Yeah, I honestly have no idea how it will play. I think it has a chance because the plastic is heavier than the wood, so I think I can make it weigh and balance the same when all is said and done. My biggest concern is the strength of the skinniest joint, which will be the 314 joint. For that one, I might use a pool cue joint of metal or phenolic inside a corresponding female thread of the printed piece there.Thanks for posting about the process, interesting. As for the result: I can't imagine it will play well. I imagine a plastic stick with 3 wobbly joints. But id love to see the result and hope it exceeds expectations.
I think most travel cues are split at about 20” and 3 pieces, so the joint diameter is larger than my split at 16”. The worst case is if the Predator shaft splits. If the 3d print splits, I can just print another one for 50 cents.
Flashback... I once owned a waterfront bar in Belize that I called Bambu.I have a Bambu P1S.
No issues with the hollow area. It's only about 5" deep. Here is a 314-1 I broke 20 years ago, then bandsawed to see inside. I still kept it all these years, ha ha. I think I made a CAD model of the inside of it at the time, but IDK where I put that.how far from the hollow area of the 314 are you splitting the shaft? i imagine that being quite important
P1S is good, we have a bunch of X1Cs at work for prototyping. never any problems, no tinkering.
I put it on a 60 deg V-block, its .003" TIR, not counting the start/stop ridge. Of course, when each section is about 8" long, who knows what it will do, and how straight it will be.That’s better than I get with my Prusa. What sort of printer are you using?
PLA because it's cheap, easy, and stiff. If I have issues, I can try something else afterwards. I've only ever printed that and PETG on my personal printer. I don't want to do ABS because of the fumes, and I don't want to try the carbon reinforced filaments yet, as I think I need to change my nozzle for that, and they cost a lot more.what filament and infill are you planning on using?
I did that this weekend. Flew for a dr appt, and played off the wall. I did ok in the tournament. Then afterwards, I got into action with a local. I couldn't spin the ball, it cost me. I ended up borrowing the owner's cue, which was a Meucci CF shaft. It was close to the predator, and I played way better with it. I really like Predator shafts, but I've been playing them since the 90s, and its so hard to play with anything else now.Well that sounds like a lot of fun!
(A lot easier but not as interesting - toss a tip tool in the carry-on and grab one off the wall. And hit closer to center ball.)
That is some dialed in stepper motors and extruder for those tolerances!!!View attachment 730794
The test print worked well. The inside top of the female thread built smoothly without support.
View attachment 730795
The top has a bit of a dish to it. The center is at zero. The edges on the next picture are .003" high.
View attachment 730796
Outer edges are .003" high, consistent around the whole perimeter. Good enough I think. On the plus side, that will mean the outer edges will touch first when the joint is tightened, which is what my goal was. I could potentially make a sanding jig to try to get it flatter. But I think it will be good enough as-is.
View attachment 730797
I have the real piece 6 and 7 on the printer now. It will take 5.5 hrs, at 100% infill. Tomorrow I will screw them together and see how it feels. Then break it with my hands, to see what it takes to break it. Hopefully it requires a kneeI should probably order some more filament, I guess the whole cue will take about a 1kg roll.
PLA because it's cheap, easy, and stiff. If I have issues, I can try something else afterwards. I've only ever printed that and PETG on my personal printer. I don't want to do ABS because of the fumes, and I don't want to try the carbon reinforced filaments yet, as I think I need to change my nozzle for that, and they cost a lot more.
Infill I want to do 100%. I thought concentric would be perfect for this shape, but I tried that on a test piece a few days ago, and it kept crashing the head into the material about .5" up. I don't know why. When I changed it to "rectilinear", it works fine at 100%. So I'll leave it there for now.
No issues with the hollow area. It's only about 5" deep. Here is a 314-1 I broke 20 years ago, then bandsawed to see inside. I still kept it all these years, ha ha. I think I made a CAD model of the inside of it at the time, but IDK where I put that.
View attachment 730779