All the chalk and tip threads. Just an oddball thought that LD might be less likely to slip past the ball or at least have a buffer zone that's missing in the old high mass wood shafts.
Nope……been playing with a LD roasted maple shaft for two weeks. I really like it so much I just ordered another one 12.75mm, 4.0 ozs. Flat Faced…….pretty nice specs……..the one I have now matched one of my shafts exactly……it’s
12.85 mm, 3.8 ozs., Flat Faced and my orig. shaft is a Scruggs shaft 12.8mm, 3.8 ozs. My RMS has a medium tip that’s
being changed right now to a Kamui Black Clear soft tip that’s on most of my cue shafts, including my Scruggs cue.
Anyway, back to your original query, when you venture into the miscue zone on the cue ball, the same rule applies to
LD shafts and all shafts. Of course, a thinner shaft will give you more tip versatility. For example. A 12mm shaft will
allow you to aim more tips of English from dead center than a 13mm tip. Once you venture into the outer perimeter
on the circular shape of a cue ball, you can’t maintain enough friction to control the cue ball reliably, exceptions being
masse’ shots and jump shots. Generally it’s about 20% in practical terms means you have 80% surface area to use.
Now this LD shaft I am using delivers the cue ball the length of the 9’ table with amazing accuracy. Frozen rail bank shots to opposite corner pockets, 8’ cut shots, and bank shots are easier and more natural. But venture into the miscue zone on the cue ball and it is going to happen. Besides, what kind of awful shape did you play to have to bridge or aim for that type shot? If you have to use extreme English to make a shot, then re-evaluate your options, like maybe play a smart safety?