Why do you think you can assign any responsibility to the WPA?If the WPA does not recognize high runs on the record books, then its a matter of time before the living pool players forget the truth.
Why do you think you can assign any responsibility to the WPA?If the WPA does not recognize high runs on the record books, then its a matter of time before the living pool players forget the truth.
Your offer to play Jayson in one pocket has been accepted, they are waiting for youI know I might not win against Jason even in Full Rack Bank - but let me know if y'all decide to take a walk on the wilde' side.
They did decide and accepted your challenge and terms.I know I might not win against Jason even in Full Rack Bank - but let me know if y'all decide to take a walk on the wilde' side.
ya they posted the money, you just block everyone and act like you didnt seeit , lalalalalala i cant see you lalalalaI know I might not win against Jason even in Full Rack Bank - but let me know if y'all decide to take a walk on the wilde' side.
Danny was putting in work last night at shooters I seen him lolDanny and Red Hawk must be on their honeymoon
Timely reminderView attachment 675286
View attachment 675287
View attachment 675288
View attachment 675289
Jayson vs. Dan.
High run challenge.
C'mon Danny boy, you want to prove being told you were not good enough to try a record attempt is knawing at you like a dog with bone...
Nom nom nom.
The only way you can get out of this giant quick sand trap you put yourself in is playing Jayson 714 Shaw.
Or its the door for you.
No, he’s just posting under his more delusional, ignorant personality.Danny still MIA?
Perfect suggestion. Take the initiative, Telly and start it post haste!They did decide and accepted your challenge and terms.
Money posted.
Then you ran away. You got memory loss or something?
How about we start a new thread about you vs Shaw, Bobby etc.
Lay out the terms and move on it from there.
It has nothing to do with this long dead thread.
100% fake until we see a 100% unedited video which no one has ever seen.So have we determined if Schmidt and Charlie's 626 is legit or not?
But Jayson and likely John ran more balls than 526.Not one(1) living/dead human has ever equaled/exceeded Mosconi’s526 on the same oversized 4’x8’ oversized Brunswick or any other, namebrand OEM, 46”x92” playing surface table, with standard OEM regulation pockets.
Anyone who says different, there are plenty of existing tables to prove your invalid proclamation of non facts.
Have at it, or move on from bullshit unethical claims against Mosconi’s526.
Nothing else matters against the dead man’s accomplishments, NOTHING.
Now I agree with this statement. 526 is the highest run on a 46x92(oversized 8ft or what is known as Pro 8 table.Not one(1) living/dead human has ever equaled/exceeded Mosconi’s526 on the same oversized 4’x8’ oversized Brunswick or any other, namebrand OEM, 46”x92” playing surface table, with standard OEM regulation pockets.
Absolutely correct, without any doubt.
That's my point and I thank you for acknowledging what I've always known: I am the only one not speaking through my ahole.Get off your high horse.
Opinions are like assholes, everybody has at least one, that they use to speak out of except you.
Did Mosconi make 526 on a table identical to the table used to set the previous record?Not one(1) living/dead human has ever equaled/exceeded Mosconi’s526 on the same oversized 4’x8’ oversized Brunswick or any other, namebrand OEM, 46”x92” playing surface table, with standard OEM regulation pockets.
Anyone who says different, there are plenty of existing tables to prove your invalid proclamation of non facts.
Have at it, or move on from bullshit unethical claims against Mosconi’s526.
Nothing else matters against the dead man’s accomplishments, NOTHING.
Clever.Ask Mosconi
Correct.Clever.
So the rules only apply when you dislike the results.
Sent using Tapatalk
You want me to create a post instead of Wrdlpro (Bobby) and Dan.Perfect suggestion. Take the initiative, Telly and start it post haste!
Compose an intriguing Title, and open the text of your new thread with all of the relevant facts/details associated with the accurate words of yours I've blue-fonted above.
All the folks involved in your factual account should sensibly realize that the event will be a win-win situation for all involved, as would be the re-match or even series of re-matches. It can all be captured on video then readily monetized.
As to anyone's wounded pride in having risked a loss, moderately intelligent people who follow any mano-a-mano sport or game (chess) know that with high-level world-class players, the result of any given contest doesn't irrefutably establish who is the better player . . . such results only commonsensically simply denote who was the better player on that given day.
Bottom line let's get it on! Get with it Telly - you're got all the facts. Just organize the details showing the background of why the event should happen and poste it all as a new thread.
Arnaldo
______________________________________________________________________________________________________