Hunter v Frost, your stance?
- Thread starter u12armresl
- Start date
Thats exactly what should have been done. I didn't say anything negative about Hunter. The Ref situation is the problem. I don't think all ball foul rule should apply to a shirt that happens to barely touch a ball, but that's just me.
Agree 1000% here.
Shirt touches are one of the reasons for all ball fouls. Either go by it or don't use the rule. Can't pick and choose which part/interpretation of a rule you like/dislike. No ref? No rule.
Emily should have been notified sooner.
Both players deserve equal attention from ref and administration.
Refs making a bad call in a tense situation is problematic in many sports.
If the ref cant make a call due to absence, then the ref should call the TD.
This is why @jay helfert should be a consultant or virtual director for Matchroom events.
Both players deserve equal attention from ref and administration.
Refs making a bad call in a tense situation is problematic in many sports.
If the ref cant make a call due to absence, then the ref should call the TD.
This is why @jay helfert should be a consultant or virtual director for Matchroom events.
With respect I have to disagree where you say "it played out as it should have".
If either the ref witnessed the foul herself or both players agreed that there was a foul or the ref was able to access video proof that there was a foul or someone like, for instance, Pat Flemming was there watching and he, as a "trusted witness" said there was a foul, then, and only then. could she call a foul. That was their rules and that was the threshold that had to be met.
None of those requirements were met but she still called the foul on Scott and awarded Hunter BIH. Therefore, it did not play out as it should have *according to the rules*.
I feel like this guy (the one on top lol)..
something_pool
Registered
I'm 54....skills are lacking.
Posted by him yesterday.
If people want to believe the world is flat....that there's a Easter bunny .... or men can gave babies....that's on them. But the reality is still what it is....Scott should have been shooting to make in 8 to 7 breaking. From there I'd bet even he's winning.
ADDENDUM
I LEARNED HOW TO SCEEENSHOT JUST FOR AZB
Right from the horse's mouth folks. I rest my case.
Attachments
Last edited:
Well he was playing you....so you gotta take into account your oddities or that he was scared because you are a world beater. You choose.
Scott fouled, Hunter ended up with BIH. Are you saying that Hunter should not have gotten the BIH..?
I'm not talking about the incorrect method in which it played out. No argument from me about that debacle.
In the end, Scott rewarded Hunter with BIH. The ref did not. The ref was about to leave to bump it up the food chain when Scott stopped pressing the issue and conceded the BIH
The funniest part is you're supposedly beating a horse with a make believe batt. You're facts are somewhat wrong.
something_pool
Registered
So this screen shot does not say what you said in your post. All Scott says is, "And I know this won't happen again, and if it does, things happen it's not the end of the world and definitely not worth destroying a pool career." What you said happened was that the ref was told she made a bad call, and that Emily Frazer said that the rules will be changed. How you got from Scott's post to that claim I don't really know.
Emily Frazer says things need to be more pro-level and that her whole goal is to make pool more pro but in the same breath she refuses to have a referee on every table. Talk is cheap and when it comes to money she won't deliver.
Any pro level sport has referees calling the shots, not the opponent or audience members.
Just dumb as hell.
Any pro level sport has referees calling the shots, not the opponent or audience members.
Just dumb as hell.
Talk about selective reading.
Read it again fool.
"They are making changes"
"I know this won't happen again "
Well if it wasn't for a small group of folks with comprehension issues.....
something_pool
Registered
You guys just wait til Hunter gets subpoenaed to testify in front of a congressional committee! His crime family will crumble. His laptop and his cue have already been impounded. I bet he removed the weight bolt in his cue and replaced it with a thumb drive containing many more fouls & cheat plots. Justice will be served my friends. Keep the faith.