No foul unless he dropped the CB onto the OB.
If the dude scratched, leaving 10-ball on the table, it's pretty chicken shit/pedantic to make the guy play in the first place. Most players would acknowledge that fouling on game ball is a guaranteed loss in the first place and concede it. Turns out if you're nitty enough, it's not...I was at a tournament today where a very strange situation occurred:
10-ball, BCA rules. Player 1 had ball-in-hand, and only the 10-ball was left on the table. As Player 1 was placing the cue ball, it fell into a pocket. The 10-ball was not disturbed. Player 2 called a foul. The TD was called over. Eventually, the TD ruled that the game would be re-played. Player 1 argued that there was no rule describing the situation as a foul, and therefore it was implicitly not a foul. The TD's rationale was that the situation isn't covered by the rules, hence their decision that the game should be replayed.
Thoughts?
It generated much discussion, and the opinion in the room (even among 600-700 fargos) was split regarding whether or not it's a foul.
I can't think of a single 600 or above I know that would call this a foul....snip...
It generated much discussion, and the opinion in the room (even among 600-700 fargos) was split regarding whether or not it's a foul.
Who didn't see it (?) but the AI guys are already trying to back out.I used to work for a lady who was older with no children and somewhat uptight, a dedicated and brilliant employee...I Iearned so much from her.
She'd always say, 'if we could just get rid of the people, this thing would run smoothly'.
Another example of 'NittiusMaximus'. Seems to be quite the problem these days.![]()
Sounds to me like player 2 is a nit.
Yes, Player 2 is known to be a nit with no reservations about winning from the chair.If the dude scratched, leaving 10-ball on the table, it's pretty chicken shit/pedantic to make the guy play in the first place. Most players would acknowledge that fouling on game ball is a guaranteed loss in the first place and concede it. Turns out if you're nitty enough, it's not...![]()
I can't think of a single BCA or USA league player of any level that would.I can't
I can't think of a single 600 or above I know that would call this a foul.
Is scratching on game ball not an automatic loss of frame? I've always played as if it is in just about every cue sport.Yes, Player 2 is known to be a nit with no reservations about winning from the chair.
Is scratching on game ball not an automatic loss of frame?
If people make me play it, I would. But I'd take immense disrespect away from it lolNope.
In most cases it results in ball in hand with the final money ball remaining. As often as not most players will concede that shot, but it's not an automatic loss by most rules...
Almost all pro tournaments actually require the player to play the ball in hand game ball, because they don’t allow concessions. On a local level, most players concede it.If people make me play it, I would. But I'd take immense disrespect away from it lol
Yes, it's generally like that in tournament play here also. Here, if both players verbally express concession and acceptance, then it is permitted.Almost all pro tournaments actually require the player to play the ball in hand game ball, because they don’t allow concessions. On a local level, most players concede it.
If people make me play it, I would. But I'd take immense disrespect away from it lol
You can skid those into the side with a little practice. They do come up. With BIH though, the cross side is the big pocket.I've actually asked a decent player to shoot and have been asked to do so myself.
In both cases the final ball was frozen to the side rail and very, very close to the side pocket, but not quite so close that you could jam it through the point into the side pocket itself.
A 9 foot table and lively rails. Just enough of a challenge that you're going to want to see that one go in…
I see the point in asking a challenging shot to be played. I also play against one guy imparticular, who I will make sink every single ball. No matter how easy. Simply because he is what I would describe as a 'cheat' through deliberate ambiguity.I've actually asked a decent player to shoot and have been asked to do so myself.
In both cases the final ball was frozen to the side rail and very, very close to the side pocket, but not quite so close that you could jam it through the point into the side pocket itself.
A 9 foot table and lively rails. Just enough of a challenge that you're going to want to see that one go in…
Player 2 breaks and scratches. Player 1 has BIH. Player 1 sweeps all the balls except the 9-ball into a pocket using his arm. Then he places the CB next to the 9-ball and sinks the 9-ball. Legal?No foul
Player 1 still has ball in hand
He has not shot yet
No that's an impending fist-fightPlayer 2 breaks and scratches. Player 1 has BIH. Player 1 sweeps all the balls except the 9-ball into a pocket using his arm. Then he places the CB next to the 9-ball and sinks the 9-ball. Legal?
Raking the balls is no longer allowed right?Player 2 breaks and scratches. Player 1 has BIH. Player 1 sweeps all the balls except the 9-ball into a pocket using his arm. Then he places the CB next to the 9-ball and sinks the 9-ball. Legal?
There's also a rule that covers this ridiculous questionPlayer 2 breaks and scratches. Player 1 has BIH. Player 1 sweeps all the balls except the 9-ball into a pocket using his arm. Then he places the CB next to the 9-ball and sinks the 9-ball. Legal?
There's also a rule that covers this ridiculous question
I'm sorry I'm not fluent in gibberishHow would they screw up enforcing or calling it?