Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know I might not win against Jason even in Full Rack Bank - but let me know if y'all decide to take a walk on the wilde' side.
Your offer to play Jayson in one pocket has been accepted, they are waiting for you
to take the walk on the wild side. Ball has been on your side of the table since you disappeared.
I think they are ready to set a date and place and $$$$. Go to Derby, you can get it done there.
 
I know I might not win against Jason even in Full Rack Bank - but let me know if y'all decide to take a walk on the wilde' side.
They did decide and accepted your challenge and terms.
Money posted.
Then you ran away.

You got memory loss or something?

How about we start a new thread about you vs Shaw, Bobby etc.
Lay out the terms and move on it from there.

It has nothing to do with this long dead thread.
 
They did decide and accepted your challenge and terms.
Money posted.

Then you ran away. You got memory loss or something?
How about we start a new thread about you vs Shaw, Bobby etc.
Lay out the terms and move on it from there.
It has nothing to do with this long dead thread.
Perfect suggestion. Take the initiative, Telly and start it post haste!
Compose an intriguing Title, and open the text of your new thread with all of the relevant facts/details associated with the accurate words of yours I've blue-fonted above.

All the folks involved in your factual account should sensibly realize that the event will be a win-win situation for all involved, as would be the re-match or even series of re-matches. It can all be captured on video then readily monetized.

As to anyone's wounded pride in having risked a loss, moderately intelligent people who follow any mano-a-mano sport or game (chess) know that with high-level world-class players, the result of any given contest doesn't irrefutably establish who is the better player . . . such results only commonsensically simply denote who was the better player on that given day.

Bottom line let's get it on! Get with it Telly - you're got all the facts. Just organize the details showing the background of why the event should happen and poste it all as a new thread.

Arnaldo
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ACL
Not one(1) living/dead human has ever equaled/exceeded Mosconi’s526 on the same oversized 4’x8’ oversized Brunswick or any other, namebrand OEM, 46”x92” playing surface table, with standard OEM regulation pockets.
Anyone who says different, there are plenty of existing tables to prove your invalid proclamation of non facts.
Have at it, or move on from bullshit unethical claims against Mosconi’s526.
Nothing else matters against the dead man’s accomplishments, NOTHING.
But Jayson and likely John ran more balls than 526.

Weve been through this before: you want to claim some technicality in retrospect as your basis for invalidation.

Your opinion matters the same as anyone else's, it is irrelevant to the matter of record evaluation.
 
Not one(1) living/dead human has ever equaled/exceeded Mosconi’s526 on the same oversized 4’x8’ oversized Brunswick or any other, namebrand OEM, 46”x92” playing surface table, with standard OEM regulation pockets.
Now I agree with this statement. 526 is the highest run on a 46x92(oversized 8ft or what is known as Pro 8 table.
714 on a 50x100(9ft)
337 on a 56x112(10ft)
 
Absolutely correct, without any doubt.
Screenshot_20230103-192248.jpg
 
Get off your high horse.
Opinions are like assholes, everybody has at least one, that they use to speak out of except you.
That's my point and I thank you for acknowledging what I've always known: I am the only one not speaking through my ahole.
 
Not one(1) living/dead human has ever equaled/exceeded Mosconi’s526 on the same oversized 4’x8’ oversized Brunswick or any other, namebrand OEM, 46”x92” playing surface table, with standard OEM regulation pockets.
Anyone who says different, there are plenty of existing tables to prove your invalid proclamation of non facts.
Have at it, or move on from bullshit unethical claims against Mosconi’s526.
Nothing else matters against the dead man’s accomplishments, NOTHING.
Did Mosconi make 526 on a table identical to the table used to set the previous record?

Sent using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACL
Perfect suggestion. Take the initiative, Telly and start it post haste!
Compose an intriguing Title, and open the text of your new thread with all of the relevant facts/details associated with the accurate words of yours I've blue-fonted above.

All the folks involved in your factual account should sensibly realize that the event will be a win-win situation for all involved, as would be the re-match or even series of re-matches. It can all be captured on video then readily monetized.

As to anyone's wounded pride in having risked a loss, moderately intelligent people who follow any mano-a-mano sport or game (chess) know that with high-level world-class players, the result of any given contest doesn't irrefutably establish who is the better player . . . such results only commonsensically simply denote who was the better player on that given day.

Bottom line let's get it on! Get with it Telly - you're got all the facts. Just organize the details showing the background of why the event should happen and poste it all as a new thread.

Arnaldo
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
You want me to create a post instead of Wrdlpro (Bobby) and Dan.
To be the middle man in effect.

Sure, when I have a spare 30 minutes to search through this thread amongst all the trash to find the posts where both parties agreed on terms.
I am not surprised you missed it, you can blink and this thread blows out another 10 pages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top