Definitely. Looking forward to your comparison, that's what this thread needs. I couldn't do it since I only have the one carbon fiber shaft and lack the experience.I think I can add some value to this discussion.
Thanks.
Definitely. Looking forward to your comparison, that's what this thread needs. I couldn't do it since I only have the one carbon fiber shaft and lack the experience.I think I can add some value to this discussion.
Have not owned one(Rhino otw) but i have tried a bunch. I have not noticed any static-induced chalk/dust/diry issues. They seem to stay real clean/slick. Wipe with a eyeglass every so often.I like some characteristics of CF shafts. Never tried the Rhino. Biggest downfall is the static cling characteristic with chalk dust and other particles. Always go back to non-LD maple.
Funny you should mention that. I have recently noticed chalk particles clinging to my carbon fiber shaft. They wipe right off, one of the things I like about the CF. On my Schmelke maple shaft, the chalk would embed in the finish, changing the friction characteristics of the shaft forcing me to readjust my play as the friction increased. Hardly noticeable as it is a gradual change, until I played with my sons brand new Schmelke cue and the difference was significant. I do clean my shaft, but it's not like it was new. I'm trying to monitor this with the Rhino CF and so far it doesn't seem to "absorb" chalk particles like the Maple.Biggest downfall is the static cling characteristic with chalk dust
Whippy??? CF shaft?? i've tried about 8-10 different brands and diameters and would not describe on of them as even close to 'whippy' All were pretty stiff as a matter of fact.Put How mediums on all my shafts. Good choice. And looking forward to your review. Please include your opinion on the taper and difference compared to your cuetec. I personally don't enjoy their super straight taper (I play open bridge). I had their cynergy and just couldn't get used to the balance and feel of it. seemed too skinny and whippy.
Absolutely.I was reading another thread where a cue maker was commenting on how difficult it is to make his Maple shafts match in terms of performance and deflection. There are just so many variables in wood. The lamination process of some shafts help but variables are still present. I'm wondering if this is an advantage in carbon fiber as it is man-made. Would it be easier to assure consistency across the line with carbon fiber shafts?
Making cf shafts is like making tires. You can reproduce the same thing over and over. Plus they don't warp and you can't dent/ding one unless you're an idiot. I personally don't think they play much different but the ease of ownership is the big plus.I was reading another thread where a cue maker was commenting on how difficult it is to make his Maple shafts match in terms of performance and deflection. There are just so many variables in wood. The lamination process of some shafts help but variables are still present. I'm wondering if this is an advantage in carbon fiber as it is man-made. Would it be easier to assure consistency across the line with carbon fiber shafts?
People today are willing to spend more time and money on their leisure activities. This translates to more fussiness with their equipment. No surprise there.i hope they work out for you. i find it funny how modern day players put so much time and effort into the equipment they use.
i see so few in the pool rooms nowadays that could not beat the tenth best player from the past in the average room, who couldn't care much about his cue, or his chalk, or glove, or case, or the shoes he had on.
just the money in his pocket and who would play him for it.
This sucker ordered his for $19.
Should be here in 2 days (Prime) and if it junk, I got 30 days to return it. Amazon is good for something.
you must not play golf. pool has NOTHING on that game. people like nice, new stuff. human nature.i hope they work out for you. i find it funny how modern day players put so much time and effort into the equipment they use.
i see so few in the pool rooms nowadays that could not beat the tenth best player from the past in the average room, who couldn't care much about his cue, or his chalk, or glove, or case, or the shoes he had on.
just the money in his pocket and who would play him for it.
Ummmm....common knowledge.Just one example, Mosconi ran 526 balls in an exhibition in Springfield, Ohio. Great. But I'll bet you didn't know it was on an 8' table with 5 inch pockets. Still impressive, but considering the equipment, quite a bit of shine is gone.
True for the cognoscenti. But not for the other 99.44% that don't post here.Ummmm....common knowledge.
somewhat. good players change drivers these days a LOT.golf is like pool the weaker players are always buying the newest fad in equipment.
if you play with the low handicap players you see they tend to have what they played with years before.