Will 4 inches pockets be the future of US pool, bar box and big table?

I like tight pockets and I’d get my home table adjusted to 4” if I didn’t enjoy play straight pool so much. But unless a pool room is changing the cloth on a regular basis and has a strict cleaning regimen, 4” pockets in a public pool room would be brutal.
My local place has 10 nice GC4's. Six have about 4.25 corners and the rest are 4.5 ALL of them are too tight for general recreation play. I've tried to set the owners straight and just have four tight ones and open the rest but they just have no clue about pool.
 
Will 4 inches pocket be the future of US pool, bar box and big table?
Takes away from the game, it’s not better and doesn’t equate to a “better player.” The best players can move the cue ball and use all of the pocket to do it and to make certain shots. The smaller you make the pockets, the more one dimensional you make the game. Also smaller pockets discourage pushing the limits during practice, trying new shots, extreme spin, etc. Actually hurts your game to practice on pockets under 4.25.
 
Golf courses are differentiated by their wideness/narrowness, flatness/undulations, roughness/smoothness, trees/not trees, and many other things that I won't ramble on about.

Pool tables are flat, with 6 holes in uniform positions.

Your analogy is ridiculous. Why golf as a comparison anyway?
Comparison makes sense to me, golf is the most similar game to pool—fact!
 
I believe less than 4.5" pockets take away from the enjoyment for those not obsessed with pool, the people playing once or twice a month or less. I think they make it much harder to learn to play shape too.

I think most of us worked our way down to tight pockets. I started on bucket pocketed five by tens and bar tables. At my best I could play shape on a snooker table tightened up to play golf on. The pockets were tight, the shelves were deep. Impossible to run down a rail and pocket a ball without helping english. That old table made the Riley Championship pockets look like buckets. I doubt I would have ever learned to play anything but the crudest shape had I started out playing on that old snooker table and never played the tables with at least three distinct lanes into the pocket, some people said five lanes.

Hu
 
And is useless for ANY rotation games much less 14.1 IMO the 4.5" Diamond ProCut's combined with their deeper shelf is a great all'round set-up.
I don’t like the deep shelf, otherwise yes for all around it’s a great set up
 
I remember reading what JS once said about ’massive runs’ in straight pool and that is that they would not be possible without 5 inch pockets. For the straight pool high run challenges I say keep the 5 inchers but for everything else the tighter pockets are preferable.
 
I remember reading what JS once said about ’massive runs’ in straight pool and that is that they would not be possible without 5 inch pockets. For the straight pool high run challenges I say keep the 5 inchers but for everything else the tighter pockets are preferable.
At the last American 14.1 tournament i watched they used ProCut Diamonds. Didn't slow those guys down one bit. Here's Filler TORTURING Alex:
 
I have pro cuts on my GC4 and they are tight but fair.

I have a 4.125" extra top being worked on right now by Mark. I'll let you know on a few weeks how I feel about that pocket size.
 
I have pro cuts on my GC4 and they are tight but fair.

I have a 4.125" extra top being worked on right now by Mark. I'll let you know on a few weeks how I feel about that pocket size.
Fine for a home table and 1p but awfully tight for rot. and impossible for 14.1 to be played correctly. In a poolroom they're a nightmare.
 
Last edited:
I like difficult shots, and I find the types of games played by the pros a little boring to watch, because they play so safe.

It's just my opinion, but I think smaller pockets would make the game even more boring, because it would discourage high-difficulty shots even more.

For the pros, I'd like to see a game that rewards intricate shot-making, such as Honolulu Rules. For casuals and bangers, pool is already difficult enough to discourage most of them from playing regularly, so making it even harder seems counterproductive.

I wouldn't change anything, but if I were going to change the pockets, I'd make them a little bigger. Pool seems to me to be all-but-inaccessible to new players, what with all the equipment options, the inconsistent rules, and the inherent difficulty of the game - making pockets smaller would make things even harder on new players.
 
According to FargoRate, There are about 30 600 rated players per 1 million population. Call it 10,000 in the entire US.

The last numbers I remember seeing from the BCA indicated something in the neighborhood of 20 million players in the United States.

That‘s one 600 rated player for every 2,000 pool players. I was wrong, it’s not an extremely small percentage. It’s minuscule…
Are you calling me minuscule? What snow flakes do I complain to.
 
My local place has 10 nice GC4's. Six have about 4.25 corners and the rest are 4.5 ALL of them are too tight for general recreation play. I've tried to set the owners straight and just have four tight ones and open the rest but they just have no clue about pool.
Is that at Magoo’s
 
bigger pockets open up more possibilities in the play of the game,
nothing wrong with having some tight pockets for those that want them.
for the general players and even decent ones wider pockets make the game more fun.

if your high run is like 30 or less than 5 inch corners will give you enough of a test and let you use the pocket for position.
my general rule is if you can run 50 balls in 14.1 regularly than 4.5 pockets are fine.
if you run 75 plus you can use smaller pockets and still do many of the tougher position shots and gamble on a tough shot to get more balls than just the one.
 
Back
Top