram as you describe. I’m not an anti CTE-er or trying to antagonize you in any way, its a sincere request - since you offered. Thx
 
Last edited:
boogieman said:
Name 3 products of Computer Aided Software. I'll wait.

... I don't even expect you to name the ones where you could move the "camera" to where your eyes would be.

3 names, use google if you are scured.
Click to expand...
you are as dumb as your buddy here, I am retired with 46 years in engineering, cad modeling, and cnc programming, am certified is a slew of cad design and programming softwares used world wide in manufacturing and design of pretty much everything,,,,,,, you have no clue, and probably less about cte. Stop wasting my time with your little girl attacks. I'm blocking your ass too.
 
Renegade_56 said:
you are as dumb as your buddy here, I am retired with 46 years in engineering, cad modeling, and cnc programming, am certified is a slew of cad design and programming softwares used world wide in manufacturing and design of pretty much everything,,,,,,, you have no clue, and probably less about cte. Stop wasting my time with your little girl attacks. I'm blocking your ass too.
Click to expand...
More deflection. Name 3 CAD type software. If you can't, you're nothing but 🐂:poop:

Simple as that. End the discussion, you have the ball in your court. No holier than thou gaslighting. Just name 3. Google if you have to, but know in your own head that that's weaksauce.

EDIT: If @Renegade_56 really blocks me, I'm winning. That means 2 CTE acolytes have blocked me because the truth and actually showing they know the system as well as me is too tough. 🍼
 
boogieman said:
More deflection. Name 3 CAD type software. If you can't, you're nothing but 🐂:poop:

Simple as that. End the discussion, you have the ball in your court. No holier than thou gaslighting. Just name 3. Google if you have to, but know in your own head that that's weaksauce.

EDIT: If @Renegade_56 really blocks me, I'm winning. That means 2 CTE acolytes have blocked me because the truth and actually showing they know the system as well as me is too tough. 🍼
Click to expand...
Here is the one you need to know dude, seriously you spell like a 3rd grader,,,, Spellchecker

I personally own a full blown seat of Gibbscam on this very computer that costs more than your bicycle, your skateboard, and your chinese pool stick all put together.
 
Thresh said:
What does our rank matter? You have already taken the title as the best pool player in the world. Everyone else on the planet is under you.
Click to expand...
Yes, we’ve already established that I’m the best in the world. That we all agree on. But I’m curious if you think you could beat PJ.
 
Thresh said:
I'm a dumbass? Well looks look at your quote were you literally claim you can prove CTE with CAD...

Post #294

CTE Stepping Cue Ball.

I'm still confused on the exact steps of stepping the cueball. I read morhts article but I would like further clarification. A lot of my terminology might be a little outdated but once you lock in your visuals, what is the precise order of...
forums.azbilliards.com

"Tell you what, I can actually prove CTE works with CAD, can you prove it doesn't?"


But hey, I'm really excited to hear your next excuse why you won't prove anything.
Click to expand...


@Renegade_56 Are you going to offer an excuse or are you going with the silent coward strategy again?
 
phreaticus said:
I’ve been having a hard time understanding this vision offset/stepping thing that has come out of the latest generation of Stan’s work. I’ve asked about it in civil discussion tone in 1-2 other cte/aiming threads last few mo, but nothing comes back. As an engineer & overly analytical type, it actually would be really helpful to have an example CAD diagram as you describe. I’m not an anti CTE-er or trying to antagonize you in any way, its a sincere request - since you offered. Thx
Click to expand...
Don't hold your breath waiting for him to do anything he claims he can easily do. He offered, I asked him to do it, then the excuses started coming and never ending.
 
Renegade_56 said:
Here is the one you need to know dude, seriously you spell like a 3rd grader,,,, Spellchecker

I personally own a full blown seat of Gibbscam on this very computer that costs more than your bicycle, your skateboard, and your chinese pool stick all put together.
Click to expand...
Who brought cost into it? More gaslighting? Big powerful man got big money and me peasant don't? Denigrating people who ask you to do the very thing you said is silly. You said it, no one made you say it.

It's really simple, you said you could make a CAD diagram of CTE, or a single CTE shot even. You don't because you cant. Continue projecting and pretending to not do it for various reasons. The real reason is clear as day, you can't do it, no matter how many seats of Gibbscam you own. Is it through your lack of skill, or the fact that CTE isn't what you think it is? Another simple question that a 3rd grader could answer, yet you will try to slip out of it.

bunny.jpg
 
Correct.... Even Efren misses more than this guy...


Of course he does. That’s because I am the best player in the world (as we’ve all agreed on here), and Efren isn’t. Pretty simple.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top