Sure you are.When you reach the upper levels of their handicapping system. Difficulty on a 7 foot table really doesn't matter that much. I'm still running racking on big or small pockets fast or slow cloth. I will make the adjustment even if the table is not perfectly level too.
A 5 is still a noob. You might be a little bit better then your friends. But you are still losing to any regular pool player.
Do you ever tire of hearing the whoosh of your hand patting yourself on the back?I'm a SL7 in 8-ball and a SL9 in 9-ball. For those who don't know those ratings, I'm excellent lol. Our league plays most games on 7-foot Diamonds. Our friends, one town over, play their league on Valleys.
When we get together for practice, the Valley SLs play worse than our similarly rated players, on EITHER brand table.
My point here is that the Valley-rated folks are at a disadvantage to the Dimond-rated folks, by about one skill level imo.
And when Dimond players go to the big tourneys, they play better because the tournament uses Valley tables which are, frankly, toys, compared to Diamonds.
As g-string said, the 23-point rule is really a way of getting existing members to recruit new members. As handicaps go up, teams split up and form new teams--and have to find new players. APA will never change that rule.The 23-point rule basically means that by the time you get to a Fargo 550--it is time to look for a pool league outside of APA.
AND I think APA knows this and the players should know this too.
I disagree. The APA needs "good" pool players. As stated before, the APA benefits when folks improve (teams splitting due to the 23 rule). The fastest way to get new players/mediocre players to improve, is to be mentored by stronger players.Yes, APA understands it is for pool players that are "not that good" and sees itself as a stepping stone to leagues with better players--
Like::AAA baseball--that feeds minor league baseball--that feeds major league baseball.
APA feeds BCA feeds PROs (except there is not really a PRO league right now.)
Quick, someone tell svb his favorite game isn't for "REAL" playersThis is one of the best arguments for standardization. In the old days, not really that long ago, we had real pool on 9 footers, and bar pool on bar boxes. They weren't really the same game. Moving from a slow, loose, bar box like a Valley to a GC was a brutal change.
APA was/is designed for bar pool bangers, and that is great! It would be better if all APA league matches were played on bar boxes with loose pockets. The matches would go faster. The recreational players might run out once in a while. Everyone would get more sleep.
The trouble is that Diamond invented a very attractive product. If you tighten up a bar box, put wicked fast cloth on it, that tiny 7 footer feels almost like a real pool table (I will not start ranting about how they kick/bank). And, if you get halfway decent on a Diamond (which has the virtue of not taking up too much real estate) you can play pretty decent on a "real" table.
The Diamond produces a moral hazard for room operators though. It takes up less room and is acceptable to "real" pool players. So now we have three tiers that aren't really the same game. "Real" pool on Diamond 7', real pool on 9ft tables, and bar pool. That would be okay, but now everyone wants to import the "features" of the Diamond compromise table back to the big tables.
Pool needs people to enjoy playing it because only players are ever realistically going to be fans, much like golf. Almost any APA player would be happier playing on a loose bar box, but because of the Diamond compromise, we get to watch SL3s play 90 minute races to 25 balls.
We need a "play up" campaign, but for bigger pockets. 4.125" pockets aren't any more fun for normal league players than 7500 yard golf course are for 20 handicaps.
i quit APA after having to split a team i enjoyed playing with. Also APA isnt that great .....I disagree. The APA needs "good" pool players. As stated before, the APA benefits when folks improve (teams splitting due to the 23 rule). The fastest way to get new players/mediocre players to improve, is to be mentored by stronger players.
Maybe its just a difference of definitions between us as to what constitutes a player "not that good". We have several in our league between 650 and 700 FR. Folks that travel all over the southeast playing tourneys, and are invaluable when league night rolls around as far as coaching and instructing.
Going by the APA system. You have Shane Van Boening playing as a APA 9. I would be playing him equally no way in hell is that game straight up
View attachment 659107
Yep I've had to split my team a couple of times over the last 5 years. It sucks when you have a good group, but it is also fun to see someone taking over as a new captain and building their team...and then crushing them on the table.i quit APA after having to split a team i enjoyed playing with. Also APA isnt that great .....
yeah ... i went from a 4 to a 8 and a 9 in 9 ball in the course of a summer session ...Yep I've had to split my team a couple of times over the last 5 years. It sucks when you have a good group, but it is also fun to see someone taking over as a new captain and building their team...and then crushing them on the table.
This 100000%%%%% To me this is the biggest weakness of the APA handicap system. Players in my local league outright will tell you they don't mark D, esp when trying to just kick / hit a ball. They will even argue with you that its not a defensive shot, even after you show them the APA video. I don't know how to fix this part, but lower level players who keep score, really don't know how to recognize a defensive shot, but you just can't say only 5's and higher can keep score because its hard enough they way it is to get scorekeepers, esp on double jeopardy nights playing on 3 or 4 tables at a time.In my experience with APA, despite LO's encouragement to mark defensive shots, I estimate I'm in the 10% (is it even that high?) minority of players who actually record safety attempts. And most of the few people who do mark safeties don't take into account INTENT, such as also marking a defensive shot when shooting out of a lock up, where it's obvious they're only trying to make contact with their OB. Most believe it's only a defensive shot when trying to lock up an opponent.
Some APA league operators offer Super 30. Team skill limit of 30 instead of 23. This league product has no road to Nationals in Las Vegas, and only offered as a cash league.The 23-point rule basically means that by the time you get to a Fargo 550--it is time to look for a pool league outside of APA.
AND I think APA knows this and the players should know this too.
the scoring app works perfect in our area now, before it didnt though.
I know this thread started out as discussing APA handicap rules, but please permit me to digress a bit.but you just can't say only 5's and higher can keep score because its hard enough they way it is to get scorekeepers, esp on double jeopardy nights playing on 3 or 4 tables at a time.
Pool is a bomb. The biggest flaw with APA is "convenience marketing". People need 7 Elevens more than pool. Their market will always be casual recreationers.
I think we're agreeing. It makes total sense that the Diamond 7ft tables dominate the modern game. They take up the real estate of a bar box but are suitable for elite players. My point is that when you replace all of the bar boxes with Diamonds the game is less approachable and more frustrating for novice players and that's bad for growth and going to bed the same day your league match started. I'm not saying SVB should play on Valleys and I'm not saying Justin Thomas should play 5500 yd golf courses, but the average player would be happier doing both.Quick, someone tell svb his favorite game isn't for "REAL" players
Sounds a lot like my own journey, almost to perfection. My Double Jeopardy team quit after last session solely due to the late nights, it was after midnight almost every week, we were there until 1:30am one week. Most of us formed a 9ball only team on another night. Last night was the first night and we started at 7:00pm (DJ was 6:30) and we were out of there by 9:30pm, even with the scoring app crashing and having to catch up all the scores.I know this thread started out as discussing APA handicap rules, but please permit me to digress a bit.
I've been playing APA since 2019. I learned how to keep score. I became co-captain and then captain of one of our double-jeopardy teams.
After a while, I ended up being chained to my chair all night keeping score. Others either feigned that they didn't know how (after showing them many times) or flat out refused. Running both teams when my cohort captain was absent, with two matches going on, sometimes makeup matches, and even doubling up matches so we didn't get done at 12:30am (starting at 7pm), made pool night NOT FUN AT ALL.
I can't fault my LO. They do a really nice job but as in any endeavor involving people from the "general population", if you are assigned players because you don't know five people of your own to field a team, well, you get what you get.
I had threatened to skip fall session altogether, intending to sign up for a BCA league, but I was enticed to try a Scotch Doubles 8-ball league. A former teammate and I have done only one week, and we've practiced Scotch together (the game, not the liquor!), and so far we're having a TON OF FUN. Three matches, start at 7:30, done by 10 or 10:30, and we're learning from each other, especially in the Scotch match where we have to focus on CB position for our partner. Makes us bear down better and think much more before shooting.
I don't have "the answer" to the "teammate" conundrum, except that the more you participate, the more people you know to recruit for a team, rather than depending on the LO to assign players. Providing your own players helps craft team chemistry.